>>17597549 Was NordStream being used for something other than petroleum? (PB)
Interesting, when I first looked into maglevs decades ago, I envisioned a transatlantic conduit in which, for the most part, the train operated within a vacuum, thus reducing drag and giving almost unthinkable velocity. Anon must confess that it never occurred to anon that a scaled down version not operating within a vacuum would ever be used for personal transport. I guess anon only considered the macro level.
>If you believe all this shit, Q has not stopped anything. This just makes the Deep State Richer and sucks dry all our 401K's
You truly believe these words?
I thought not, faggot!
A question if I may; do you still trust the pay check at the end of the month?
I'd be a little concerned if I were in your shoes.
I bet you wear these …
with socks.
They go so well with second image.
>Will Don be back or is he gone?
Have you not heard that he plans on starting his own political party?
Anon kekked big time at the news.
lemonparty.org
Too late. The brain is already too fucked up.
> What did Q get in the win column ??
An army of weaponized frogs who have no sense of self and only seek the betterment of humanity?
Sounds like an awesome win to this anon.
>why she no have boobies?
Boobies are overrated when you other qualities that supersede them …
Oh fuck! She be fucked.
> you have other qualities
>Everyone watching CNN right now
I watched CNN once. It was when they first started during the first Gulf War. Anon kekked so hard at their cringe that anon never bothered tuning again.
> tuning in again.
Having pig reply to anon is like having a giant slug slide all over you, leaving a trail like a legless woman in heat.
It's attempts at attaining board mascot status are laughable at best.
It is a bubo on the anus of Qresearch.
Real anons are autistic, not retarded.
Major kek at the hands.
Funny how both responses are blank to me because they are already filtered. Who woulda thunk it?
Step the fuck down. Some of us actually give a fuck about what we do and provide red pills for our students to research without being too overt.
>did you know that's where the term "pigs" referring to cops was from?
Anon did not, but will take the claim with a grain of salt until anon confirms it.
Pigs and cops both being considered dirty is not a leap too far for this anon.
The idea of dirty cops goes back how far?
>if you have not read it,
Oh, anon has read it.
It is compulsory reading for all anons.
As is this question.