>>18017653

bystanders film was confiscated;

as on 9/11

>>18017687 lb

>>18017425 lb

they all knew it was coming and got down on the floor,

Including LBJ in a car following behind.

>>18017549

no , it just looks like that because the film was altered.

They couldn't show what really happened.

It's smudged.

>>18017541

yes

>>18017655

prove it, if you think so.

Occam's razor, Needlessly multiplying causes.

Easiest answer is most likely.

SIX JFK SHOOTERS, INCLUDING THREE TIED TO CIA, NAMED

https://jameshfetzer.org/2013/12/six-jfk-shooters-including-three-tied-to-cia-named/

There may have been more? but if you think so, show your work.

>>18017928 lb

garbage in / garbage out

they altered the film

so destroyed-ish the evidence.

Yet the fact it was altered proves intent.

Film frames are used to mislead.

so "exploding head"

unless you've studied how it's been altered, you might think that's a real photo?

>>18017480

"Storm drain" is the new "Flat Earth" Must be a lot of videos and fake sites out on it?

"Storm Drain" ? is there evidence? Or is it subjective?

>>18017486

this, but supposedly 6.

at least one missed the shot?

maybe more missed.

That's why they did redundancy?

See how the shot was impossible for a half-assed marksman, as Oswald was rated?

>>18017425 lb

>>18018123

If you think you're not smart or maybe you really aren't smart, then you rely upon authority to tell you.

So if you were one who could figure it out, it's just God's gift to you that you could.

And maybe the free time to study what doctors and other people are saying?

>>18018544

>>18017687 lb

will try to find matching frames from the LIFE first publication of the Zap. still shots.

>>18018544

all are lb but the op mention

>>18018562

no, you're the one who needs boosted.

>>18018561

maybe they claim it was with a hand gun? Maybe he used an umbrella gun

kek

what would be the trajectory?

would the side of the car get in your way

how far away would the car have to be if you were at ground level?

Here's the shot Ozwald allegedly took? according to immediate news story.

Other accounst said there was bushes in the way?

maybe they cut the bushes / trees and then took the photo, like they did for the MLK trajectory evidence?

Seems like a difficult shot for a guy without a high rating as a marksman?

Did n't they do that again with the "Terrorist Suicide bombers" who never completed one class in piloting and who never learned to land a small plane?

crazy conspiracy theory. Untrained pilots hit Towers and 550 mph less than 1K ft from sea level

I see a pattern here; They don't need their story to be logical; same with Russia Russia'

Illogical claims every time.

kekek

>>18018642

maybe it's harder to dispute illogic; because it becomes belief system.

Maybe most people are deaf to logic, have zero ability?

>>18018643

now they'll tag us a psychos, as they are.

Looks like they cut off the bottom of the image from the very start.

this came out blurry

>>18018644

They gotta look like they're busy

Otherwise too suspicious.

Best was just claim it doesn't exist. As with Hoover and the Mob.

Then when it comes out it does exist, set up some patsies so you look busy

Right Mueller?

>>18018677

weird they look like they're wearing masks. Like kabuki masks.

check bottom left

>>18018730

"Route 66, Weld, JFK, and To Kill a King '

http://copycateffect.blogspot.com/2012/08/weld.html

TV show aired before they killed President Kennedy

Tuesday is supposedly "into" the occult?

>>18018746

No. just no

If you have it in text form I'll read it, but not a video

Not after so many years with the C-a Altering the images.

>>18018718

Where is this from?

do you have a source?

What is it supposed to be?

>>18018710

once you figure out they are lying scum, and laughing at us; then it all makes sense

Looks like they erased President Kennedy's image here.

No kill shot shown?

>>18018821

doubt

>>18018011 pb

Heading / title is false