>>17439826, >>17439829, >>17439833, >>17439840, >>17439840, >>17439864, >>17439890 Reminder Articles/Links: Vaccine authorization

Someone should do a video of all the times Bidan, CDC, FDA, politicians, media, movie actors etc touted how safe and effective the vaccines were, to include Bidan said the vaccine would not be mandated and then saying they are mandated and everyone needs to take them.

Now is the time major class action lawsuits will be enacted including all citizens that lost their jobs, their families, their lives to suicide, with the millions of others harmed irreparably, died, disabled forever. Every state that put elders in nursing homes should be sued and each person in authority to be sued

Sen. Johnson Leads Panel Discussion on Failed Response to COVID-19

August 4, 2022

WASHINGTON – On Wednesday, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) led a discussion of medical professionals at Hillsdale College in Washington, D.C. focused on the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine, federal health agency failures and adverse reactions.Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough joined Sen. Johnson on the panel.

Sen. Johnson’s opening remarks at the Hillsdale discussion can be found here and highlights are below.

On the Biden Administration’s failed COVID-19 response

“I don't see how anybody can take a look at the global response, and in particular, the United States response to this pandemic, to COVID, and call it a success. It was a miserable failure even by their own data. The little data that they actually provide the American public. Now, according to Johns Hopkins, we've suffered over a million deaths in the U.S. out of 6.4 million globally.”

On the impact of COVID-19 on children

“And speaking of children, look at what we did to our children. I think the science is pretty solid that the masks didn't work. They never were going to. Maybe marginally, you know, a couple of percentages. But I'll tell you, one group of individuals we knew upfront masks would never work on was children. Have you ever seen kids wear masks? And yet today we have school systems about ready to open up and probably going to impose masking on our children because the pandemic isn't over. Think about that.”

On the “COVID cartel”

“The COVID cartel, let me define the COVID cartel for you. It is the Biden administration, it's the federal health agencies, it’s big pharma, it's the legacy corporate mainstream media, and it's the big tech social media giants. That is the COVID cartel. They are the ones that have sabotaged early treatment. They are the ones that have done the censoring, that have limited freedom of speech. They are the ones because of that censorship, because of that sabotage, I would hold largely responsible for the deaths of what do you say, doctors, how many hundreds of thousands of Americans that died because of lack of early treatment?”

On the importance of COVID-19 investigation and discussion

“So I've rambled on long enough. I really want to get to the doctors here. But what I want to sus out of these doctors is first: complete to a certain extent, what we weren't able to complete in my January 24th of this year event COVID 19: A Second Opinion. We structured that around Dr. McCulloch's four pillars to address the pandemic. Try and limit the spread, early home treatment, hospital treatment and then vaccines. We just ran out of time. We barely scratched the surface, never got the vaccine. So I want to I want to talk about what we know about the vaccines that the media, the COVID cartel, is not conveying to the American public. The American public is not fully informed as they're making these decisions.”

https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2022/8/sen-johnson-leads-panel-discussion-on-failed-response-to-covid-19

Congressman Roger Marshall, MD sends a letter to HHS to preserve all records of Fauci, Collins etc.

HHS and NIH have been found to have shredded, burned, destroyed official records and NARA reports they refuse to turn over all information. Oh and these agencies are self policing, very few Congressional requests are ever fulfilled and FOIAs are only honored if they are taken to court.

So my question is when are these officials homes, offices, etc going to get raided and prosecuted?

GOP Sen. Marshall asks HHS to preserve Fauci documents

"I ask that you immediately confirm that HHS is preserving these records"

Kansas Republican Sen. Roger Marshall sent a letter on Tuesday to Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra asking him to preserve documents and communications connected to Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Fauci announced on Monday he would retire as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and as a White House adviser. He rose to prominence as a global health icon during the COVID-19 pandemic but also became a lightning rod for conservative criticism of stringent lockdown policies.

Republicans have vowed to investigate Fauci and his department over their handling of the pandemic. Marshall, in his letter, sought to preserve documents that may aid in that endeavor.

Roger Marshall letter to Xavier Becerra

"I write with this official notice for you to immediately take steps to preserve all records and information related to Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins currently within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and component agencies," Marshall wrote to Becerra.

"HHS and component agencies, including NIH [National Institutes of Health] in particular, continue to obstruct numerous congressional investigations through refusal to provide responsive information. In additional to withholding information from Congress, private parties note that NIH refuses to comply with Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests until forced to do so by court order," he continued.

"It is imperative that all HHS and component employees and officials are advised of their legal responsibilities to collect, retain, and preserve all documents, communications, and other records in accordance with federal law," Marshall went on.

"I ask that you immediately confirm that HHS is preserving these records by providing all orders, notices, and guidance given to all HHS staff regarding preservation of information related to these matters and individuals," he concluded.

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/gop-sen-marshall-asks-hhs-preserve-fauci-documents

Homeland Security officially terminates agency's Disinformation Governance Board

Updated: August 25, 2022 - 10:41am

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has terminated the agency's Disinformation Governance Board and rescinded its charter.

Mayorkas officially ended the Department Homeland Security board Wednesday after the agency's advisory committee issued an interim recommendation last month that "there is no need" for the board.

The committee said Wednesday that there is "no need" for the agency to have a separate Disinformation Governance Board but the issue of disinformation is "critical" to the department.

Homeland Security does not "have the authority to silence or sanction anyone’s speech" but should focus on determining whether "publicly disseminated disinformation impedes missions assigned to the agency" and "disseminating correct information," the board said.

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/dhs-terminates-disinformation-governance-board

This was supposed be done in May/June, why did Mayorka keep it open for a couple of more months?There’s no way he stopped this he farmed it out to social media and non profits guaranteed!

Job Creators Network explores legal challenges to block Biden student loan bailout

The Job Creators Network, a small business advocacy group, is exploring legal challenges to block the Biden administration's student loan bailout.

"This move is fundamentally unfair to the tens of millions of hardworking Americans who never went to college and are now forced to shoulder loan forgiveness for the consultant class," group President and CEO Alfredo Ortiz said Wednesday, shortly after Biden's announcement.

"It’s also unfair to those who have scrimped and saved to repay their student loans. They already paid back their student debt, and now they will be forced to pay back the growing national debt as a result of this bailout."

Ortiz called the loan bailout "illegal" and said it would add to the national debt and fuel inflation.

Some critics have argued the bailout is classifies as government spending, which a U.S. president doesn't have the legal authority to authorize.

Ortiz also said that rather than addressing skyrocketing college costs, the executive action transfers taxpayer dollars from average Americans to high earners with secondary education degrees,

"Forgiving debt incentivizes colleges to continue raising costs and borrowers to continue not paying back loans," he also said. "Everyday taxpayers are stuck with the tab."

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/biden-admin-faces-possible-legal-challenges-student-loan-bailout

Taxpayer bill for Biden student loan bailout could reach $600 billion, warns budget watchdog

Part 1 of 2

President Joe Biden's unilateral plan to cancel up to $20,000 of student debt for certan borrowers will bust the federal budget, send historically high inflation rocketing still higher, and saddle taxpayers with up to $600 billion dollars in new debt, budget watchdogs and GOP lawmakers are warning.

A Wharton study estimates that Biden's plan will cost about $300 billion in taxpayer funds. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget put the estimated cost of the cancellation plan between $400 and $600 billion.

When factoring in the student loan payment moratorium during the pandemic, the organization estimated that Congress has spent "between $700-$900 billion on student debt cancellation and relief since the start of the pandemic."

"This announcement is gallingly reckless — with the national debt approaching record levels and inflation surging, it will make both worse," said CRFB President Maya MacGuineas. "Policymakers have already spent $300 billion on student debt relief — none of it paid for, and this would add another $400 to $600 billion, again none of it paid for. This action by the White House is completely at odds with their talk of deficit reduction. It could add twice as much to the deficit as was just saved from the Inflation Reduction Act, completely eliminating any deficit reduction and then some. With the stroke of a pen, the president undid a year's worth of work on the fiscal front."

MacGuineas said the cost of college tuition is a "huge problem" in the U.S. that needs to be addressed, but Biden's plan isn't the way to do it.

"Forgiving $10,000 to $20,000 per person is costly and appears to be more of a political stunt than anything close to good policy," she said in a statement. "It would do nothing to actually make education more affordable, and if anything, this policy will drive up tuition costs while raising prices on a variety of other goods and services for ordinary Americans."

Alabama Republican Rep. Mike Rogers said the nation is "already struggling with record-high inflation and a recession" and Biden's "student debt scheme will only force Americans, who have already paid off their debts or who did not take on student debt, to foot the bill for his socialism."

Virginia Republican Rep. Virginia Foxx, ranking member of the House Education and Labor Committee, described Biden's plan as a debt forgiveness scam.

"President Biden will say and do anything to appease his radical progressive base, even if it means bankrupting our country and kneecapping taxpayers in the midst of an inflation crisis," she said in a statement. "This is a slap in the face to those who never went to college, as well as borrowers who upheld their responsibility to taxpayers and paid back their loans. It's a signal to every freshman stepping foot on campus to borrow as much as they can because taxpayers are picking up the tab."

She suggested that Congress should pass the Responsible Education Assistance through Loan (REAL) Reforms Act to enact "responsible reforms to the federal loan program."

Biden is "forcing hardworking American taxpayers to pay for his student loan cancellation scheme," said Rep. Elise Stefanik, House GOP Conference chair.

"In the midst of skyrocketing inflation and a recession, the Biden administration once again doubles down on its reckless spending at the expense of the American people," added the New York Republican.

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/republicans-slam-biden-circumventing-congress-enact-inflationary-student-debt

>>17440947

Taxpayer bill for Biden student loan bailout could reach $600 billion

Part 2 of 2

"President Biden's student loan debt forgiveness scheme is an insult to the millions of hardworking Americans who have worked so hard to pay off their student loans and other debts," echoed Georgia Republican Rep. Barry Loudermilk. "Not only does this decision raise legal concerns, it will also not help inflation and will cost American taxpayers an estimated $300 billion. This is yet another example of just how out of touch President Biden is with a majority of Americans who just want us to rein in out-of-control inflation, need affordable goods, gas, groceries, less crime, and secure borders."

Florida Republican Rep. Vern Buchanan said that Biden's "reckless, unilateral student loan giveaway is unfair to the 87% of Americans without student loan debt and those who played by the rules."

In the past, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the president doesn't have the unilateral authority to forgive debt.

House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, said Biden has shifted personal student loan debt onto taxpayers.

"This isn’t imaginary money," he said. "Biden just shifted all that student loan debt onto other taxpayers who are already dealing with high inflation. Debt 'forgiveness' is just another liberal scam for the elites paid for by working class Americans."

Ways and Means Committee Republicans cited Larry Summers, an economist who served as director of the National Economic Council under former President Obama.

"Even former Obama-Biden top economic advisor Larry Summers warned about Biden's mass student loan giveaway," they wrote on Twitter, quoting the former Treasury Secretary: "'Student loan relief is not free. It would be paid for. Part of it would be paid for by the 87 percent of Americans who do not benefit but lose out from inflation.'"

Democrats are applauding Biden's plan as a step toward making college more affordable, as tuition costs continue to rise.

"This is a good step forward to help millions of struggling borrowers, especially those from underserved communities working to make ends meet," said Democratic Rep. Juan Vargas.

Susan Rice, a White House domestic policy adviser, said on Wednesday that the U.S. Department of Education has the legal authority to unilaterally cancel student debt without congressional action.

New Mexico Democratic Sen. Martin Heinrich called Biden's debt forgiveness plan a "massive investment in America's working and middle class families."

The White House released a fact sheet on Biden's plan on Wednesday. Individuals earning less than $125,000 are eligible for up to $10,000 of forgiveness and up to $20,000 of forgiveness will apply to Pell Grant borrowers making under $75,000 annually.

Biden promised there will be a "short and simple form" available for debt forgiveness applicants released in the coming weeks. June 30, 2022 is the cutoff date for loans eligible for the forgiveness, according to Rice.

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/republicans-slam-biden-circumventing-congress-enact-inflationary-student-debt

WH cannot give exact estimate of student debt relief plan cost

The White House followed up on President Biden's announcement of the Student Debt Relief Plan, commenting that they could not estimate the total cost for the policy.

https://justthenews.com/videos/wh-cannot-give-exact-estimate-student-debt-relief-plan

Iran nuclear deal being pushed by Biden weaker than original version under Obama, analysts say

Updated: August 24, 2022 - 11:37pm

Part 1 of 3

"This is diplomatic malpractice to the point of being criminal," said Gabriel Noronha, who served as a special adviser on Iran at the State Department.

It's become common to refer to President Joe Biden's efforts to "revive" the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, from which his predecessor withdrew the U.S. in 2018. Indeed, Biden administration officials have for months defended their efforts to seek a "mutual return to compliance" with the accord to curb Iran's nuclear program in exchange for providing large-scale sanctions relief.

Such terminology, however, is inaccurate and even misleading, according to experts and former U.S. officials who spoke to Just the News. They warned the current deal being negotiated is an entirely different arrangement than what was finalized under former President Barack Obama, containing more U.S. concessions and serving Iran's interests in dangerous and enduring ways.

"It's structurally and technically a very different deal," said Gabriel Noronha, who served as a special adviser on Iran at the State Department. "It's more advantageous to Iran."

Noronha, who's had access to Iranian government documents and earlier this year was leaked key details of the nuclear talks by U.S. and European officials, pointed first and foremost to the type and breadth of sanctions on Iran that would be lifted under a deal.

According to a Foundation for Defense of Democracies analysis, the new deal would give Iran access to $274 billion in its first year and at least $1 trillion by 2030.

Experts told Just the News that Iran would allocate these funds as it did the first time, using the infusion of cash to increase its military budget and provide a windfall to terrorist groups and its network of proxies.

But this time, much of the most extensive — and controversial — sanctions relief would be unrelated to Iran's nuclear program.

Most notably, the U.S. is expected to abrogate multiple Trump-era executive orders, which will lift sanctions on dozens of individuals and entities without congressional review, according to people familiar with the matter. Most notably, the Biden administration would likely end Executive Order 13876, which imposed sanctions on the Iranian supreme leader's office and a host of Iranian officials accused of terrorism and human rights abuses. These sanctions were unrelated to Iran's nuclear program.

Iran didn't give any concessions in return for Washington's agreement to nix the executive orders, according to Iran International, which obtained a leaked report on remarks by Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Bagheri-Kani, from a recent closed-door briefing provided to journalists in Tehran.

"It's alarming how the U.S. is preparing to lift non-nuclear sanctions related to human rights, terrorism, ballistic missiles," said Jason Brodsky, policy director of United Against Nuclear Iran. "We're giving more and receiving less in return. As problematic as the 2015 deal was, this is even worse."

The Biden administration has pitched the nuclear deal to Congress and the American people as a narrow nuclear agreement that wouldn't inhibit America's ability to counter Iran's malign non-nuclear behavior.

However, throughout negotiations, Iran has made several demands unrelated to its nuclear program, including the removal of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), an Iranian military force, from the State Department's list of foreign terrorist organizations.

https://justthenews.com/government/security/analysts-iran-nuclear-deal-being-pushed-biden-weaker-original-version-under

>>17440976

Iran Nuclear…

Part 2 of 3

The Biden administration initially made some so-called non-nuclear demands, according to people familiar with the negotiations, such as discussing limits to Iran's ballistic missile program. Iran quickly refused, though, and U.S. negotiators dropped the issue.

In his leaked remarks, Bagheri-Kani reportedly boasted Iran disregarded around 11 deadlines set by the West throughout the negotiations, at one point dismissing top U.S. negotiator Rob Malley's threat to walk away from the talks — and noting Malley ended up staying.

"We take no for an answer, and Iran doesn't," said Noronha. "This is diplomatic malpractice to the point of being criminal. We've completely destroyed the credibility of the West as a negotiating partner with Iran. Any major company would fire you the first or second time for making these negotiating mistakes."

Three U.S. diplomats, including Malley's deputy, Richard Nephew, stepped down from the nuclear talks in late January in protest of concessions to Iran. The officials had wantedthe administration to adopt a tougher negotiating stance.

Perhaps the most striking example of the U.S. taking no for an answer was when, according to Iran International, Iran refused to accept a proposal that both countries not seek to kill each other's citizens.

The revelation comes amid an ongoing wave of alleged Iranian plots to murder Americans on U.S. soil.

"How can you negotiate with a country that can't refrain from plotting to kill Americans?" asked Fred Fleitz, a former CIA analyst and senior National Security Council official. "We are making a deal with the devil."

When asked about this and other reported U.S. concessions, the State Department denied conceding anything in negotiations.

"We are not negotiating in public and we are not going to respond to purported leaks from Iran," a State Department spokesperson said. "Reports that we have accepted or are considering new concessions to Iran as part of reentering the 2015 nuclear deal are categorically false."

The spokesperson added the administration is "encouraged" Iran appears to have droppedsome of its "nonstarter demands."

One of the U.S. citizens thought to be targeted by Iran is author Salman Rushdie, whom the Iranian government had for years sought to kill over writings it deemed blasphemous. He was stabbed multiple times before a speech in New York this month. Rushdie, 75, is alive but being treated for serious injuries.

A New Jersey man with an image of Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as the avatar on his email account was accused of attacking Rushdie. He pleaded not guilty to second-degree attempted murder and second-degree assault after a grand jury indicted him.

Following the attack, Iranian state media castigated Rushdie as an "apostate" responsible for "blasphemous" writings.

https://justthenews.com/government/security/analysts-iran-nuclear-deal-being-pushed-biden-weaker-original-version-under

>>17440985

Iran Nuclear…

Part 3 of 3

Noronha noted that one of the Iranian organizations set to have sanctions lifted under the new nuclear deal is the 15 Khordad Foundation, which offered a multi-million-dollar bounty for Rushdie's murder.

Another issue with the new Iran deal cited by analysts is the U.S. isn't insisting on an extension of the so-called sunset clauses, key limits on Iran's nuclear program that have specific expiration dates within the next decade.

"This deal is much shorter than what was negotiated in 2015," since the sunset clauses are that much closer, said Andrea Stricker, research fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. "Plus, given how advanced Iran's nuclear program has become, the breakout time to a bomb is much shorter."

Stricker explained that Iran's centrifuges, the machines that enrich uranium to be used for reactors and potentially weapons, won't need to be shipped out of the country or destroyed under the nuclear deal. They can be stored inside Iran.

By maintaining a larger nuclear infrastructure than in 2015, experts explained, Iran will be able to protect itself should the U.S. withdraw from the deal in the future by maintaining the ability to quickly ramp up its nuclear program as much as it wants.

"The structure of the deal is so Iran can go back to extorting the West with nuclear leverage," said Noronha.

Another concern is the prospect of Iran covertly conducting work on nuclear weapons.

"We know they have a covert nuclear program," said Fleitz, citing the vast archive of Iranian nuclear documents taken by Israel in 2018. The cache of documents, stored and hidden in Tehran, contained information on past weapons-related work.

Fleitz also expressed concern about an ongoing investigation by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, regarding traces of uranium it found at previously undeclared nuclear research sites three years ago.

"So far, Iran has not given us the technically credible explanations we need to explain the origin of many traces of uranium, the presence of equipment at places," IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi said Monday.

Many observers fear the Biden administration and European countries hoping to strike a nuclear deal will pressure the IAEA to drop its investigation, which could prove to be a roadblock.

Overall, critics see the new nuclear deal taking shape as one that will be short-lived at best and simultaneously fill Iran's coffers and enlarge its nuclear program.

"Biden had the opportunity to chart a different course, a more durable one with bipartisan buy-in," said Brodsky. "He didn't do that."

The White House didn't respond to a request for comment for this story.

https://justthenews.com/government/security/analysts-iran-nuclear-deal-being-pushed-biden-weaker-original-version-under