Tyb
Any source that accuses an abject other source of withholding intelligence information from the accuser, cannot be consistent when the accusation itself withholds intelligence information from the accused.
The FBI/DOJ is currently implementing an inconsistent logic, it is presenting itself as invoking a dialectic that it is BOTH correct, good, right, justified, is what it is, to withhold intelligence source information, AND that is incorrect, bad, wrong, unjustified, shouldn't be what is, to withhold intelligence source information.
Dialectic logic practitioners are right now in a checkmate.
They are outputting that what they themselves are doing, as to why the accused should be prosecuted, is the very structure they themselves are invoking.
A source accusing an abject other of withholding information, could ONLY logically do so by being 100% transparent of the intelligence methods to arrive at such an accusation.
It makes no systems sense to encode a logic that says it is BOTH correct AND incorrect for one source of intelligence to withhold intelligence from another source of intelligence.
Biden DOJ/FBI are in a self-imposed informational checkmate.
Their own logic of what the abject other is allegedly guilty of, is precisely what they are doing themselves in that very accusation.
If there is anything other than 100% unredacted transparency from within the accusing DOJ, then it cannot logically assert itself as the authority OVER information that it is itself negating.