>>1766617 (prev)
Not good.
Well, Getty is a major player in the occult/human trafficking ring, so it may be worth the time to dig into the article again.
Either way, thanks Anon. Getty is a major player in all of this.
This has nothing to do with our Getty discussion. WTF anon?
Noice, but the guy at the top is too much anon. Crop the image!
Less is Moar! Oh, but wait!….