Hello Anons,
I find this headline amusing: "Adam Schiff: 'Trump Violated Multiple Criminal Laws'" especially after reading the exchange with Tapper.
Lets take it a line at a time shall we…
Tapper asks first question and Schiff responds that "evidence is there that Donald Trump committed criminal offenses".
Sound familiar?
How often did Schiff say this about Russia, Russia, Russia but never showed any conclusive evidence?
Now comes the scam for those of use who know how the left deceives…
Schiff continues to discuss "pressure on state officials to find votes", however, Trump is not identified in this statement.
To whom is Shifty Schiff referring?
Those listening immediately consider that the prior sentence was about Trump so this statement must also be about Trump.
That is the listeners first mistake.
Schiff is speaking about Bidan and friends. By stating a truth but without identifying to whom the truth applies, Adam can sleep at night. So what if the listener assumed Adam was speaking about Trump. This cannot be proven in a court of law as the statement did not specifically identify the subject of the accusation. The subject is assumed.
Schiff's last statement in this post solidifies in this anon's mind that deception is at play.
Schiff states "I will say I think the president has violated multiple criminal laws".
We know damn well Trump has not but Bidan surely has. Shifty Schiff only identifies the "president", not Trump specifically. Again, he speaks a truth about Biden - the president - so his conscience is clear but the listener assumes that Trump is the focus of the subject matter being discussed.
See how this works?
Are you getting it yet?