Tyb
Shills envious of Enoch, kek
Sorry, but just have to say I fucking hate Telegram.
You have to be really REALLY envious to spew venom at Enoch for getting Q'd 30 times.
Cope.
The FBI didn't take his phone because they wanted the data.
They already have everyone's data.
They wanted to show they can do this to him because they're petty bitches who raid women's closets to sniff their panties.
You sound scared, kek
>Enoch's just gets on my nerves because he is so full of himself
No, he gets on your nerves because you're full of yourself but because your fragile ego feels bruised in not getting what Enoch receives, you project your own 'full of yourself' onto Enoch.
Citing, reposting, they all each count as one instance of getting Q'd.
I'm not Enoch, I just love watching shills full of themselves screech at popular patriots who helped advance the Q movement.
Cope.
False.
Getting your social media post linked to is also getting Q'd.
Nice try redefining the language to artificially reduce the number of Q's Anons get.
Don't conflate Favorably linked vs. Unfavorably linked, you glowfaggot.
Semantics is a game for morons.
"Q you" is an artificial constraint.
Q's include QR and also from outside.
Where you post is irrelevant, if Q links to you, that's being Q'd.
For some people, it's always a good thing.
THE IRON LAW OF WOKE PROJECTION NEVER MISSES
Pocahontas accuses DeSantis of EXACTLY what the Democrats are doing with people!!!
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/warren-furious-desantis-new-low-shipping-migrants-marthas-vineyard
>That means a ton of MSN companies and rando journalists (some that hate Q) got a shit ton of Q yous.
So now you're redefining being Q'd as only when you feel the link is to an 'approved' source?
Getting Q'd is getting Q'd, within that there are favorable and unfavorable Q's.
Enoch saying he was Q'd 30 times isn't refuted by saying Q sometimes unfavorably Q's someone.
The way you're going you're going to have to prove that Enoch was UNFAVORABLY Q'd, which of course you won't do, because you can't, kek
Simply defining the deep state as a "cadre of professionals" doesn't make it so.
Evidence shows the deep state likes to engage in treason.
Get a new script, Democrat stooge
Prove it, Anons ask for sauce
I agree with you BTW
What if Wolfgang Schäuble serves Payseur who holds the Chair?
Because there were no paleontologists.