Anonymous ID: ccd14a Nov. 19, 2022, 1:27 p.m. No.17792736   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2745 >>2757 >>2768

>>17792689

there is no intention that is necessary except for the granting of rights.

gaming the rights of others, Free Speech being so important, is a tasteless thing to do unless at the end of it he reveals that it was always his intention to restore the rights of those who were censored, banned, and treated as if they were criminals merely for expression that counters the rulerships point of view.

 

Mr Musk, Tear down that wall!

(of censorship)

 

I, for one, am not amused. WE don't get to vote to say if people's rights should be respected. Their rights should be respected!

Anonymous ID: ccd14a Nov. 19, 2022, 1:34 p.m. No.17792765   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>17792689

>>17792689

there is no intention that is necessary except for the granting of rights.

gaming the rights of others, Free Speech being so important, is a tasteless thing to do unless at the end of it he reveals that it was always his intention to restore the rights of those who were censored, banned, and treated as if they were criminals merely for expression that counters the rulership's point of view.

 

Mr Musk, Tear down that wall!

(of censorship)

 

I, for one, am not amused. We don't get to vote to say if people's rights should be respected. Their rights should be respected!

Anonymous ID: ccd14a Nov. 19, 2022, 1:49 p.m. No.17792805   🗄️.is 🔗kun

this would be humorous, this is something Elon could say:

"anyone who voted to take away Mr. Trump's rights will now be suspended from Twitter."

 

followed by 'only kidding, we protect your right to free speech even when it's loathsome points of view that you express.'

Anonymous ID: ccd14a Nov. 19, 2022, 2:13 p.m. No.17792874   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17792868

If Don says it's OK to have the vote, then I'm sure that there is a great teachable-moment in store for all those who dare to vote to ban someone from Twitter.