Voices in Leadership During Crises: Karl Lauterbach

Jun 10, 2020

Karl Wilhelm Lauterbach, professor of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology at the University of Cologne, Member of the Deutsche Bundestag, and an Adjunct Faculty Member of the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Harvard School of Public Health will discuss the German response to the coronavirus pandemic with John McDonough, John E. McDonough, Professor of Public Health Practice in the Department of Health Policy & Management at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Director of Executive and Continuing Professional Education.

22:20

JOHN MCDONOUGH (Harvard): In the United States, there's a lot of confusion about when we might expect a vaccine?

Most of the experts are saying, listen, it's going to be 12 to 18 months out.

President Trump and other leaders and people from the industry are saying, look, this is on a real fast track, and we expect we're going to have a–

Doctor Fauci said we may have hundreds of thousands of vaccines ready in January.

What's your honest assessment of what we should expect or think about in terms of an effective vaccine?

KARL LAUTERBACH (minister of health in 2022): Well, my background, with respect to that question, is I read all of the vailable literature and am also in touch with the leading virologists in Germany,

obviously almost on a daily basis.

My impression is that it is slightly more likely that we have a vaccine in 12 to 18 months from now.

I would be surprised if we managed to have that earlier.

A vaccine that works, he has to be very effective and very safe at the same time.

And this is a difficult combination to have if you are looking at a coronavirus.

A lot of, let's say, very appealing, very modern types of vaccines that are currently tested like messenger RNA vaccines, they may work, let's hope they work but it is not that likely because so far for human, let's say, conditions,

they have never worked, they have never been employed.

I'm hard-pressed to see how we can put a vaccine into place for people that we have never seen working in humans for any other disease before.

So I would rely on more tests that routes and these routes typically with the safety you need here will take you 12 to 18 months.

That's how I would look at it and therefore, an earlier vaccine would be welcome, but we do not rely on that in Germany; we definitely do not.

Thank you.

Sauce:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkBKpv63wCw

>>17418119

>People voted Nazis into power

Let's check those numbers.

(pretending that you can indeed vote someone into power that matters, ESPECIALLY when the country has been occupied by military)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_1933_German_federal_election

33.1%, 196 seats

So in 1933, he "somehow" got33% of the votes.

Right. Doesn't look masonic at all, top fucking kek.

And how do you explain this here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Nathaniel_de_Rothschild#Imprisonment

Is this corrupt, or corrupt?

>>17418104

>Pss: THE PEOPLE WANT

Who the fuck are you claiming to know what people want?

WE WANT NO POLITICIANS AT ALL, because they are all corrupt as fuck. They are all liars. And power corrupts.

No parties, no politicians.

Fuck you.

>>17418136

Totally organic.

You are very fast in typing, or is it?

https://qresear.ch/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgab.com%2FElfReich%2Fposts%2F108656903162900301

>>16956306

>>16958768

>>16975582

>>17035342

>>17046073

>>17079580

>>17083588

>>17085228

>>17108715

>>17194119

>>17201406

>>17222844

>>17279155

>>17375361

>>17410542

I hope the money is worth it.

>>17418126

Sauce

>>17418150

>Hitler was waging war on the Rothschilds

Nah.

FamilY.

You think they let him go for "ransom" money without anyone at the top knowing?

hahahahaa

Was that head of the SS executed for high treason?

No?

To me it looks like an insanely high amount of "ransom" to fund the upcoming war.

Basically a public money transfer.

Bankers always fund wars.

All sides.

Without their funds, wars do not happen.

>>17418152

>Not an argument

That's your post, right.

>those 33s are just coincidences, and you can vote yourself out of military occupation

bruhahaha

>people voted

If you believe these "elections", then it was only (exactly) a THIRD only. Far from the hoax story you are broadcasting here.

All parties were bullshit and the actual problem is parties.

btw. why did your totally anti-establishment Hitler sign Weimar shit into law like income tax law (still valid today, weird isn't it)?

Why didn't your anti-establishment Hitler remove the mandatory public school shit, you know the one introduced after ww1.

And why wasn't Germany's vaccine CDC closed down by either him, or by the people who came afterwards? Very weird, you would think especially using Jews and other prison inmates for vaccine experiments would get you shut down after ww2, but just like forced labor nothing happened. Almost as if Nazis didn't lose.

>>17418165

So Hitler was a Zionist?

I would have been fine with hanging that pig.

>>17418173

>I never said Hitler did the right things (he should have exterminated the whole Rothschild bloodline

But you said earlier "all according to law".

Killing someone because of their bloodline is fine according to your law?

What kind of law are you talking about here?

Sounds illegal and stupid as fuck to me.

>>17418182

>a 1 year old baby is a traitor and deserves death

>no, I'm the good guy here, not evil at all

>>17418197

Another question would be, let's say you were tortured and treated like shit since the day you were born to break you.

And you broke.

Are you then responsible for everything you do afterwards, or are you not? Something in between?

It's like beating a doggo for years and when the doggo bites every human it comes into contact with, you go "bad doggo, we must now kill the doggo because doggo is obviously evil"

>>17418224

>the individual is always responsible

So every parent who allowed circumcision is guilty of genital child mutilation (U.S. Code § 116)?

Every parent that allowed even one single vaxx into their children is guilty of at least attempted manslaughter (U.S. Code § 3236)?

Good to know.

>>17418246

Okay, so let's take SCRIPTure like the biblerino.

"You shall not kill".

Does this include attempted killings too?

If so, then vaccinating is an attempted killing, because poisoning is attempted killing.

Or does it only count when you do it knowingly?

Doesn't matter that the info was out there and that you were ignorant?

Or take the law of nature, were somewhat everything is basically fair game. Poison fine.

>>17418262

Which one is the correct translation?

>>17418263

Your interpretation.

"Kill"

"cause the death of (a person, animal, or other living thing)."

>>17418271

>"study"

So which one is the correct translation?

Or did you read "the original"?

How do you know that it's "the original"?

inb4

>just study

So you are full of shit and can't answer simple questions.

>>17418275

What's killing without hatred?

Let's take for example a child that was tortured and raped during childhood, which can't feel any emotion anymore.

According to you such a child after growing up can do WHATEVER IT WANTS TO and it's fine, because no hatred.

"We will just make the corn more expensive, yup, a few people may die, but I don't hate these people, My job is to make more profits, so it's fine. I'm not killing them out of hatred of ill will. In fact I'm not even directly killing them.".

>>17418281

>the same way you "know" e=mc²

So now you are making shit up.

Einstein was a evil bastard, who left his family (wife + child) to fuck his niece.

I don't trust such people at all, so no.

>haha, I just know, you see

So you didn't study it, and you are full of shit.

Thanx.

>I feel that I'm right

Like virologists.

>>17418287

>no answers, more bullshit

>it's….it's "killing without hatred

Getting called out for it and questioned

>noooo, that's too simplistic now

You were the one coming up with this simplistic "killing without hatred", whatever that even is supposed to mean, and it's not the words in your bible anyway. It's stuff you made up.

Let's pretend the biblerino is real and deal and it literally says you shall not kill, maybe that really means you shall not kill, no animal, no human, no nothing.

>but but I ate food, and that's okay because I like meat

>and thus I indirectly killed, and thus I would be guilty, and I'm not guilty because biblerino, so the biblerino must have meant something else

>>17418298

>the original is the correct one and I know that because 404

>You see I can translate it back and it matches according to the data I have

>implying language wasn't created by the powers that be

Where did you get the translation data from?

From school?

From the internet?

From books?

ha-ha

We are talking about a conspiracy probably older than 5000 years.

The biblerino could have been a man made way to control people, and it sure looks like it.

And right now it's kinda weird, because Revelations is played, which means

a) it's just a coincidence

b) some people are acting that way because it just needs to happen (acting according to SCRIPT)

c) it's simply their SCRIPT(ure)

And just like 9/11, when one part is obviously controlled, the rest is controlled as well. Simple logic.

>>17418307

>eternal hal-fire

See, now that's FEAR.

And fear porn is what the powers that be do best.

It's their way of CONTROL.

>>17418304

You claimed I would "know" "e = mc²"

And I told you no, you are wrong about that.

I don't repeat what untrustworthy people that fucked their niece did (fucking their niece, sounds like what Hitler did as well, coincidence?)

Maybe you are into niece fucking too, idk.

>>17418315

Chance is highly likely that you would get divorce raped in the current times, and you will be broken poor and alone in the end.

>surrounded by

masked people, because must comply with covid mandates, kek.

Tell me what did you do against that?

Probably nothing.

And so a fictional normal becomes the new normal and you stick with it, because wife and family and "i just had no other options, I have a family you see". I know the excuses, it's getting boring.

>>17418319

>historical records

Books?

>books can't be faked

ha-ha

>you bitch

What an argument, that really showed me

I wonder why the powers that be burned tons of books ages ago.

>believe in his story, it's documented scientifically in his-storical RECORDS that were authorized by authority and are told in public school

Funny guy.

I'm not pretending to know. It oculd all be fake. I don't know. and you don't know which biblerino is real, and if there even is any real biblerino and if it was just a way to control people.

>but my God is real

>no, my God is real

>YOU WILL BURN IN HELL_FIRE

Sounds like fear porn to me, but that's just me.

>GET YOUR CLOT SHOT, otherwise you WILL die a very painful death

Same way of control.

>>17418323

I feel so

bored

I don't

know why I write in

such

weird ways

>just trust me, brah

nah

>>17418332

>I died before

>I died a true® death

>Trust me, brah

>I was resurrected, that's how I know®

>and in fact I got historical records from back then

>yes, it's all in my head you see, so it can't be fake

>>17418338

What I find weird is that a judge would not check on the allegations of the children at all, but instead even give him full custody, despite medical records saying otherwise (assuming those aren't fake, but they do exist, and Google even tried its best to hide them).

I repeat give full custody to a MAN despite these allegations.

Imagine a typical man getting accused of even just rape, would that typical man get full custody and no one checking anything?

No, that man would probably go to jail regardless. Custody? Never.

Also maybe the resolution is not high enough, but I don't see tears. I see sniffles and eye rubbing, but no tears.

>>17418345

>backed by its own labor

What is that even supposed to mean.

>its own

implying Germany isn't a country, but a bug farm.

And why would they accept trillions of ransom money for one single person, when that money would not be worth anything at all because of "their own currency"?

>Kind of goes against your "funded both sides" doesn't it.

There were 3 sides, unless you combine US + Germany, which would make sense because for example Bush funded Hitler/Nazis, then it would be basically 2.

>War was made on Germany

It was and is occupied by military.

What you are saying makes no sense.

>poor Germany

>just invaded countless of European countries

>wait, they were forced to do that, and disarm the populations, but that's okay, because they freed the people, because nothing screams freedom than getting your weapons for self-defense taken away and getting murdered.

>there was an international blockade, but you know you can still buy shit with trillions anyway

???

TRUST.

>>17418354

>1. killing one man in a petty act changes nothing.

Remember laws and pretending to be a state of law?

Why no trial?

>but that would have changed nothing

So good, no trials anywhere anymore, because trials never change anything at all.

Instead accept money and release the prisoner when you get enough monies.

Now it's weird that they put basically all other Jews into camps and even took their monies from them, but I guess that's another story and totally makes sense.

And you can't let a normal Jew go even for tens of hundreds of thousands of monies. That would be far too cheap for the "state of law".

>b) have been a betrayal of his stated positions to the public

Fiction: "these Jews with their lies and their banks"

Reality: "Oh? That much ransom money? Well Good day Mr. Rothschild, we will let you go. Hope you had a nice stay. But you, the remaining other Jews, we will lock you up in camps instead for forced labor, yup we took every money and goods from you, but forced labor it is. Don't complain that the banker didn't had to do forced labor, he's a VIP"

>3. letting prisoners go, is a COMMON gesture of goodwill, to avoid more serious conflict.

>but we couldn't let the Jews go, because we needed their forced labor and the medical experimentation, not with the banker of course, he's way too valuable for forced labor + medical experimentation.

Followed by:

>yes, Germany is now Nazi-free

>Elites forced the Jews to do forced labor?

>who gives a fuck, we will let them go.

>get that illegally obtained money and give it to the Jews?

>Nah, they can keep it all, it's fine. Forced labor is not a problem at all.

>And these judges who ruled and sent people to their death?

>Nah, we will not hang them, it's fine. It was law after all, we will let most of them continue working here.

>and the CDC of Germany with their medical experiments including vaccine trials? Nah, that was also okay. They killed people including the Jews? No big deal, we will not close them down. We will not even rename them. Robert Koch is the ideal name for a scammy and lying institute like this, based on fraud and criminal acts.

It gets obvious when you want to see.

Z

>>17418364

>we just had to

Imagine Hitler would NOT have invaded all sorts of European countries.

He would not have done any of that.

inb4

>but but Austria

Ok, go in, get the Germans out, get out

>but but it was our land before the war

You lost it fair and square.

It's playing a poker game and then getting your money back that you lost by using a gun.

Now imagine all of that.

Germany simply only taking care of itself, not pulling any other bullshit.

And allowing Germans to home school again.

Removing all taxes.

But the opposite happened.

>The "Nazis" got limited financial support from non-Jewish friends around the world.

So Bush family are the good guys now?

btw more questions:

Why was Bush family not going to trial for supporting them?

Why were Nazis in South America not hunted down?

Some even lived down their under their real names.

None of it makes sense unless it was a show at the top, just like politics today.

>>17418373

>No such act exists

Sending them to their certain death (10+ million of them) is not betrayal?

Sending basically kids to the front lines is not high treason either?

>but he just had to

>EVERY single act Hitler took, is consistent with what he said he would do

>letting a top banker go for tons of ransom money is what he said he would do

>because money is more important than anything else

>trials? don't change anything, so they are irrelevant

>Hitler was in Vienna in 1913? Just like Stalin and others? That was just a coincidence. It happens that totally randomly upcoming very powerful people live in the same city, basically next to another. It just happens, don't think about it.

>>17418385

>1. What law had he broken?

What's funny is that le Nazis complained about the corruption of the other parties, and did the same shit but way worse.

Accepting money for a prisoner is literally corruption.

>but da laws, it was totally legit

Be the corrupt ones in control

Can do everything "legally"

I'm sure the confiscation of the wealth and monies of the Jews was also totally "legal".

And the vaccine experiments, JUST LIKE THE ONE ATM, is totally "legal" as well.

>2. For your case to be won, that Hitler betrayed Germany by allowing a Rothschild to leave

It gets way more complex than that.

It's just the most obvious form of corruption and showing their true colors.

>da Jews

>ah wait, this banker Jew is fine, let him go, trial? Nah, forced labor? Nah, just let him go

And you slurp it up.

>murder

I never said murder, you are about murdering people. I'm not.

I would have wanted a trial.

But anyhow, it doesn't even make any sense to release him.

>they offer that much for him?

>let's keep him as a VIP to protect us

inb4

>but they were SO honest people, that they went for corruption instead, but at the same time kept the other Jews in camps, because honest people take normal people to camps for forced labor

>As for other Jews "being put into camps", the US, UK, Australia and others all did the same thing

>DEY DID THE SAME!!! SO IT DOESN'T MATTER

Almost like covid mandates, isn't it.

Almost as if someone at the top pulled the strings.

And somehow ultra rich people weren't touched, neither by Hitler, nor by anyone that followed.

Isn't that weird.

>partisan combatants

Yeah, regular old Jews would have thrown molotov cocktails, but the big fat banker that was let go, that one couldn't have caused any harm. It was the 60+ year old Jews in the camps that would have been partisan combatans.

In fact the countries that le Nazis "freed", lots of combatant partisans in there, somehow they defended their countries, wait, went against the Nazi freedom, and were sometimes beheaded for that.

Totally not evil, nah, that's freedom you see.

>>17418422

>yes, everyone wanted to attack us

>we had no other chance than attacking everyone around us

>we were the good guys, though

>Germany COULD NOT just sit there and let itself be destroyed.

MILITARILY OCCUPIED.

You can't vote yourself out of that.

>he pleaded

>like Bush pleaded and pleaded

>he really didn't want war, but war it is

No politician (liar) every "wants war" is a PR trick, and you keep falling for it.

>The traitors were on OUR side, not the German one.

There were no sides. All controlled for a nice mass genocide ritual.

>but but elections matter, they weren't fake back then

You are a fool.

>>17418433

>If only everyone would vote Republican, it would be over.

Nazis were probably the first that used the TV mass hypnosis, just like with covid.

Germany was and is an open experiment.

https://historyofyesterday.com/nazi-tv-65daef8aeeb4

but it was Nazi Germany that introduced the world’s first regular television service and it was Nazi Germany that first used television to push a message.

EXPERIMENT.

Not even invented there, but used there.

EXPERIMENT.

>>17418457

I'm waiting for accusing POTUS for "the vaxx".

And maybe it's not even actually mRNA, but simply all the garbage they put in regular vaccines.

That would be glorious, it would end [all] vaccines in a nano second.

>>17418513

>MOSSAD did some hunts in Argentina.

Was proven fake and gay, at least the one with Eichmann involved.

They came after he was arrested by another party and got him out. He should have gone to Germany, but instead they got him a trial in Israel and got rid of him in one way or another.

>>17418523

>at least the one with Eichmann involved.

Sauces with original documents from Argentina.

Eichmann even used his real name, which was ridiculous, unless he felt safe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORjoVqB0Lew

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne2yL8rhLWw

>>17418526

>What counts is not whether a government creates media for the masses

A government is never trustworthy.

>What did the "nazis" encourage that was bad?

Hating fellow German citizens, avoiding them because of health reasons. Reporting them to authority.

Sounds similar to COVID.

>>17418544

If every Jew did what you say (they didn't), then why did they release the fat banker Jew, who must have done the same according to your brainwashed brain?

And why invent fake and phoney health reasons like covid?

>>17418560

>Didn't say every Jew did

So your reply to my post saying:

"hating fellow German citizens, avoiding them because of health reasons. Reporting them to authority."

was garbage.

>make decent posts

>while shitposting himself

t. retard

What's the reason for the health lies again?

And why would good guys lie about something like that, especially against GERMAN CITIZENS?

And why would they continue with the vaccines despite having thrown all your Jews out.

Should that have ended vaccines?

You sound like someone who could defend the current COVID regimes as well, it's the same thing.