mate. you keep posting DIFFERENT VERSIONS of the same clock. this one has the original 2 days post lining under the "34 minute" marker. This post >>17944480 has the origingal 2 days posted lined under the "29 minute" marker. How is there any consistency at all?
yes this is what I remember too. it had nothing to do with a circular flow diagram. maybe Q was referring to the posts being ordered (flowing) chronologically as is the graphic here. to be honest, this type of design would resonate with more anons and at least afaik q has ACTUALLY replied to these type of graphics unlike qclockfags.
ok. using qaggregators qclock right now to cross check. it seems im very close to understanding. Why was post 2644 deemed the 34 minute mark and where are you getting the :29 minute mark if the quoted post (according to qaggaregator) has a :19 minute mark.
the problem i have understanding is that post 2644 is deemed "34 minute mark" yet it was posted on the chans on 12:45 local time respectively (hours change minutes dont). and post 489 was posted 3:10 local time respectively (hour:minute) yet deemed "19 minute mark". Do you see my issue here?
How can I understand it if nobody is willing to explain it? Q has never replied to any of your clocks dude. You aren't special at all. Also your formatting makes me think you're a retarded boomer.
funny how you don't name the post number? im chill, how about tell that anon to quit sperging out at me for asking questions about the clock. our convo goes back 2-3 threads
sorry not :19 minute mark meant to say
>. Why was post 2644 deemed the 34 minute mark and where are you getting the :29 minute mark if the "2 day ahead" post (according to qaggaregator) has a :45 minute mark timestamp?
>the problem i have understanding is that post 2644 is deemed "34 minute mark" yet it was posted on the chans on 12:45 local time respectively (hours change minutes dont). and post 489, the post 2644 2 day ahead was quoting, was posted 3:10 local time respectively (hour:minute) yet deemed "31 minute mark". Do you see my issue here?
What post on a 01/05 was posted on a Friday? the "2 day post" 2644 was posted on a saturday and the quoted post from 2018 was posted on a sunday.
Do you believe in the q clocks like this one? ive been asking an anon who posted it how he reasoned his numbers and deltas from because 10/09 is not 2 days after 01/05. it's just since they keep posting the clocks i see fit an anon should be devils advocate and debate them so lurkers can see we're actually trying to tidy this place up.
Can we make it a plan to get anons to ask about the q clock? Maybe like "Can you post any accurate qclock we've decoded?" i just find it strange an anon itt said q replied to a clock but nobody can tell me which post. I've been following for years and i've never seen him respond to a clock. In fact thats kind of why the whole anticlock thing is around. Also because most of them can't explain themselves.
I mean "can we make it a plan to ask Q in the QA to ask about the q clock"
i can't tell what you're for. are you antiqclock or pro qclock? Im asking questions. Weird how qclockfags get angry when you question them?
Shame on you to assume what my intentions are. Q has referenced "flowing circular diagram" and "clock and graphic" in the original first hundred q drops that;s why I'm asking questions about the clock. How about you sit the fuck down and let the truth work its way out?
That's not a direct clock reply, moron.
Explain what the circular flow diagram Q was referencing, then.He was quoting an anon who mentioned it, so there IS at least an anon thats not Q here who understands that Q is pushing for a circular flowing diagram.
Biggest notable of today IMO is that both Bolsonaro and Trump made references to superheroes.
>Q: Ask Question
>Me: *asks question about the qclock
>(You): NOOOOOO WE DON'T DO THAT HERE STOP NEWFAG.
Qclockfags can't take criticism.
Actual notable.
Excuse me? What's a PF and what's your point? I'm asking what the circular flowing diagram in post 1114 is. Questions are allowed here.
How come none of them can explain then?
no is it an acronym for something?
your gif is titled a bunch of random letters.
Does anyone have the bread?
How come theres loads of blogs online explaining q posts post by post but theres nothing on the q clock even on bitchute/odysee.
I post wherever the damn well I please. I've been following Q on and off (internet breaks) since 2018/Epsteins arrest saga. I will ask what the qclock is and anons will respond.
You called?
did you save that >>13635261 post in a notepad or something? I know what deltas are (though i'd like all those archived deltas you mentioned) can you post an example of a q clock you yourself personally think is legit?
not scared. on the contrary i've been following q on qalerts for years but never followed the qclock so thats why im asking. Why shut down an anon for asking questions? This isn't your boat.
Trump and Bolsonaro mention superheroes the same day
Nigger I want to understand that's why I have 29 fucking posts (and probably over 100 the past breads) asking an anon to explain his q clock. he fucking left in the middle of it. see >>17945223
>The clocks as well as clockfags are complicated and you want simple answers.
I don't expect a one sentence answer. I just expect an anon to follow along a q clock with me but they never do. They always leave when the criticisms get deep. See >>17945144
I'll bless anons with my wallpaper thanks for the inspiration/reminder
This is called circling the argument. I know what project looking glass. I know about the galactic federation. The problem is anons can't defend specific mapped out qclocks without resorting to "newfag" also, there's literally dozens of alternate versions of them. The biggest flaw they have is they're not posted with the timezone POV the designer is in so days can be off and therefore they throw off an entire ring and therefore the rest of the outer layers ruining the entire diagram.
meant to reply to you >>17945693 see >>17945713
Anons say not all qclocks are legit. So then I challenge you to post a qclock that is so we can talk it over.
I don't give a shit what retards think. What part about question everything do you not understand? I will question whatever I want and you will sit back and watch faggot.
Based baker btfoing non-canon qclockfags.
Just what q needs. A bunch of morons spamming schizophrenic qclocks unwilling to explain themselves beyond time travel. If you can't dissect the matter at hand, you don't know what the fuck you're doing at all.
>Immediately resorts to talking about homosexual acts
The absolute state of the qclockfag when pressed.
The problem is in the phrasing "Clock and graphic" meaning they are DIFFERENT. What Q is referring to are graphics that have markers in them (clock) like pic rel
this is a real clock (marker/delta) and graphic
Do you have any other possible explanation as to why Q is referring to "clock" and "graphic" separately as "clock and graphic" then? Any explanation why he has never replied or reposted any of them? I do. It's because you
>Some people explain their view of the plan differently
That's the problem you're not getting. For 3-5 breads straight (longer) they cannot explain themselves at all.