>>17948813
>After all these years of hearing about QAnon, I’m still not sure why anyone cares about it. It has zero effect on mainstream politics,
it was perfect.
Played the fake news like a fiddle
4881
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26 ID: f457dc
8kun/qresearch: 11118631
Q Clock [ Min: 25 | :25/:55 Mir: 25 | 180 Mir: 55 | :35/:05 Mir: 45 ]
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q