…reposting…

Why it's habbening

• Elon Musk releases devastating evidence of FBI meddling in federal elections days before 1/6/23

• Brunson case going before the Supreme Court on 1/6/23. Favorable ruling = mass arrests.

• "Sessions" was the gatekeeper who was responsible for getting Brunson case in front of SC ("Trust Sessions")

• Q identified the Supreme Court as the decision makers for mass arrests

• Jinny Thomas - wife of Supreme Court Justice alerted Mark Meadows that 'the Biden crime family' and 'ballot fraud co-conspirators' would be 'living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition,'

https://www.businessinsider.com/ginni-thomas-thought-biden-crime-family-would-be-sent-to-barges-off-gitmo-2022-3

>>18024372

>>18024381

>>18024409

>>18024422

>Remdesivir to be used knowing it would kill people.

first I've heard of his. source?

>>18024456

>>18024372

Ten days, to be exact

>>18024503

Hobbs now imposing "Sanctions" on Lake for questioning the election

>>18024511

>They are asking SC to carry out punishment on 388 people before a conviction ever happened.

Jan 6th "rioters" were removed from life before a conviction ever happened to. Justifiable arrest and detention happens. Suspicion of a crime results in arrest. The crime is clear if you read the .pdf.

>>18024526

> to.

too

>>18024540

reported

>>18024553

>He is asking for a ruling that removes 388 people from office and installs DJT as president.

There is a greater chance than not that the justices have already reviewed the case. Given that, there is a greater chance than not that they discuss the cases with their spouses.

Ginny Thomas knows. Do you think she was texting from pure emotion?

https://www.businessinsider.com/ginni-thomas-thought-biden-crime-family-would-be-sent-to-barges-off-gitmo-2022-3

>>18024579

>The Brunson case is just another dose hopium with a huge hangover

shill coping. nice.

>>18024606

Sarah "Ransom".

>>18024614

Why is all this coming out now?…days before 1/6 ruling?

>>18024681

>"The Supreme Court is scheduled to have a conference on January 6, 2023 where they will consider if they will indeed hear this case. It only takes four (4) justices in this instance to say “yes” for the hearing to proceed."

Getting mixed reports on this. Someone posted this was filed under "national security" and therefore a ruling can happen on 1/6. idk