Anonymous ID: cb9631 Oct. 3, 2022, 10:31 a.m. No.17625549   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5573

Pfizer’s “Vaccine” Causes Astonishing Drop in Male Fertility – Men Have Not Been Informed nor Given Their Consent

 

When the Covid-19 vaccine rollout to the public began in late 2020, medical professionals, public health agencies, and government spokespeople all assured the public that the novel mRNA “vaccines” did not cause negative systematic effects on human bodies. They promised the public, many of whom were sceptical about the safety of a drug brought to market at “warp speed,” that the vaccines were “safe and effective.”

 

Those who questioned or challenged the “safe and effective” assurances were dismissed as “anti-vaxxers” and accused of wanting to kill others, especially the elderly. Few medical and public health experts spoke out about the need for long-term studies.

 

This attack on challengers to public health’s all-out push, and the resulting censorship of the emerging problem, resulted in catastrophic harm to male fertility.

 

The following is extracted from the article ‘Pfizer, FDA, CDC Hid Proven Harms to Male Sperm Quality, Testes Function, from mRNA Vaccine Ingredients’ by Amy Kelly, Program Director for the War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project as well as the COO of DailyClout. Find more by Amy Kelly HERE.

 

Pfizer’s own documents and other medical studies show:

 

Transfer of mRNA Vaccine Ingredients Between Humans

 

Pfizer knew that men can transmit the vaccine ingredients to their partners via sexual intercourse. Pfizer’s clinical trial protocol shows the company suspected that negative fertility impacts may occur in men, from its vaccine. Male trial participants had to follow specific “Male Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria.” These were spelt out in all fourteen versions of Pfizer’s protocol:

 

Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention, which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s).

 

A Phase 1/2/3, Placebo-Controlled, Randomised, Observer-Blind, Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 RNA Vaccine Candidates Against Covid-19 in Healthy Individuals, Protocol Amendment 14, 2 March 2021, pg. 213

 

Pfizer’s trial protocol required that men must:

 

Refrain from donating sperm.

Abstain from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing potential as their preferred and usual lifestyle. They must be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing age on a long-term and persistent basis and they must agree to remain abstinent. Or,

must agree to use a male condom when engaging in any activity that allows for passage of ejaculate to another person. In addition to male condom use, “a highly effective method of contraception may be considered in WOCBP (women of childbearing age) partners of male participants.”

 

In other words, the men in the Pfizer trial agreed to abstain from heterosexual intercourse with childbearing-age women or else, if they did have intercourse with women who could bear children, they agreed to use a condom and were advised to add an effective additional method of contraception. The Pfizer study constructs regarding total abstinence from sex with women who could bear children, or else the use of both condoms and other contraception, suggest that Pfizer suspected that vaccinated men’s ejaculate could affect both women and unborn children conceived during the trial or after.

 

https://expose-news.com/2022/10/03/pfizers-vaccine-causes-astonishing-drop-in-male-fertility/

Anonymous ID: cb9631 Oct. 3, 2022, 10:34 a.m. No.17625563   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5585 >>5594 >>5608 >>5612 >>5616 >>5673

They’re Coming for Your Food: New South Wales Government Expedites mRNA Vaccine for Foot-and-Mouth and Lumpy Skin Disease in Livestock

 

The government of New South Wales said on Wednesday that it had requested the American biotechnology company Tiba Biotech to speed up the development of the first mRNA vaccines for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and lumpy skin disease.

 

“The NSW Nationals in Government are taking the threat of FMD and Lumpy Skin Disease extremely seriously, and this milestone is another step forward in preparing for a potential outbreak,” said Paul Toole, Deputy Premier and Minister for Regional NSW.

 

NSW hopes to produce a world-first synthetic vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and lumpy skin disease by August 2023 with a $6 million government grant.

 

“I have now written to vaccine manufacturers to take up my challenge to develop both vaccines ready for use and manufacture in NSW by August 1 next year,” Toole said.

 

“COVID-19 demonstrated to us that all possible avenues in developing vaccines must be explored and we will leave no stone unturned.”

 

The partnership with Tiba Biotech, according to Agriculture Minister Dugald Saunders, provides New South Wales with an alternative strategy for creating mRNA vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease and lumpy skin disease.

 

“It is critical that we develop mRNA vaccines for FMD and Lumpy Skin as quickly as possible to protect our State’s livestock sector,” Mr. Saunders said.

 

“mRNA vaccines are cheaper and quicker to produce, highly effective and very safe,” he claimed.

 

“Because they are fully synthetic and do not require any animal or microbial products, they do not carry with them the same risks as traditionally derived vaccines.”

 

Tiba co-founder Peter McGrath said, “Our next generation RNA technology is able to safely and efficiently deliver vaccines for both human and animal health needs and has demonstrated more practical storage requirements than existing RNA technologies.”

 

The timing raises a lot of questions for some people as the Australia-UK free trade agreement (FTA) will go into effect this year, allowing tariff-free entry to increasing Australian meat volumes into the UK over the next decade.

 

They’re now coming for your food.

 

It can be recalled that researchers at the University of California were awarded a $500,000 grant from the National Science Foundation to develop technology that infuses experimental mRNA Covid-19 vaccines into spinach, lettuce, and other edible plants, as reported by The Gateway Pundit last year.

 

The team of nanobiotechnology experts is currently working on successfully delivering DNA containing mRNA BioNTech technology into chloroplasts, the part of the plants that instruct its cells’ DNA to replicate the vaccine material.

 

The researchers are tasked with demonstrating that genetically modified plants can produce enough mRNA to replace Covid jabs and infuse the plants with the right dosage required to eat to replace vaccines.

 

Experimental mRNA vaccines will be edible, Juan Pablo Giraldo, an associate professor in UCR’s Department of Botany and Plant Sciences who is leading the research explained in a press release published by the university on Sept. 16.

 

“Ideally, a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person,” Giraldo said. “We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens.”

 

Millions of people who have refused to get an experimental mRNA vaccine may soon be forced to consume the gene therapy in their food.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/10/coming-food-new-south-wales-government-expedites-mrna-vaccine-foot-mouth-lumpy-skin-disease-livestock/

 

Grow and eat your own vaccines?

Grant enables study of plants as mRNA factories

https://news.ucr.edu/articles/2021/09/16/grow-and-eat-your-own-vaccines

Anonymous ID: cb9631 Oct. 3, 2022, 10:35 a.m. No.17625572   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5616 >>5673

Supreme Court To Hear Case Challenging Tech Industry's Section 230 Immunity

 

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to weigh in on whether tech companies should be allowed immunity over 'problematic' content posted by users.

 

The case at hand alleges that YouTube aided and abetted the killing of an American in coordinated 2015 terrorist attacks carried out by ISIS, which killed 130 people. The family of one of the victims, Nohemi Gonzalez, has argued that YouTube's active role in recommending videos overcomes the liability shield for internet companies enacted by Congress in 1996 as part of the Communications Decency Act.

 

Section 230 of that act absolves online platforms of liability from content posted by users - and has come under fire in recent years, with the right claiming that it allows companies to inappropriately censor conservative views, and the left saying it allows social media companies to spread dangerous right-wing wrongthink, CBS News reports.

 

Gonzalez was a 23-year-old college student studying in France when she was killed while dining at a restaurant during the wave of attacks, which also targeted the Bataclan concert hall.

 

Her family is seeking to sue Google-owned YouTube for allegedly allowing ISIS to spread its message. The lawsuit targets YouTube’s use of algorithms to suggest videos for users based on content they have previously viewed. YouTube’s active role goes beyond the kind of conduct that Congress intended to protect with Section 230, the family’s lawyers allege. They say in court papers that the company “knowingly permitted ISIS to post on YouTube hundreds of radicalizing videos inciting violence” that helped the group recruit supporters, some of whom then conducted terrorist attacks. -NBC News

 

Lawyers for Gonzalez's family say YouTube's video recommendations were key to ISIS's ability to spread their message.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-hear-case-challenging-tech-industrys-section-230-immunity

Anonymous ID: cb9631 Oct. 3, 2022, 10:37 a.m. No.17625578   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5616 >>5673

Goldman Steps Up To Defend Credit Suisse: "Weakness Is Unwarranted"

 

There was a moment of levity this morning for those who opened Goldman's research portal, Marquee, when the bank's clients were greeted with an "encore" research report posting of the bank's August 2 downgrade of Credit Suisse to Sell…

 

.. a recommendation that has yield a return of over 25% in the past two months.

 

But lest Goldman be seen as actively seeking to push one of its biggest iBanking competitors into oblivion, the bank also sent out the following comment from its sales and trading desk on recent market color/conversations discussing Topic #1 in capital markets today: Credit Suisse. Here is an excerpt from the note sent out by Goldman's Sarah Cha discussing the comments from Goldman London-based trade Jonathan Weetman, who weakness in the stock unwarranted and explains why. To wit:

 

The unprecedented macro moves over the past couple of weeks have driven a lot of discussion around potential further cracks/weak spots from a market structure stand-point. Things continue to get hairier. For all the talk about relative outperformance in credit heading into last week, the UK GBP/Gilt dislocation seems to have changed the game there. From our credit colleagues over the weekend: “The 21bp move wider between 9/22-9/29 was the biggest move in the IG index outside of March 2020 since 2011 and a 99th percentile 5 day move since 2000. The only larger moves over a similar period of time came in some of the most extreme periods of stress ever (March 2020 (Covid), 2H ’08- Q1 ’09 (GFC), May 2010 & August 2011 (Euro Sov crisis with a little assist from US downgrade), September 2001 (9/11) and October 2002 (tech bubble)).

 

CS off 7% following online/social media speculation and multiple press articles over the weekend around what appears to be a risk-off mkt fueled negative feedback loop around capital position. Weetman calls the weakness in the stock unwarranted and walks through some of the considerations in his note this morning which includes:

 

the liquid balance sheet,

no Equities Prime business,

levered loans a very well covered bear point but that the composition & timing of a potential recap (he thinks consensus forming around CHF 4-5b) alongside IB restructuring the key question from investors.

 

As Weetman says:

 

“There is a lot of wood to chop in order to get a cap raise out the door. AM and SPG are reportedly for sale, and these processes take time even in easy markets. Cornerstone investors need to be found (the recent CS job promises in Qatar could be a sign). A strategic overhaul doesn't happen overnight, and management are relatively fresh in their jobs. An early strategic announcement is unlikely, and even 27 Oct looks a stretch. Bears love an info vacuum.”

 

(The full GS note available to pro subs in the usual place)

 

While not a full-blown defense, and certainly Goldman has yet to upgrade the stock from Sell to Neutral, let alone Buy, Goldman does note that the "weakness is unwarranted" - something it certainly doesn't have to do if it plans on buying up the bank's assets out of bankruptcy auction and can simply keep its mouth shut - and today's bounce from a record low may be as bad as it gets for the troubled Swiss lender… because if it isn't, then the government and ECB will have to step in since none of the management team's attempts to stabilize the selloff have worked.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-steps-defend-credit-suisse-weakness-unwarranted

Anonymous ID: cb9631 Oct. 3, 2022, 10:42 a.m. No.17625613   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5673

Letter Reveals UK Blackout Fear As NatGas Supplies Could Be Cut In "Emergency"

 

A letter from Ofgem, the UK's power regulator, warned about the "significant risk" of a natural gas shortage this winter because of disruptions to energy markets following the war in Ukraine and undersupply of Europe.

 

Bloomberg Opinion's Javier Blas tweeted a photograph of the letter focusing on technical changes in the UK electricity market. Blas highlighted the critical parts of the letter in the "background" section that detailed a dark and cold winter for the UK could be just ahead.

 

Here's what Blas outlined:

 

"Due to the war in Ukraine and gas shortages in Europe, there is a significant risk that gas shortages could occur during the winter 2022/23 in Great Britain ('GB'). As a result, there is a possibility that GB could enter into a Gas Supply Emergency."

 

… "In the event that GB reaches Stage 2 in this procedure, Firm Load Shedding of gas would be applied to the largest gas users connected to the gas system. This will likely be large gas-fired power stations which produce electricity to the National Electricity Transmission System ('NETS')."

 

Blas warned: "Winter is coming awfully quickly, and we are betting the house on a warmer-than-average season."

 

Blas is correct. The average UK temperatures are around 12 Celsius (53.6 Fahrenheit). The peak in mean temps occurred in early August.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/shocking-letter-reveals-uk-blackout-fear-natgas-supplies-could-be-cut-emergency

Anonymous ID: cb9631 Oct. 3, 2022, 10:43 a.m. No.17625622   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5650 >>5673

Ukrainian counter attacks on Kherson have failed – top official

 

The situation in the region is ‘under control,’ according to deputy head Kirill Stremousov

 

Attempts by Ukrainian forces to break through Russia’s defenses in Kherson Region have been thwarted, the deputy head of the local administration, Kirill Stremousov, has said.

 

In a Telegram post on Monday, Stremousov stated that “everything is under control in the Nikolayev direction,” despite Kiev’s efforts to retake the region. He noted that Ukraine’s forces had advanced southward along the Dnieper River to the village of Dudchany before “taking a beating” from Russian Aerospace Forces.

 

The official admitted that the Ukrainians were able to advance a little bit, but noted that the region’s defense systems were working and that “at the moment, the situation is completely under control.”

 

Stremousov concluded by urging people not to give into panic because of what they hear and read on social media. “This is not Kharkov, this is not [Krasny] Liman, we are holding the fence,” he proclaimed.

 

Russia’s Defense Ministry has also confirmed repelling the attack, stating that over 400 Ukrainian servicemen, 43 tanks and 89 units of special military equipment were eliminated in the Nikolayev-Krivoy Rog area.

 

The announcement comes as Kiev’s forces have mounted large-scale offensives along several points of engagement with Russia. On Saturday, Russian troops were forced to withdraw from their defensive positions in the town of Krasny Liman in the Donetsk People’s Republic after they were nearly encircled by Ukrainian forces, which had brought in reserves and reached a “considerable superiority in men and material.”

 

It has been noted, however, that the Ukrainian side has been suffering significant casualties in the offensive, having reportedly lost over 500 soldiers (200 dead, 320 injured), as well as ten tanks and 25 infantry fighting vehicles during the attack on Krasny Liman, according to the Russian Defense Ministry.

 

Kiev’s offensive comes after President Vladimir Putin signed treaties on the accession of the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, as well as the Russian-held regions of Kherson and Zaporozhye, into the Russian Federation on Friday. The move came after the four territories overwhelmingly voted in favor of joining Russia in referendums held between September 23 and 27.

 

Ukraine and Western nations have refused to recognize the results of the referendums and have vowed to never acknowledge the regions as being part of Russia.

 

https://www.rt.com/russia/563979-kiev-kherson-attack-repelled/

Anonymous ID: cb9631 Oct. 3, 2022, 10:47 a.m. No.17625638   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5673

Newly Obtained Emails Shed More Light on CDC’s False Vaccine Safety Monitoring Statements

 

Newly obtained emails show the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) made a false statement on COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring in 2021, months before agency officials gave false statements on the matter to The Epoch Times.

 

The emails also show top officials in the agency discussing performing safety monitoring on a key database for myocarditis, a form of heart inflammation that has been linked to the vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna.

 

The CDC promised in 2021 in a set of operating procedures to perform a type of analysis called Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) on reports of adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination. The reports are submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which officials have described as “the nation’s early warning system” for post-vaccination adverse events. The CDC also said in an updated set of operating procedures in 2022 that it would perform the analysis.

 

But the CDC has made false statements three times this year on PRRs, initially saying such analysis was outside the agency’s purview, then saying the analysis was performed starting in 2021, then saying the analysis did not begin until 2022. The newly obtained emails show that an official falsely said the CDC does not perform PRR analysis to an editor in 2021.

 

John Gregory, a health editor at NewsGuard, wrote to the CDC on Oct. 19, 2021, asking for a comment regarding a claim that the CDC’s PRR analysis cannot accurately identify when a vaccine causes adverse events, one of the emails shows. Martha Sharan, a CDC spokeswoman, sent the query to Dr. John Su, who leads the CDC’s VAERS team, and Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, who also works on vaccine safety.

 

Their responses were redacted apart from a comment on NewsGuard. Sharan then wrote that she’d spoken to Gregory.

 

“I spoke to the reporter and explained that CDC does not do PPR analysis. The reporter is not going to pursue this any further!” she wrote, adding later that she meant PRR.

 

That contradicts the operating procedures, which state that the CDC “will perform Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) analysis” on VAERS reports.

 

“We let our published content speak for itself,” Gregory told The Epoch Times in an email when notified that the CDC does actually perform PRRs.

 

‘That’s a New One to Me’

 

In June 2022, the CDC falsely told Children’s Health Defense, a nonprofit, that PRR analysis is “outside of th[e] agency’s purview.” An Associated Press reporter, Angelo Fichera, flagged a Children’s Health Defense article on the statement to the CDC, asking whether the CDC had ever performed the analysis, according to the newly obtained emails.

 

Kristen Nordlund, another CDC spokeswoman, forwarded the query to Sharan. “Martha—thoughts on this one?” she asked.

 

“That’s a new one on me—proportional reporting ratios’—I need to send this one to John,” Sharan responded.

 

Sharan later sent a statement about PRRs to The Associated Press and the Washington Examiner.

 

The Associated Press and NewsGuard never published stories on the topic. After The Epoch Times reported on contradictory statements from the CDC, the Examiner published an article about the developments.

 

Fichera, Sharan, and Su did not respond to requests for comment for this article.

 

The emails were obtained by The Epoch Times and an independent researcher through FOIA requests.

 

https://www.ntd.com/newly-obtained-emails-shed-more-light-on-cdcs-false-vaccine-safety-monitoring-statements_850118.html