>>17624246

>Today

>@SECGov

>, we charged Kim Kardashian for unlawfully touting a crypto security.

>>17624360

>>17624246

>Well, then there is this………………

>

>https://www.heritage.org/the-constitution/commentary/secs-house-enforcement-action-ruled-be-unconstitutional

The SEC is going to get their heads handed to them just like the EPA. They have exceeded their "Delegated Authority" by creating a new "Crime" of "Touting".

Can Kim come back after them for damages after the courts find it was an unlawful charge? Any takers?

>>17624707

The similarity of expression of the triggered lib is remarkable. Is it caused by some basal deformity or flaw in their brains?

It's not a normal emotional response like joy, friendliness, fear or terror. It's creepy and disturbing. Must admit I like the compilations though.