Anonymous ID: eadc95 Dec. 27, 2022, 11:19 a.m. No.18024664   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4763 >>4966 >>5039

California Democrat Ted Lieu deletes tweet after Elon Musk fact-checks him

"Ted is linking to misleading data," Musk tweeted, calling for the platform's Community Notes to add missing information to the congressman's tweet.

 

Updated: December 27, 2022 - 1:29pm

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) deleted a tweet responding to the "Twitter Files" after CEO Elon Musk said he was pointing users to "misleading data" about COVID.

 

Lieu deleted his tweet Monday in response to reporter David Zweig's Twitter Files revelations showing how the social media platform censored factually accurate COVID information that conflicted with the federal government.

 

"The tweet you cite is in fact misleading. People of all ages at high risk from covid generally benefit from vaccines. Prior natural immunity may last only a few months. COVID appears to be a leading cause of death for children," Lieu tweeted with a link to a preprint study that was re-written after critics pointed out its inaccuracies.

 

"Ted is linking to misleading data," Musk tweeted, calling for the platform's Community Notes to add missing information to the congressman's tweet.

 

Lieu deleted the tweet and responded again with a similar post by changing "COVID appears to be a leading cause of death for children" to "COVID can still be lethal for some children" and linking to a Bloomberg article titled, "Covid Is Way More Lethal to Kids Than The Flu."

 

Critics again called out Lieu for spreading misleading information about COVID in his tweet.

 

Lieu defended his decision to delete the tweet.

"I actually follow the facts wherever they may lead, and will revise my views if there are new facts," he said.

 

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/california-democrat-ted-lieu-deletes-tweet-after-elon-musk-fact-check

 

He realy doesn't know what a "fact" is, and no one asked for his opinion. Do your own job Lieu

Anonymous ID: eadc95 Dec. 27, 2022, 11:21 a.m. No.18024676   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4701 >>4763 >>4966 >>5045 >>5091

Co-leader of Whitmer kidnapping plot sentenced to 16 years in prison

(Unfucking believable, where are all the FBI agents and CHS that set it up, Take this to the SC!)

 

A jury found Fox and co-defendant Barry Croft Jr. guilty of conspiracy charges related to the kidnapping plot.

By Madeleine Hubbard

 

Updated: December 27, 2022 - 12:10pm

 

Adam Fox, the man convicted of plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, was sentenced on Tuesday to 16 years in prison.

 

A jury found Fox and co-defendant Barry Croft Jr. guilty of conspiracy charges related to the kidnapping plot during a retrial in August after a jury earlier this year was unable to reach a unanimous verdict. 

 

Fox was sentenced in federal court on Tuesday, while Croft will be sentenced Wednesday, The Associated Press reported. Fox will receive credit for the more than two years behind bars since his arrest, and after his release, he will be supervised for five years.

 

Fox's sentence is the harshest so far in the plot to kidnap the Michigan Democrat. Earlier this month, three men involved in the scheme received sentences ranging from seven to 12 years. 

 

The government had requested life sentences for Fox and Croft, arguing that Fox was the "driving force urging their recruits to take up arms, kidnap the governor and kill those who stood in their way," while citing Croft's bomb-making skills and ideology as a factor.

 

Judge Robert J. Jonker said Fox's sentence was an adequate punishment and deterrent to future acts while life in prison was "too much."

 

"Something less than life gets the job done in this case," he said.

 

The case was rocked by allegations that the FBI used at least a dozen informants to infiltrate the extremist group and that an agent told an informant to lie. Attorneys for five men arrested in the plot had sought for the case to be dismissed on grounds of entrapment.

 

https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/co-leader-whitmer-kidnapping-plot-sentenced-16-years-prison

Anonymous ID: eadc95 Dec. 27, 2022, 11:25 a.m. No.18024694   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4725

West Point scrubbing Confederacy items including bust of former superintendent Robert E. Lee

Based on Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's approval of congressional recommendations.

Updated: December 26, 2022 - 10:54pm

 

Students returning to West Point next semester may notice a bit of the school's history missing.

 

The upstate New York military academy is removing 13 items that reference the Confederacy, including a portrait and bust of General Robert E. Lee, its superintendent before the Civil War, the Washington Examiner reports.

 

West Point made the removals following Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's approval of a congressional commission's recommendations. The school said the "historical artifacts will be professionally and respectfully handled" and "relocated to appropriate sites, including museums or other suitable venues."

 

The Naming Commission, created by the House and Senate Armed Services committees last year, will next consider items at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis.

 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/education/west-point-scrubbing-confederacy-items-including-bust-former

Anonymous ID: eadc95 Dec. 27, 2022, 11:31 a.m. No.18024734   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4749 >>4763 >>4966 >>5045 >>5091

Public health pundits warn DeSantis COVID vaccine probe could kill people

(Kek a probe can kill people???)

"Likely consequence" is that "many people will be misled into placing themselves and their families at risk of serious illness and death," former FDA official says.

Updated: December 26, 2022 - 9:18pm

 

Public health pundits are proclaiming that dire consequences will follow the grand jury investigation into COVID-19 vaccines commissioned by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), recently approved by the Florida Supreme Court.

 

Establishment medical experts told The Hill that the probe into potentially fraudulent claims about mRNA inoculations from their manufacturers, such as the efficacy of the products against infection and minimization of side effects, could get people killed.

 

"This is turning a matter of health and science into a political wedge issue, with the likely consequence that many people will be misled into placing themselves and their families at risk of serious illness and death," said Joshua Sharfstein (pic attached), vice dean for public health practice at Johns Hopkins University and former FDA principal deputy commissioner.

This guy was involved in the indoctrination and fear porn, that’s why it will kill people for them to know the culprits)

 

"These vaccines have been tested and scrutinized more than any other vaccine, and they continue to save lives," said Brian Castrucci, president and CEO of the de Beaumont Foundation, referring to the COVID vaccines first authorized on an emergency basis two years ago. "Vaccine safety is not a partisan issue and attempting to make it one puts lives at risk."

 

"No one has either inappropriately or purposely either overstated or understated the vaccine in any way," American Public Health Association executive director Georges Benjamin said, claiming the products "turned out to be a whole lot better than most people thought it would be." (Still lying!!!)

 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/public-health-pundits-warn-desantis-covid-vaccine-probe-could-kill

 

Benjamin with white hair

Anonymous ID: eadc95 Dec. 27, 2022, 11:46 a.m. No.18024830   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Arizona county was stumped by unregistered voters, old addresses, discrepant tallies, emails reveal

Updated: December 24, 2022 - 11:03pm

Following the Nov. 8 midterm elections, officials in Pima County, Ariz., struggled to determine how to handle provisional ballots cast by unregistered voters, discrepant provisional ballot totals, and ballots cast by voters with old addresses — even asking the secretary of state's office for guidance.

The confusion and uncertainty clouding county election officials' decision-making are revealed in newly released internal emails obtained through a public records request submitted by America First Legal Foundation.

A week after Election Day, Pima County Recorder Gabriella Cazares-Kelly wrote to Pima County Elections Director Constance Hargrove that the Recorder's Office found that 11 unregistered voters had cast provisional ballots but was unsure what to do about them because her office was "not normally in possession of the Provisional Ballots and my team is very opposed to opening them."

File Pages 32-35 from Recorder-Emails-Redacted - Watermarked(1)-2_Redacted.pdf

In reply, Hargrove sidestepped responsibility, writing to the recorder, "It is your call how you want to handle the provisional ballots."

There was also an issue with poll workers providing voters ballots with their previous rather than current addresses, potentially invalidating their votes.

"We're seeing that that Poll Workers issued ballots for a voter's previous address, instead of their new address, which puts them in the wrong precinct," Cazares-Kelly wrote in a Nov. 12 email to Hargrove. "This is not the voter's error, but it would make their vote ineligible.

File

Pages 29-31 from Recorder-Emails-Redacted - Watermarked (1)_Redacted.pdf

"This was an issue in the Primary Election as well and we decided to submit them as 'Duplication Required' and the races they were eligible to vote in were accepted.

"Are we okay to move forward with this process on our end, or are we wholly discarding ballots based on Poll Worker Error?"

Here, too, the elections director ducked responsibility. "Gabriella, it is not my decision how you proceed," she wrote. "I do not know what the statute states about duplicating provisionals."

In a Nov. 15 email, Pima County Elections Deputy Director Jeremy George told Cazares-Kelly: "We do not have the authority to make a determination about what ballot to accept. We will process any provisionals received and accepted based on that ballot, but we will not duplicate onto a different ballot or make a determination about what ballot a voter should have voted."

On Nov. 12, Cazares-Kelly reached out to the secretary of state's office for guidance on how to deal with the ballot issue.

File Pages 48-52 from Recorder-Emails-Redacted - Watermarked (1)-3_Redacted.pdf

"Since this was a poll worker error and not an out of precinct error on the voter's part, duplication of the eligible contests should be fine," replied State Elections Director Kori Lorick, who serves under Katie Hobbs in the secretary of state's office. "As with everything, please consult with your county attorney for legal advice."

Other issues in Pima County included "problem ballots" and ballot counting discrepancies.

"Problem ballots" were mentioned several times in emails with the Recorder's Office as ballots were being counted and processed.

File Pages 1-6 from Recorder-Emails-Redacted - Watermarked (1)_Redacted.pdf

On Nov. 15, the Recorder's Office reported having 460 problem ballots, and the recorder noted a discrepancy between the provisional and conditional provisional ballot totals tallied by her office and the Elections Department.

File Pages 24-25 from Recorder-Emails-Redacted - Watermarked (1)-2_Redacted.pdf

"[T]he number of provisional ballots and conditional provisional ballots wasn't adding up to your Day After Election Receipt, but we've started entering them to see exactly what we have," Cazares-Kelly wrote. "We were seeing: 1,615 provisionals in our system 650 not in our system = 2265

"On your receipt, the conditionals were separated, but if we add the conditional provisionals 2265 70= 2335 that gets us closer to the original number listed on your receipt. However, I've been using the numbers from your receipt for reporting purposes which was 2460 Provisionals and 70 Conditional Provisionals."

There also appeared to be confusion within the Recorder's Office, as the senior applications developer asked on Nov. 14 why "the provisional records received is only 1,615 in our export and Precinct Central states 2,266."….more

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/pima-county-az-election-non-registered-voters-wrong-addresses-problem

Anonymous ID: eadc95 Dec. 27, 2022, 11:51 a.m. No.18024883   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4966 >>5045 >>5091

FDA scrubs earlier warnings, now says Plan B contraception can’t cause abortion

Agency had earlier warned drug could inhibit implantation of human embryo.

Updated: December 24, 2022 - 3:19pm

 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration this week scrubbed earlier warnings it had issued about the possible effects of emergency contraception, claiming now thatthey work only to inhibit ovulation and do not function as abortion pills.

 

The FDA in its updated guidance on the Plan B pill had erased any mention of the possibility that the drug might prevent a human embryo from implanting in a woman’s uterus, thus effectively functioning as an abortion drug. (Effectively an abortion, because it's done by a drug)

 

Earlier warnings from the agency had said that the drug “may prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the womb (implantation).”

 

In its new guidance, the agency said that “evidence does not support that the drug affects implantation or maintenance of a pregnancy after implantation, therefore it does not terminate a pregnancy.”

 

Abortion and contraception advocates had long criticized the inclusion of the implantation warning on the drug, claiming regulators lacked evidence to support those conclusions.

 

(Anyone listening to the FDA at this point is retarded)

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/health/fda-scrubs-earlier-warnings-now-says-plan-b-contraception-cant-cause

Anonymous ID: eadc95 Dec. 27, 2022, 11:55 a.m. No.18024910   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4966 >>5045 >>5091

Judge approves $10M class-action settlement over mandatory COVID shots

Employees can apply for rehire within 90 days at their "previous seniority level," lawyers say.

Updated: December 26, 2022 - 10:33pm

 

A federal judge has approved a $10.3 million class-action settlement with a university healthcare system and workers who were denied religious exemptions from COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

 

Chicago-based NorthShore University HealthSystem came to terms with 500 current and former healthcare workers this summer, but it was only Friday that U.S. District Judge John Kness approved the settlement terms.

 

The class covers NorthShore team members who submitted religious exemption requests between July 1, 2021 and January 1, 2022, were denied exemptions and either took a vaccine to avoid termination or were fired or resigned due to their religious objections.

 

The order says no class members "timely opted out" of the settlement or filed a request for exclusion. The plaintiffs' lawyers at Liberty Counsel will receive $2.06 million in attorney's fees, and the 13 class representatives, $20,000 each. (that's it?)

 

Liberty Counsel said the settlement checks will be sent in 60 days. Employees who were fired can apply for rehire within 90 days, "and they will retain their previous seniority level," the law firm said. Several have already been rehired, Liberty Counsel said.

 

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/judge-approves-10b-class-action-settlement-over-mandatory-covid-shots

Anonymous ID: eadc95 Dec. 27, 2022, 12:19 p.m. No.18025038   🗄️.is 🔗kun

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Leadership and law enforcement failures within the U.S. Capitol left the complex

vulnerable on January 6, 2021. The Democrat-led investigation in the House of

Representatives, however, has disregarded those institutional failings that exposed

the Capitol to violence that day.

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs and the Senate

Committee on Rules and Administration conducted a bipartisan investigation in the

months after the attack. On June 8, 2021, the committees released their findings in a

joint staff report (hereinafter, Senate Report). This report supplements the Senate

Report and provides findings from the perspective of the House of Representatives

regarding those areas of inquiry that the Democrat-led investigation has thus far

ignored, specifically answering the important question of why the Capitol was left so

unprepared. This report is based on documents and communications obtained from

key witnesses, and interviews with U.S. Capitol Police leaders and rank-and-file

officers.

Many of the witnesses who spoke to investigators are U.S. Capitol Police (USCP)

sources. Some of the sources are current USCP officers and others are former

officers. Several of the sources who sat for interviews are USCP intelligence analysts

within the Intelligence and Interagency Coordination Division. Additionally,

investigators interviewed the Chief of the U.S. Capitol Police Tom Manger, the House

Sergeant at Arms William Walker, and the Assistant Director of the Intelligence and

Interagency Coordination Division Julie Farnam.

This report goes to great lengths to protect the identities of the line officers and

analysts who participated in interviews. Sources who cooperated with this

investigation described retaliation by USCP leadership for their participation in this

investigation and other investigations into the events of January 6, 2021. Additionally,

the Staff Director for the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th

Attack on the United States Capitol, David Buckley, has a track record of acting in a

retaliatory manner against whistleblowers. For those reasons, this report uses “USCP

source” to cite or otherwise refer to conversations with USCP employees who are not

in leadership positions. 2

1

2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

There are several reasons the Capitol was left unprepared on January 6, 2021,

including internal politics and unnecessary bureaucracy. Prior to that day, the U.S.

Capitol Police (USCP) had obtained sufficient information from an array of channels

to anticipate and prepare for the violence that occurred. However, officers on the

front lines and analysts in USCP’s intelligence division were undermined by the

misplaced priorities of their leadership. Those problems were exacerbated by the

House Sergeant at Arms, who was distracted from giving full attention to the threat

environment prior to January 6, 2021 by several other upcoming events.

Specifically, the leader of the USCP Intelligence and Interagency Coordination

Division failed to warn USCP leadership and line officers about the threat of violence,

despite the fact that IICD analysts gathered intelligence that clearly indicated a need

for a hardened security posture. In fact, IICD’s leader—Julie Farnam—spent the weeks

leading up to January 6, 2021 attempting to overhaul the division, including by

reassigning expert intelligence analysts to new roles and creating new processes for

synthesizing threat data. Information about planned protests and threats of violence

were siloed and not properly analyzed and disseminated during this key period

because of Farnam’s misplaced priorities. One IICD analyst testified to investigators:

“That unit was disbanded by her almost on day one. We, at the time of January 6, we

were not doing proactive searches of social media like we had been before. We were

strictly reactive and responding to requests for information.” This is also substantiated

by USCP’s own internal after-action report that was drafted in June of 2021.

Similarly, then-House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving—who served on the Capitol Police

Board by virtue of his position—succumbed to political pressures from the Office of

Speaker Pelosi and House Democrat leadership leading up to January 6, 2021. He

coordinated closely with the Speaker and her staff and left Republicans out of

important discussions related to security. As a critical member of the Capitol Police

Board, the House Sergeant at Arms had an obligation to all Members, staff, and USCP

officers to keep them safe by consulting stakeholders without partisan preference

 

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/capitol-reax-aviation-terror-threat-day-jan-6-riot-foretold-lax-security-texts

 

REPORT

 

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2022-12/FINAL HouseGOPReport of Jan. 6 Investigation.pdf

Anonymous ID: eadc95 Dec. 27, 2022, 12:23 p.m. No.18025056   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5091

Durham probe costs nearly five times less than Mueller probe, data shows

Mueller's inquiry cost a total of $32 million while Durham's has cost at least $6.5 million so far.

Updated: December 26, 2022 - 12:53pm

 

Special counsel John Durham's probe into the FBI's investigation into ties between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia has cost the Justice Department less than $10,000 a day on average, nearly five times less than the daily cost of special counsel Robert Mueller's probe into the discredited Trump-Russia collusion allegations.

 

Durham's ongoing probe has cost at least $6.5 million from Oct. 19, 2020, until Sept. 30, 2022, according to Justice Department data released Friday.

 

This means Durham spends an average of over $9,100 a day on his probe.

From May 17, 2017 through May 29, 2019, Mueller's inquiry cost $32 million, multiple outlets reported. Mueller's investigation cost an average of more than $43,000 a day.

 

Comparing the prices of the two investigations, Mueller's probe costs about 4.7 times more than Durham's on average.

 

Durham's inquiry secured the guilty plea of former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith for altering a document about the government's surveillance of a former Trump campaign adviser.

 

However, his inquiry suffered several setbacks this year when Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussman and key Steele dossier source Igor Danchenko were acquitted. Durham is expected to produce a final report on his findings.

 

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/durham-probe-costs-nearly-five-times-less-mueller-probe-data-shows