wait are they talking about buying children?
doubt
found the clip where Donald J. Trump says the Plane couldn't have gone through the steel latticed wall of the Tower.
It's immediately and on the fly, so he postulates there was some other factor that allowed it to 'fly through the wall'
yes, he's has a genius; anybody who says he's stupid is seriously underestimating him.
https://tora3.com/video/407b683591f52446709c66af436fd535
Continuous Pieces #11
the 'expert' in crashes/ accidents at the end o this? thought about it. bizarre. He thinks because the aircraft didn't crash there, if that was the case, the Towers would still stand.
Didn't 'get the fact' pancake collapse too is impossible given the speed of the dustification. and paucity of the 'pile'
DENIAL ; anon knows what it is, has done it, experienced it.
It could be from being overwhelmed; not being able to process the information?
also there's an effect where people refuse to believe they could be wrong; they initially refuse something 'outside the box' -
makes 'unpacking the box' too daunting?
emotionally overwhelming?
My tentative theories from doing it myself and running into it throughout my research:
Denial re; RED MAN BAD?
so much already invested in 'hate Trump' there's mental inertia
as far as 'planes hitting the Towers'
someone said 'well are the Towers still there then?" as a retort to the impossible TV depiction;
since they hadn't unpacked the part about the aircraft being unable to do what was depicted / suggested to the Towers, either.
So they rule out 'impossible collision' rather than 'impossible pancake collapse.'
Per unreasonable Trump hate; interviewees may see beyond the lies forcing clot-shots, but fail to reason from the "they lie about a eugenics program" but still believe Trump is vile and guilty of something.
'but I saw him say Mexicans are rapists'
(same as they 'saw planes hit the Towers') [TV Fakery]
or 'plane parts on the lawn of the Pentagon' (which there's no images of)
They create the pictures in their own minds, from the trigger / prompt of the Propaganda narration.
(in the case of the 'planes hitting the Towers' a few people I know and know of knew it was impossible depiction from the moment they saw it, and just reasoned that it was the Network putting forward a 'recreation' or 'simulation' and didn't realize until later that the Networks expected you to believe that was real; They assumed at first that it was 'historical recreation'
(anon never watched the videos, since I never watch TV and just followed what went on second hand - via internet chat)
Doesn't matter how much of an expert you are (officially), if you refuse to examine the evidence (denial) you can easily make a very stupid mistake.
In Trump-Hate, as in 'Planes hitting the Towers' the deniers already "know", since the alternative is too vast and unfathomable - and is too taxing to their emotional system.
Maybe solves the mystery of why BIG LIES work better; the alternative to the lie is so overwhelming that the confrontation with possible alternative causes denial?
It's emotional, not logical. (explains why it is dispassion and detachment are necessary for reasoning?)
No matter how high the IQ , emotions can block knowledge?
Uneducated-by-the- system-people have an easier time immediately and instinctively recognizing a stupid lie?
So it's rumored.
Having a specialty in a field doesn't seem to help except for the rare individual?
https://tora3.com/video/407b683591f52446709c66af436fd535
his daughter in law posted to twit that he didn't win and they all know it?