Lawfag here with a big I TOLD YOU SO = shill replies expected

Which is kari lakes POS complaint and crappy PR stunt lawfags

See my post from last week below and compare to judge ruling today at

https://drive.google.com/file/d/10V4383mSMQAARGJwkU6j8iMUx8OL6cn7/view

OH no you corrupt Hebrew lawfag she WON muhnewsheadlines all says so – LOOK AGAIN

The judge DISMISSED EIGHT OF TEN COUNTS IN THE COMPLAINT

YES I SAY EIGHT OF TEN DID NOT PASS MOTION TO DISIMISS and for the very reasons lawfag posted

What a clusterfuk

The two left will no doubt be TOSSED next week – bet on it and oh BTWit wont take long either – as the court wrote:

The Court originally allocated two days for the trial of this election challenge. That

allocation of time was based on the original nine counts of the Petition being heard. The ruling on the Motions To Dismiss has reduced the number of remaining counts substantially. Therefore, the original time estimate should be more than adequate to accommodate a full hearing on the merits.

Last week post

Lawfag here with a report on the kari lake legal complaint just filed

ok the heading is fine – its called “Statement of Election Contest under ARS 16-672”

So lets looks at that AZ Code (law) Section it says:

A. Any elector of the state may contest the election of any person declared elected to a state office… upon any of the following grounds:

1. For misconduct on the part of election boards or any members thereof in any of the counties of the state, or on the part of any officer making or participating in a canvass for a state election.

(2 NA)

1. That the person… has given.., a bribe or reward, or… committed any other offense against the elective franchise.

2. On account of illegal votes.

3. That by reason of erroneous count of votes the person… did not in fact receive the highest number of votes…

OK so when lawfag starts a lawsuit based on a specific Code like this what is the first thing he/she/it does? (kek) RECITE THE ELEMENTS OF THE CODE

What is the second thing he does? (kek) RECITE (ALLEGE) THE FACTS THAT SUPPORT EACH ELEMENT OF THE CODE

This is “Pleading 101” basics anons, So why do I mention it? Because this is NOT WTF her complaint does. Not even close. The stupid thing reads like a political opinion piece or a rally speech – read for yourself – as a piece of legal work to get a legal win it is AWFUL - and this is not the first time lawfag been seent this shit- no all of TRUMPS lawsuits were the same style – and remember what happened to all of them? THROWN OUT for one reason or another.

Para 13 –we got whistleblowers!!!!!!!!!! OMG what news what suspense!!! NOT! You don’t allege that in a complaint – you allege WHAT RELEVANT FACTS you believe you can prove…

Para 14 – OK here one decent sentence – “…permitted counting of ballots that did not meet signature requirements…” OK stop stop there – the rest is evidence for trial and is put in for PR nonsense – but in that it fails it does nothing to support the litigation – blah blah blah yada yada – why?

I do not know who or WTF is going on here but I could write a better complaint in an hour of work. Its really just a PR document and that pisses me off – this movie is not credible anons and sorry for the rant – the system os faggot

Links to complaint and Arizona Code

https://www.scribd.com/document/613430170/Election-Contest-Kari-Lake#from_embed

https://www.azleg.gov/ars/16/00672.htm

>>17985322

u obviously know zero about legal complaints

read the entire post and the sauce links then the judge opinion link

if you can think for yourself u will see i was 100% correct

then get bak to me

>>17985343

elias is the one shitposting lawfag

or somone with his same ethics

>>17985348

law grew up and practiced in seattle home of perkins coie

in my time they were the best firm in town

paul coie was a legend

not any moar

>>17985365

im saying the complaint was a PR document more than a legal one

that was a knowing decision by someone unless kari is clueless how to manage lawyers and they are in fact incompetent

i would guess both are part of the problem

the main problem is its a political document

>>17985366

in my post i stated there are legal allegations sprinkled in

just enuf to keep those two

important fact - on a motion to dismiss the judge must assume all facts alleged are true and even any favorable "inference" from those facts

if that makes a case then those counts go ahead

they failed 8 of 10 on that standard

that is not good lawyering

>>17985368

sorry i was reply to marc elias post

he was with perkins which are now libprog corrupt POS

they are NOT the lake lawyers tho

>>17985371

i was until i retired

i rarely lost

not because i was perfect

because i litigated winners and settled losers and that is best for clients

did u read her complaint?

>>17985380

lawfag here

it is unfortunate

however do not despair

if she has proof of two counts in enuf to get the election overturned

>>17985382

dont wait

read the posts

>>17985389

so if u think that is proper complaint go bak and reread civil rule 8

here it is for bystanderanons who can all understand plain simple rule

Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading.

(a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain:

(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support;

(2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and

(3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.

>>17985397

axe a question i shall reply

>>17985403

>a short and plain statement

this is known as fact based pleading

it is NOT for arguments policy positions or news releases- in fact most EVIDENCE does not belong in a complaint picrel

>>17985414

yes 100% true believer

i believe in fact this is the reason for the long time needed for the plan to come about

real americans love and respect the constitution and do not want to take up arms againts other amercans - even corrupt shitheads

this is a big disadvantage agsint cheaters and liars BUT if we give that up we lost even if we beat them

we need to go back to the constitution and a smaller accountable govt

the exact thing our founders said

and we can still do it once enuf normies wake up

that is the main goal of the plan IMO

>>17985423

i posted my case

u posted nothing

>>17985425

lawfag hopes to military tribunals

its the only way

i dont care about any one player

once we take control that is worse than death for them

>>17985430

well that complaint was 60 pages and the judge found a few nuggets he did a good job

lakes lawyer shud have done

i hope she has the goods

>>17985442

well u still have not stated any rebutall of any point i made but i will answer your questions

>How many cases have you litigated, i.e. took to court?

too many to recall

>How many times did you bring up moar counts on your case, know that the opposing side would file motions against where you knew that you were strong on most of them, in the middle on others, and weak on the rest to force your opponent to focus on your weaker claims?

very occasionally i plead weak/throwaway counts but not often and they looked nothing like the lake rants they called a complaint

its not really a winning strategy

i like to maintain cerdibility with the judge

once i had a rep for honest and efficient with judges and lawyers it made my life a lot easier and better for clients

much better

>>17985449

no the ANTI lawfag are the slide

like they are EVERY time i post

every

fucking

time

so says lawfag

>>17985465

lawfag here

yes and no

all the basics are still there

just need to CLEAN HOUSE

to do that normies need to see wut anons see

not yet apparently

once it gets on muhtv THEN

2 more weeks

kek

>>17985499

lawfag says lawfags that end up in congress are no better that other political science faggots and other with liberal arts edumacation

none of knows shit except how to lie and advance themselves

and trust me i know u (almost) never advance in this system if u are honest -

>>17985506

wut u want to know fren?

>>17985509

next u will complaint that lawfag has 22 posts

>>17985514

u said lawfag gone but he here defending every shill atak

>>17985516

see notables faggot

>>17985534

i bet IRL you work as a chat based customer service rep

i say that because you repeat the same wrong answer over and over………..

>>17985537

sorry anon

takes extra posts to weed out the shills

they come out every time lawfag posts

plus often the issues are complex and anons have questions

>>17985546

so u are not anon then

u have to go bak

>>17985550

>And the lawfag has backup, because they always work in teams, anons

THINK MIRROR anons

its the shills who have teams not lawfag

and they always glow like this one

>>17985551

>and they always glow like this one

and this one

exposes themselves with muhjoo comment

still have internet in ukraine? must be in kiev

>>17985555

if that were true u wud post the famous

"what did u just say about me…." rant

as it is u just a namefag and u even proud of it

what a glow

>>17985568

>>17985571

>==Go eat a bag of foreskins, kiddo.

oh u ruined it and exposed urself as a glowy shitposter

try harder or go away