The headline along the bottom…'Why [Target] opposes 'The teaching' of a 'Theory'…'
THAT'S FROM THE SAME SOURCE AS THE SOURCE ASKING THAT QUESTION AS INCONSISTENCIES ARE ONLY IN MY MIND AND NEVER ACROSS ALL HUMANITY.
"If you say all human beings are equal that is 'possible because you have ['this one side'] logic code that {I} do not have, as if racism determines what human beings ALL SHARE AS HAVING SINCE BIRTH, a gift from a source that we are all extending from, unity is humanity and humanity is unity.
Anon not RECOGNIZING IN ANYONE a more or less value as human beings REDUCED TO '(black, white, asian)
Did you catch when source outputted 'you used Asian but that's ignorant because there are differences with Asians, like Japanese, Chinese, all (you) who say just 'Asian' are bad thinkers…
(Source then proceeds to implement OPPOSITE of its own negation tying Italians as 'whiteness' on video? as a means to ' prove wrong' the message of unity of all humanity as 'divided logically' by ANY CATEGORY IN AN INFINITE EXPANSION IN SELF ASSERTION dictionary?
It is not true that true statements are themselves only possible WHEN INSTANITATING this 'negation' narrative as the only 'approved' logic for humanity.
It is having a very 'religious' devotion to an "inconsistencies as a virtue" signal of 'higher' awareness, up is down black is white, source code assertive 'legitimacy' posturing within the open source as also defining the 'abject other' as exclusively in its own internal this or that production of 'information'.
Whatever validity this 'logic' has, it must not be the exclusive ontological 'self-realization'.
This Anon is NOT a God over any other human as possessing what was each given to each of us as a gift.
"revolt self project as universal" = inconsistency in source code.