the interrogator 'you must answer my questions' approach to board havoc is displayed last bread by the posts of the id of this post:

>>17470470 (lb)

who is trying to claim that there are secret Q posts from a couple of days ago.

and has proved nothing but talks as if there were.

but when questioned morphed into 'interrogator, you are guilty for not time-wasting by answering my leading questions'

to that ID:

if there really were a Q drop the other day why are you wasting your time doing discord with me when you could be doing Q 's bidding by telling us all an interpretation of the drops, and where we are now?

>>17470531

see five posts down.

>17470536

I do have screen caps of the 'newfag' name calling .

that anon was going on about 'tidy the ship' and that, to me, is discord shilling unless it comes from Q.

coming from a person who goes on about banning personas here because he imagines them as what he said last bread, to me that's just more discord.

and then to be one who goes on with what seems to be BS that Q did a drop two days ago, and when questioned goes into a discord dance with me with all kinds of 'answer the question.' as if he's in charge and I'm under interrogation, when I have the goods.

the thing that he igored was that the result of that was that Q said: if it doesn't have a trip code, then don't see it as a Q drop. or at least don't report it as such.

so they only have 1/2 the story and 1/2 the story isn't enough.

reading through that id's posts last bread clears it up. That's an obvious well known persona of shill-bot or assisted shill-bot.

>>17470641

on an anonymous board what are you worried about? it's a new bread, no one even knows who you are.

If I got it wrong, remember: everything is anonymous. what are you worried about?

>>17470706