Anonymous ID: 0069f5 Oct. 30, 2022, 5:45 a.m. No.17709173   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9174 >>9180

HRC and Elon present two possible interpretations of the story - the only two that will dare be discussed by any 'legitimate' news sources

  1. That the 'attacker' was a crazy Q supporter or

  2. That he was Paul's gay lover

I believe in the third version where the whole thing is a false flag to discredit Q and all conservatives as purveyors of hate speech/extremism etc. If my version is right, then Musk is playing into the hands of the leftists who concocted the false flag. Not a fan of that at all. Musk is a deeply ambiguous character. I lean more towards glowie than nerd-savant-anon.

What say you, frens?

Anonymous ID: 0069f5 Oct. 30, 2022, 6 a.m. No.17709182   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9185

>>17709180

>Your third theory is part and parcel to the first.

I should have said that my (3rd) theory involves Depape being set up as a patsy/Q supporter.

Is it not more than a little strange that Depape was silent online for 15 years until he started posting Q stuff a few weeks ago?

 

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1586435541301460993