Today's PSA is brought to you by; Anons who are anonymous and don't post pictures of underage anime girls bordering on pedo in every single post in order to maintain an identity.
What you are experiencing is another hostile takeover of this board. This includes but is not limited to: Tranime, or Loli as they would not prefer to be called. This divisive little cunt harasses anons and post in excess of 50+ times per bread, dividing anons based on the unchecked arrogant narcissistic persona conveyed. This glowie has been in the kill box since Q replied to them once and in their only reply she was wearing an upside down cross which is commonly worn to broadcast a fealty to Satanism. Ref. the Chelsea Clinton posts. Qs only reply to tranime was this "All posts are connected. Graphic is key". After tranime replied laughing about "luring a dangerous animal into a trap".
Think about this for a second, all Q posts are connected. All posts about upside down crosses and symbolism. Notice the red shoes? Symbolism will be their downfall? Q told you that double meanings exist and that everything posted here has meaning. Q told you that some anons are injected. Q told you that every 3-letter agency was here. You think they just stopped trying all of a sudden? Think they magically disappeared? Think about that in juxtaposition to the fact this famefag has been the biggest divisionfag for the board in the past. You ever notice that they never posts a single positive thing? Nothing constructive? Only argues with anons and demeans them?
Why does the C_A keep a large database of Japanese style anime faces to use on public forums? Why do the highest post count shitposting shills along with single post ID hashes magically come out of the woodwork to the defense of an obviously divisive "board personality"? Watching all day long only to defend a specific identity when Q told you that anons were "selfless, nameless, faceless fameless and fearless"? Why do the same faggots like "smokingpepe2.jpg" always happen to be online to support them? Have the chans ever been about forming a consensus in supporting specific personalities?
Why are they trying so hard to defend this clown who deliberately breaks all protocols of chan etiquette? Why do they project that literally everyone who questions what's happening is either "Hivemind" or "OSS"? OSS was equally an divisive piece of shit, sorry that projection isn't going to work either. Why did the new BO immediately implement whitelisted tripcodes for bakers when Q specifically said not to? Why did he immediately implement per-post captcha when Q said it can be easily bypassed by those who seek to cause disruption? Why are they trying to make this place as shitty as possible for "anonymous" anons and a haven for famefaggots who are constantly negative?
Why do they use repetitive misdirection tactics like projecting "TL;DR"? Desperately want you to filter this? Why is it when anyone questions this obvious divisionfag that they are automatically ridiculed by an echo chamber here? Why are they trying to normalize pointing guns at people on here? What is the purpose of the consensus cracking circle jerk? Why can't the clowns come up with a single concerted intelligible response to defend this famefag and not resort to projection and ad hominem deflections? Why does the BO tell you to FILTER or IGNORE this baker if you don't like what's happening? Can you even see notables if you filter them? Does ignoring them create the optics of acceptance and evoke tacit consent? Why does the BO and BVs protect this little "board personality" cunt and prefer them to bake over everyone else and defend them above all others?
They want the handful of real anons to stop posting here so they can go unopposed in their gatekeeping control of information (notables). How do you lure a dangerous animal into a trap? You let them think they run this board. Q told you already, infiltration vs invasion.