So, in D3 where Boebert won in Colorado, kike goon Griswold ordered a recount. People said, OK, if there's going to be a recount, it's going to be done properly.
Griswold goons fought back, now it's going to CO supreme court on how the recount should be conducted. The law is that a random group of ballots are selected, and =hand recounted= and compared to the machine.
Can't figure out why Griswold is fighting this tooth and nail. Dumb bitch didn't need to order the recount, since challenger accepted loss. (that's curious too)
https://www.montrosepress.com/only-a-one-vote-change-in-montrose-county-s-cd3-recount-as-requests-to-halt/article_4e78e160-7687-11ed-9d89-8b0a0e13dc8e.html
Montrose country (run by libs) already did there recount with the machines. Causes quite the stir at the Clerk and Recorders office.
Excerpt
"ll counties in CD3 except for San Juan County are rescanning original ballots and, with bipartisan teams of election judges, are re-adjudicating ones that the machines reject. San Juan County is conducting the recount by hand because that is how the original election was conducted there.
The petitioners’ filings say that although they do not want to needlessly delay the recount past the mandated finish date of Dec. 13, the action should be stayed until the state’s high court determines whether testing was conducted as required.
They also seek to halt Griswold from acting on any amended and resubmitted abstract of figures unless and until each canvass board member of each county can certify in writing that the proper prior-to-recount test was conducted, and by whom.
The petition asks for the counties that did not conduct the prior-to-recount test be ordered to ignore their recount results and conduct a new one that performs the testing first. Counties that conducted an unlawful recount, as alleged, should bear the costs of the second recount, the petitioners argue."