>That only matters if the DOJ tries to arrest
Arrest him? Fukk around and find out.
I TRIPLE double-dog dare them.
To be clear, there is no consensus within the actual U.S. Military leadership to support this proxy war in Ukraine. Not unlike Elon Musk's latest, most successful bot-trap, any Deep State traitor within the Military will be forced to publicly throw-in with disgraced former General David Betrayeus and his fellow traitors in Congress.
Never before has Congress ever committed so much of the Republic's treasure (albeit with unsecured fiat paper currency) and arsenal without complete buy-in reflected by the enthusiastic public support of the U.S. Military leadership.
Syria and Afghanistan are but prequels of the imminent loss of Deep State control of Ukraine.
The fully partisan and secretive nature of the J6 Committee will be but moar indicia of the Committee's unlawfullness, unconstitutionality and treason when its members are eventually brought to trial.
>Olbermann lashed out at Musk
Olbermann has to be the most "frothing at the mouth" rabid of all the treasonous dogs.
THIS.
Yup. While the U.S. Military was carefully observing the Executive Branch (FIB/DoJ) and Judicial Branch (the Federal Judiciary, including Chief Justice Robert's unprecedented bullying of the other SCOTUS members into voting not to accept the Texas lawsuit (challenging election results in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin) on the ludicrous proposition that Texas somehow "had no standing" to bring a lawsuit alleging fraud by the four Swing States.*
….while the U.S. Military was carefully observing the above two Branches deliberately violate their sworn oaths to support and defend the Constitution and to preserve the Republic, it had a front row seat to the greatest act of treason by the Dem-RINO conspiracy in Congress to plan and carry out a false flag "insurrection" at the Capitol with the objective of preventing ANY AND ALL of the Constitutionally-required substantive debate on the certification of the EC votes.
Accordingly, as the U.S. Military sat and watched all other CIVIL remedies be thoroughly EXHAUSTED under the Constitution, it had no recourse but to act on its own in order to Preserve the Republic.
*The key to understanding why the argument of "standing" finally adopted in its decision was inherently unconstitutional, just ask the question
if any or all of the other states were prohibited from bringing a lawsuit before SCOTUS sounding in fraud against another state(s) whose clear and obviously election fraud was determinative as to the outcome of a Presidential Election, where else could, arguably, the 49 other states go in trying to rectify the insult of a stolen presidential election?
Jurisdiction of the Texas, et al, lawsuit fell to the U.S. Supreme Court and no where else. A majority of SCOTUS was about to so vote before Roberts went on his infamous screaming tirade, on the recorded zoom call, that "the Country would be iin flames" if they took the case.