Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 19, 2022, 11:59 p.m. No.17985720   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5829 >>6201 >>6300 >>6360 >>6402

All Pb

>>17985627

>>17985633

>>17985650

>>17985661

>>17985674

 

When all is said and done, I sure hope there are volumes of books like a full set, that are play by play, tweet by tweet, truth by truth, news articles, etc., that walk everyone through how it all went down, the Q team real history, and all the hidden COMMs, all laid bare, so all can go back in time and understand all the

habbenings

as they occurred.

So much we probably missed.

I sure hope Q team has many historians that are also autistic

writing it all down hour by hour.

The set of books will be like old school encyclopedia sets.

I will buy the complete set and read every last word page by page.

As an anon, i can assure you these are things to look forward to.

 

The future proves past

is stuff to long for,

in my opinion.

All the Q stuff has captured my mind and heart.

So glad I have been around since it began.

Seeing it unfold currently is getting really good.

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 12:09 a.m. No.17985743   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5771

>>17985697

 

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 88957f No.613229 📁

Mar 10 2018 13:04:36 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 436341 No.613193 📁

Mar 10 2018 13:02:22 (EST)

C8F91EAD-51C7-47FA-96C5-C….jpeg⬇

 

>>613129

What about Awan.

Is Israel involved?

>>613193

We are saving Israel for last.

Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.

Q

 

They think they are immune and hidden.

>>17985696

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 2:01 a.m. No.17985952   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5955 >>5958 >>5961 >>5964 >>6004 >>6006 >>6014 >>6015 >>6110 >>6152 >>6196 >>6246 >>6283

Finally a bit of traftion regarding Brunson SCOTUS:

 

https://www.publicnow.com/view/3E3844F9BA83F1CEC2C3E5B47731B3DC47A5DC21?1671379168

 

MIKE HUCKABEE

12/18/2022 | News release | Distributed by Public on 12/18/2022 08:41

 

Sunday Standard: December 18

BY MIKE HUCKABEE

DECEMBER18, 2022

|

Here are the top stories from this week that I think you will want to read.

 

If you prefer to read my newsletter online, go here:

 

And after you read my Sunday Standard, please leave me a comment.

 

Sincerely,

 

Mike Huckabee

 

SIT DOWN; I GUARANTEE THIS SUPREME COURT STORY IS REAL

 

This story was originally published on December 16.

 

The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably - PLEASEconsider this the longest of long shots - overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the resultsand leave them ineligible to run for office ever again, even for town dogcatcher.

 

The case has been added to the docket for, appropriately, January 6, 2023.

 

There's essentially no media attention being given to this case; most news outlets find it much too hot to touch. But the heat doesn't faze us; we keep a pair of oven mitts close by for times like this.

As Joshua Philipp reportedin a podcast for EPOCH TV, the case Brunson v. Alma Adams, et. al., alleges that members of Congress who voted against the proposed 10-day audit of the 2020 elections and certifying those results - with no investigation after being "properly warned" of a credible threat from enemies of the Constitution - were violating their oath of office to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic."It says that "this action unilaterally violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and perhaps the rights of every person living, and all courts of law."

 

cont:

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 2:02 a.m. No.17985955   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5958 >>5961 >>5962 >>5964 >>6004 >>6006 >>6014 >>6015 >>6110 >>6196 >>6283

>>17985952

cont: SIT DOWN; I GUARANTEE THIS SUPREME COURT STORY IS REAL https://www.publicnow.com/view/3E3844F9BA83F1CEC2C3E5B47731B3DC47A5DC21?1671379168

 

If SCOTUS ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the remedy would conceivably involve removing the sitting President and Vice President and all those representatives and empower the Court to authorize the swearing-in of the rightful President and Vice President.Not kidding; that's the remedy the plaintiffs are asking for.

 

The Brunson brothers are an interesting group – literally a band of brothers, asthey play in a trumpet band. Here they are, withtheir summary of the suit, which was reportedly written by just themselves, without legal counsel (!).

 

https://ralandbrunson.com

 

Note: Philipp's report was made before SCOTUS agreed to hear the case, and he said then he would be "very surprised" if they did. So I guess he's very surprised right now. Actually, I am, too, considering the way the Court refused to look into those very allegations in the weeks after the election, when they were brought by President Trump. (Of course, now we know much more about the lengths to which Trump's enemies went to interfere with the outcome. Maybe enough Justices are feeling some guilt right now about calling the issue "moot.")

 

Philipp also pointed out that this segment of his show, "Crossroads," would not be allowed on YouTube. (Good news, though: he can now post the link on Twitter!)We'll include the EPOCH TV link here…

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-weighs-on-brunson-v-alma-case-that-could-overturn-2020-election_4907648.html

 

The argument in this case is that by not looking into serious allegations of election fraud, those who voted to confirm the results of the 2020 election broke their oath of office and are ineligible to run for any elected office again. To give you an idea of the scope of the potential fallout, Kamala Harris is in that group, and so is Mike Pence.

 

This started as two separate lawsuits brought by four brothers in Utah, but only one of them is advancing to the Supreme Court. To get it there, the brothers bypassed the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, where it was stalled, by saying in a cover letter that this suit was a matter of national security. The Court was apparently so interested in this case that they received a personal call from the Court clerk asking how soon they could get their documents together. The brothers got it all to them in one week.

 

The suit names President Biden, VP Harris, former VP Pence, and 385 members of Congress, and, no, that is not a typo. Those are all the members who voted against a proposition for them to investigate claims that "enemies of the Constitution rigged the 2020 election." So, this case is NOT about whether or not election fraud occurred. It's about whether or not these people violated their oath by failing to investigate credible allegations of election rigging by enemies of the Constitution – allegations that had been made by over a hundred of their own colleagues.

 

In their words: "Is this about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation, thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES." The suit says this violation is an act of treason and fraud. "A successfully rigged election has the same effect as an act of war: to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law."

 

"When the allegations of a rigged election came forward, the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office."

 

According to Philipp, a finding for the plaintiffs would "also restore Trump to office because he would have been the legitimate candidate." We're not yet sure how that part of the argument works but are researching. Even if a majority of the Justices found merit in this case, would they be willing to do something this huge? They would be keeping in mind the potential consequences and, of course, possible effects on the balance of power. If this happened, it would be the wildest things ever to happen within our government — a purge, really, which, I have to admit, sounds pretty great with the state our country is currently in. But you know the saying, if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

 

Here are some thoughts on the case from Timothy Canova, a professor of constitutional law at the Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/tim-canova-supreme-court-considers-case-seeking-overturn-2020-presidential-election/

Tim Canova: Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 2:08 a.m. No.17985961   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5964 >>5968 >>5969 >>6004 >>6006 >>6014 >>6015 >>6110 >>6196 >>6283

>>17985958

>>17985955

>>17985952

 

link to website article

and comments section:

 

https://www.mikehuckabee.com/latest-news?id=79E58DC1-A12E-43AB-9D66-58BE00C0FE3C

 

By Mike Huckabee

December 16, 2022 |

 

The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably - PLEASE consider this the longest of long shots - overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again, even for town dogcatcher.

 

The case has been added to the docket for, appropriately, January 6, 2023.

 

There’s essentially no media attention being given to this case; most news outlets find it much too hot to touch. But the heat doesn’t faze us; we keep a pair of oven mitts close by for times like this.

 

cont:

https://www.mikehuckabee.com/latest-news?id=79E58DC1-A12E-43AB-9D66-58BE00C0FE3C

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 2:09 a.m. No.17985964   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6004 >>6006 >>6014 >>6015 >>6110 >>6196 >>6283

>>17985961

>>17985958

>>17985955

>>17985952

 

Comments 1-10 of 11

 

Dave Carter

12/19/2022 03:33 PM

I think there are many voters, probably over 50% that will be watching this very closely in hope that the Supreme Court has the guts and ability to overturn the 2020 election which I along with many of my contacts believe was stolen. The evidence is overwhelming if they look at everything I have seen over the last 2 years. I am also pleased that the Law Suite is coming from a fellow Utahn.

We should all be praying for this to proceed. If you think the Democrats have been doing evil things up to now, wait until this goes to the Supreme Court and watch what they do then to stop it.

 

surlycurmudgen

12/19/2022 12:13 PM

There is a legal procedure for submitting support for a case before a judge. This can be from anyone or any group. WE THE PEOPLE perhaps should submit our support of the Bruin case to the supreme court using that legal procedure. It does not need to be universal; it could be ten if us from here in TN and a couple hundred from another state. It could be ONE citizen from anywhere!

Someone please step up and tell us the term for that procedure.

 

surlycurmudgen

12/19/2022 11:49 AM

There is a legal procedure for submitting support for a case before a judge. This can be from anyone or any group. WE THE PEOPLE perhaps should submit our support of the Bruin case to the supreme court using that legal procedure. It does not need to be universal; it could be ten if us from here in TN and a couple hundred from another state. It could be ONE citizen from anywhere!

Someone please step up and tell us the term for that procedure.

 

surlycurmudgen

12/19/2022 11:27 AM

I pray that justice will be visited upon all the malefactors.

 

Catherine Riley

12/18/2022 06:01 PM

Maybe if we sent up enough prayers and if God's people would repent of there sin and ask for forgivenes…..who knows what God might do

 

valerie elizabeth blount

12/18/2022 01:14 PM

For the life of me can not fathom why SCOTUS did not take a good look at this when it all happened. CLEARLY there were cases where the votes were not legitimately certified. I respect Pence but couldn't believe he so easily respected what the legislators handed him. Mystifying to me. Please…let SCOTUS honestly and decently scrub the slate clean and give us some honest results..PLEASE!!!!

 

Robert Sullivan

12/18/2022 12:03 PM

Amen, I say to you Amen!!!

 

Rhonda 3

12/18/2022 02:27 AM

This is what the American people have been praying for. Nothing is impossible with Gods help may the Lord bless these brothers and restore our constitution to what it should be and pruge these 385 members from congress and pence also who just came on your show Not to be polite about President Trump (which he criticized and bad mouthed about the elections and January 6th) but to try and sell his new book which I will not buy and to see his ratings on becoming president and No I would not vote for pence

 

val griffith

12/17/2022 03:19 PM

All we ever asked was a complete and honest investigation

 

Frances G Schmidt

12/17/2022 02:29 PM

Governor Huckabee, this would be an answer to prayer! A reminder that the Lord is working; “Lean not on your own understanding.”

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 2:19 a.m. No.17985980   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5982 >>5991 >>6115

>>17985966

>>17985966

 

i have morgellons

i took it daily for a month.

then every three days

now twice a week

forever

 

just like you worm your pets

 

panacur

and

albendazole ( generic animal Valbazen)

 

i do either or both every couple of days

no problems or weird habbenings at all

getting better

 

start with a lot, then slow down and maintain

 

a nickel size squirt under tonge for a minute

then with my spit I hold head back and gargle it in throat for about 15-20 seconds

to get in the blood faster

and right near lymph nodes

 

then I swallow it

then chase with something tasty

to get rid of mouth taste

 

easy

 

and daily

 

then weekly

 

then a big squirt each month

forever.

 

again

 

we worm our pets

our great grand parents knew to worm family and enemas

 

they knew

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 2:26 a.m. No.17985991   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17985982

always shake the

valbazen

 

i use a plastic tube dropper or I just shake and chug a bit from the container

I am the only one using it

and I aslo just squeeze direct from the tube under tongue

 

the dosage is by your weight

 

i really just realized the small amount and just eyeball it

you do you though

 

I use both on my cats as well in SMALL amounts

one cat got soooo much better.

fat round firm belly gone

 

gave them all about a teaspoon in a syringe down their throats

then again 2 weeks later.

 

now just once every two months

 

 

>>17985966

>>17985980

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 2:34 a.m. No.17986004   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6014 >>6015 >>6027 >>6110 >>6196 >>6283

>>17985952

>>17985955

>>17985958

>>17985961

>>17985964

>The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably - PLEASEconsider this the longest of long shots - overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results

>and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again,

>even for town dogcatcher.

 

>The case has been added to the docket for, appropriately, January 6, 2023.

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 2:35 a.m. No.17986006   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6246

 

>>17985952

>>17985955

>>17985958

>>17985961

>>17985964

>The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably - PLEASEconsider this the longest of long shots - overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results

>and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again,

>even for town dogcatcher.

 

>The case has been added to the docket for, appropriately, January 6, 2023.

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 2:40 a.m. No.17986014   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6027 >>6110 >>6196 >>6283

>>17985952

>>17985955

>>17985958

>>17985961

>>17985962

>>17985964

>>17986004

 

video

https://youtu.be/jyN_k1a86n0

 

Joshua Phillip with Epoch Times on Brunson

Exposing The Oath Breakers

1 subscriber

111 views Dec 14, 2022

Common Law upheld through Constitutional Law

 

 

>Note: Philipp's report was made before SCOTUS agreed to hear the case, and he said then he would be "very surprised" if they did. So I guess he's very surprised right now. Actually, I am, too, considering the way the Court refused to look into those very allegations in the weeks after the election, when they were brought by President Trump. (Of course, now we know much more about the lengths to which Trump's enemies went to interfere with the outcome. Maybe enough Justices are feeling some guilt right now about calling the issue "moot.")

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 2:41 a.m. No.17986015   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6027 >>6231 >>6237 >>6246

>>17985952

>>17985955

>>17985958

>>17985961

>>17985962

>>17985964

>>17986004

 

video

https://youtu.be/jyN_k1a86n0

 

Joshua Phillip with Epoch Times on Brunson

Exposing The Oath Breakers

1 subscriber

111 views Dec 14, 2022

Common Law upheld through Constitutional Law

 

 

>Note: Philipp's report was made before SCOTUS agreed to hear the case, and he said then he would be "very surprised" if they did. So I guess he's very surprised right now.

 

>Actually, I am, too, considering the way the Court refused to look into those very allegations in the weeks after the election, when they were brought by President Trump. (Of course, now we know much more about the lengths to which Trump's enemies went to interfere with the outcome. Maybe enough Justices are feeling some guilt right now about calling the issue "moot.")

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 4:42 a.m. No.17986231   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6283

>>17986015

 

The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen, merely that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military.

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 4:45 a.m. No.17986237   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6249 >>6283 >>6355

 

>>17986015

 

The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen,

 

merely that a large majority of Congress,

 

by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security,

 

violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military.

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 4:47 a.m. No.17986246   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6283

>>17986015

>>17985952

>>17986006

 

 

 

>>17986015

 

The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen,

 

merely that a large majority of Congress,

 

by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security,

 

violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military.

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 4:58 a.m. No.17986267   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6269 >>6300 >>6360 >>6402

>>17986124

 

https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread606838/pg1

 

Jackie Kennedy was MK Ultra Victim, aka Manchurian Candidate; Unconsciously Shot JFK in the Throat

 

more

posted on Aug, 28 2010 @ 03:00 PMlink

-WARNING!-

 

The information and links in this thread are graphic and extremely disturbing.

 

Contrary to common assertions, Jackie did not cradle JFK's head after he was shot. You can watch the Zapruder film and see for yourself. She pushes him by the top of the head off of her as he collapses towards her, and then immediately leaves her dead husband to get something off of the trunk of the vehicle. Don't take my word for it, watch it yourself and try to find where she "cradles" her husband. It does NOT occur. She would later admit to not remembering this event herself, which would be typical of a repressed traumatic memory, or also of having already been unconscious for all intents and purposes before her husband was even shot.

 

She turns to JFK in the seconds before the shooting, staring at him, and he stares at her. She is filmed raising her hand in the air with an object pointing straight up in the air:

 

 

 

She then lowers her hand and arm below JFK's head and immediately afterward JFK is shot and a trajectory can seen moving straight up into the air, not coming from the grassy knoll, and there is also a lingering puff of smoke right next to his head indicating a firearm discharge.

 

Neither John nor Jackie Kennedy are smoking a cigarette. The smoke has been caused by some explosive reaction, such as the detonation of a firearm cartridge. Such smoke remains where the gun is; it does not travel with the bullet. The fact that this smoke appears in the sequence at the same time as the fatal injury, and that it emanates from the left-hand-side of JFK's head, where Jackie Kennedy has positioned herself, means that President Kennedy was killed by his wife.

 

www.realityreviewed.com…

 

The grassy knoll was disinformation and manipulation of the direction in which the visible trajectory was actually moving. It looks as if a bullet may have come from the grassy area, but really this is the trajectory moving away from his head and up into the air, from being shot in the throat with the gun pointed upwards.

 

t was at least a second and possibly also a third independent gunshot that struck JFK in the back and injured the governor.

 

Jackie also worked for the CIA according to at least one of her biographies, from the imdb:

 

Jackie attended boarding schools and then Vassar. After two years, though, she got tired of schools and spent her junior year studying at the Sorbonne in Paris. When she got back to the US she did not want to go back to Vassar, so she enrolled in George Washington University in Washington, DC, graduating in 1951. She took a job at the CIA and in January of 1952 went to work at a Washington newspaper as a photographer. During an assignment, she met U.S. Senator John F. Kennedy, who was 13 years her senior. They were married on September 12, 1953.

 

www.imdb.com…

 

 

If you're not the kind of person that only came to this thread in the first place to bash the idea, then help yourself to these websites that offer you plenty more information:

 

www.realityreviewed.com…

 

jackiekilledjfk.webs.com…

 

jackiekilledjfk.wordpress.com…

 

loveforlife.com.au…

 

Most of all just watch the Zapruder film with this theory in mind.

 

Her demeanor as she turns and stares at her husband is disturbing in itself. According to this theory everyone else in the car would have had to have been "in on it" and one of them would have triggered the Manchurian state by saying something to Jackie to send her into hypnosis. If you are unfamiliar with MK Ultra or the "Manchurian candidate" you will want to look that up as well.

 

She turns to him, he is shot, she then pushes him by his bloody head off and away from her and reaches back to collect something off the trunk.

Anonymous ID: 34433f Dec. 20, 2022, 4:58 a.m. No.17986269   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6300 >>6360 >>6402

>>17986267

>>17986124

 

 

Here's another ATS thread related to this that I found interesting:

 

www.abovetopsecret.com…

 

Also worth mentioning is two men standing beside the road as the car went past, taking pictures, who didn't react to JFK's shooting and seemed to go on taking pictures unconcerned:

 

 

Notice, for instance, a couple of similarly-dressed men, marked 'A' and 'B' (with an equipment bag, marked 'C'), who are almost certainly CIA operatives. President Kennedy is shot in the head right before their eyes, but they do not even flinch, because they are there to document the event, just as the Dancing Israelis were there in New York City to document the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers at the World Trade Centre (as discussed elsewhere on this web site).

 

https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread606838/pg1

 

 

https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread606838/pg1

 

ackie O killed JFK!

page: 1

12<< 2 3 4 >>

log in

join

share:

Kilgour

 

posted on Nov, 2 2007 @ 08:40 PMlink

Hello

I got talking to an old American guy tonight in an old London Pub.

He was a normal,likeable chap who seemed very honest and proud of his work,he didnt seem like a lier and was quite humble and quiet as we chatted.

He claimed he worked for the CIA from 1960 to 69 and as the night went on I brought up the 911 issue.I'de say he was about 80ish.

He was silent and almost sheepish as I brought up inconsistencies in the official story,so I changed the conversation about what he was doing in London and advice on decent restaurants.

He quickly changed the subject to the JFK assasination and stated Jackie shot him with a small weapon that was hidden up her sleeve.

He said she was a MKultra victim and the best way to take him out "was in full view to dazzle the spectators,in plain view"!!!! WTF!

He said it was captured in the Zapruder film and was amazed it still hasnt been spotted.

It was a kinda weird conversation,he wasnt drunk as he was drinking pints of water!

Then he left(with a full pint,of water!)quickly and silently without even a bye.

Im still kinda spooked!

What freaks me out mostly as he was smoking a really fat cigar and the people behind the bar didnt even bat an eyelid,,,,I tried to have a cigarette with him but was promptly told to go to the garden! Amost like he owned the place,or was invisible to the new smoking laws!

Creepy.

 

Vanitas

 

posted on Jun, 28 2008 @ 06:14 PMlink

reply to post by Kilgour

 

 

I would submit that all the photo evidence irrefutably exonerates Jacqueline.

 

But I must admit, at this point I am quite willing to be entertained by anything new, no matter how outlandish…

(I am not referring to your post but to the man's assertions, naturally.)