Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial lawyers sue her family over unpaid legal bills
Socialite's former attorneys claim her family conspired to hide her wealth and owe hundreds of thousands of dollars
Josie Ensor - 24 August 2022
Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial lawyers are suing the Maxwell family over hundreds of thousands of dollars in unpaid legal bills, alleging they conspired to hide her wealth.
Maxwell’s former attorneys at legal firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman (HMF) on Monday filed a civil suit against the British heiress, her brother Kevin and her estranged American husband Scott Borgerson, claiming they worked together to shield her assets so they could not be used to pay legal fees.
The Colorado-based firm, which represented Maxwell in previous lawsuits brought by victims of her former boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein, is suing for $850,000 (£720,000).
Only one member of her legal team, Bobbi Sternheim, who works for a different firm, does not appear to be named as a plaintiff in the suit.
According to Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, Ghislaine told the legal team Kevin Maxwell would be handling the payment for their services. However, they quickly “developed concerns about Ms Maxwell’s willingness and ability to meet her financial obligations.”
They claim they asked for a $250,000 pretrial retainer soon after her July 2020 arrest by the FBI on charges of sex trafficking. Around half of it was paid promptly.
HMF emailed Mr Maxwell asking for updates regarding the $140,000 they owed. Mr Maxwell reportedly ignored the emails.
“As 2021 progressed, Ms Maxwell fell consistently behind on her obligations to HMF. When HMF raised concerns, Mr Maxwell routinely assured the firm that he would satisfy the outstanding invoices,” reads the filing to the Denver court, first spotted by Australian podcaster Jen Tarran.
“To keep HMF from withdrawing, Mr Maxwell made a handful of sporadic payments.”
As her November 2021 trial neared, HMF asked for a larger $1 million retainer in “recognition that Ms Maxwell’s trial would be a complex and extended ordeal that would require HMF to advance substantial costs, divert the firm’s resources from other matters, and require turning away other potential clients.”
When that was not paid, on November 5 they threatened to end their representation. Mr Maxwell followed up by reiterating “the commitment we as a family have made to honour the fees due and requested by you both in good faith and as a binding commitment.”
Mr Maxwell allegedly told the firm that Ghislaine’s husband at the time, Mr Borgerson, controlled Maxwell’s assets and was responsible for delaying payments to the firm.
The legal firm claims tech entrepreneur Mr Borgerson formed two limited liability companies and used Maxwell’s money to buy two high-end condos in Boston and other properties in Massachusetts and New Hampshire in an attempt to shelter her assets.
In her second attempt to secure bail while awaiting trial, the 60-year-old offered the New York federal court a $28.5million bond package.
It was revealed that soon after their 2016 marriage she had put the majority of her $20.2m assets into a trust controlled by Mr Borgerson, which was now worth $22.02m.
Prosecutors said Maxwell's transfer of money to her husband showed her ability to "hide her true wealth" and claimed she had not been truthful about her assets in her initial financial disclosures.
The firm agreed not to drop her case. “HMF, relying on Mr Maxwell’s commitment, continued to devote all necessary resources to Ms Maxwell’s defense,” the attorneys wrote.
After Maxwell’s trial ended in a guilty verdict in December, more than $950,000 was due. In mid-January, Mr Maxwell paid HMF $143,500, but the rest, the firm claims, is still outstanding despite “assurances” the money would be sent.
When HMF informed Maxwell in prison that they planned to withdraw their services ahead of her sentencing hearing, the socialite reportedly pleaded with them to stay on her case.
“HMF has been damaged as a result of Mr Maxwell’s fraud in an amount to be proved at trial,” the firm finished by saying.
They are also suing Mr Borgerson for “wrongfully encumbering Ms Maxwell’s assets, joint marital assets, and/or assets committed to fund her defense, impairing her ability to perform her obligations.”
They claim Mr Borgerson and Maxwell “shared the motive of protecting those assets from creditors including HMF.”
HMF attorney Christopher Montville, who represents the firm in the case, did not respond to request for comment on Tuesday.
Maxwell is serving a 20-year-sentence at a low-security federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida. She has retained a new lawyer for her appeal.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/08/24/ghislaine-maxwells-trial-lawyers-sue-family-unpaid-legal-bills/
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/HMF-v.-Maxwell.pdf