>>17624188 (pb)
No, the powers that be told you.
And you think they are "God".
It's their plans. That's it.
And their plans do not even make sense (will force everyone to take the mark and muh no one can sell or buy)
It's all about CONTROL.
>>17624198 (pb)
>Someone who were taught it themselves.
But you said it's all programmed, so which one is it now?
And if they "self-programmed", why can't I "self-program" too?
And why does your shitty AI not "self-program" itself?
A link to RFCs and it should be able to figure it all out. But that doesn't happen, because AI is a marketing term made out of bullshit.
>It might not be creativity as you or I understand it, but it has to come from somewhere.
It's stupid algos. Doesn't matter if you fully understand them or not.
>simulate creativity.
Nope.
Random shit is not creativity.
>It is in the eyes of the beholder.
which makes it pointless.
>Emotion is a crucial part in creativity.
But you just said AI would be creative.
>Simulating that could advance AI 100 times over.
You call algos AI. If AI was real, there would be no "advance" or whatever. And the first jobs replaced would be the expensive ones.
That's why AI doesn't exist.
>Alright, you are a programmer. Kek
Not my problem that you aren't into business programming.
You see there are languages that do not even allow all sorts of shit that is possible in C or C++. I can write in these, but I understand that they are badly designed languages.
That's why most of the code that I write is actually working perfectly, because it's very difficult to add errors.
>You have to start somewhere right?
If your goal is "that'll do", you shouldn't have that job to begin with.
>Are we back at, my AI isn't a perfect conciousness
You are making shit up now.
Algos are not AI. Full stop.
AI is a bullshit marketing term.
>Because that is not the intended goal of AI, then you would just use automation.
So your goal of "AI", which doesn't exist, is being a broken "that'll do" piece of crap?
Then the goal shouldn't be "AI" in the first place.
>No, you error correct.
You just said it wouldn't work perfectly. Now you "error correct" and what? Does that make it work perfectly?
>We've had one driving constantly here for over a decade now.
>one driving
>one
>How does that defeat my point?
Reality defeats it already.
>one
defeats it
>No, but AI is Algos.
No.
Algos are algos.
>Not the automatons that you keep calling AI.
You call algos "AI". You make less and less sense.
>if they already programmed you?
They didn't.
Stop making shit up about something you don't know shit about.
>Also, why I said parents AND caretakers.
I have no caretaker either, dumb fuck.
>Keep telling me what I believe.
Technocrats don't, they think they know, but they don't.
>I don't know what I made more complicated?
You seem confused.
>Incompetence.
You obviously never worked at a hospital.
>And this is a bad thing because, if the automation makes mistakes we can't error correct them?
"error correct", stop using bullshit terms that don't mean anything.
>I see no downsides to automating that, if the automation can reduce stress for the nurses
Because you are a dumb fuck.
I understand how the system works.
You obviously don't.
More things automated doesn't mean that the nurses will stay the same and have more time. There will be even LESS nurses, which will make the situation WORSE.
And the ones will have to take care of broken shit that doesn't work properly and waste their time.
>So because there can be things that can't be solved solely with automation, automation is invalid?
No, according to you photo identification should be "AI" and "AI" doesn't work properly.
That's a fact.
Even a child could identify these packages. A fucking child. And your "AI" fails.
>If the barcode is prestine
They are all new packages.
>it will work
in theory.
See, you are a bullshitter and not in reality.
And I never said that this automation ("AI" in your mind) would be bad, but that still doesn't change the fact that it doesn't work properly.
It works like ass and needs humans to fix it and take care of it.