>>179926

>Eyes wide shut on the Balenciaga scandal

https://www.rt.com/news/568180-balenciaga-advert-teddy-bear/

>"Like with the Epstein-Maxwell case, all the elements are in place for the concerned public to loudly denounce child abuse by powerful people."

Argument: "Maxwell is not a big enough name to trigger a mass awakening." [example]

Counter-argument: Do not make statements based on assumption of 'worth' and/or 'value'. Do not think 'today' but rather 'after' today.

ONE LEADS TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER TO ANOTHER.

ONE LEADS TO MANY.

Crimes against children = common denominator [no matter political affiliation][mass pop awakening].

Have faith in Humanity.

Q

Crimes against children unite all humanity [cross party lines]?

Difficult truths.

Q

Do you sense the awakening, Anons?

>>17992742

>>17992651

>>17992711

>oh really? people are silent about a sex scandal. luckily no one here would be silent about stuff like that right? because we apply scrutiny to everyone equally. . .right?

Absolutely, Anon. Time after time /qresearch has been flooded with hopium and a hero du jour only to be crushed and become embittered towards a long chain of questionable charlatans, LARPers, Internet sages, government employees at every level, and even, at times, the United States Military. Trust anons on this. Everyone gets the scrutiny.

>>17992752

>old fags mostly are gone

Not gone, but old fags keep their heads down sometimes. It's how they got to be old fags. Some oldfags remember what it was like to read Drop #133 in real time and what it required us to think about. That's why we sense the awakening in others, I suppose.