>>18024779 lb
>Doubt SC will take up Brunson and if they did they would just rule against it. But this case by them ignoring it or ruling against it sets them up for the treason call also. Not sure what happens at that point.
Anon, you need to seek out the several interviews that Loy Brunson has given and you will understand as well as other anons discussing this, there is not going to be a "case" argued in front of the SC. The Solicitor General of the US waived all rights on behalf of all defendants in a one page, one paragraph, response. UNPRECEDENTED.
The conference scheduled for Jan 6th is solely to rule yay, nay. SC head clerk called Raylan Brunson to tell him the SC was going to take his case under Rule 11 which involves national security and allows the petitioner to bypass the appellate court. When this happened, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals quit slow walking the case and ruled on Brunson. They ruled against it. The head clerk called Raylan a second time to inform him that since the 10th CCoA's had issued a ruling that he could remove the Rule 11 part of the petition and not only were they still going to accept the appeal, the SC clerk asked Raylan to inclued certain other information that "They" wanted included in this case and then asked him how soon can you get us the revised petition?
"But this case by them ignoring it or ruling against it sets them up for the treason call also".-You
It has been, ah hmm. "suggested" to SCOTUS that they too will honor their "Oath" and the consequences of not doing so will tie their fate to those of defendants.
8-0. KJB is disqualified as her appointment and confirmation were unlawful actions by defendants.
Now, anything is possible but we all know what democrat defendants seek to do to the court. We all know that the Bidan Admin and the Garland DOJ endangeredJusitces by not enforcing Federal Law and arresting those malcontents when they protested at their private homes. Justices are well aware of all of this. This action is brought by an American Civilian, not Perkins Coie or any other B. A. R. unregistered foreign agent(s) and seeks the removal of defendants for violating their "Oath of Office". Defendants unlawfully ignored the Constitutionally required procedure and investigation into the legitimate claims by over 100 members of the House and Senate that certain state's certification of their electoral votes were in question and these defendants ignored that and held the vote on certification anyway.
BOOM