>>18041259 pb
The list of Congressmen listed as defendants in the original Brunson complaint was, I believe, derived from the "NAY"s found in theCongressional record for Jan 6, 2021.
PDF- https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2021/01/06/CREC-2021-01-06.pdf
online viewing- https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CREC-2021-01-06 (to generate your own PDF or review online)
Though this Congressional Record was attached to the one of the early pleadings in the lower court, I do not believe it is currently in the record before the Supreme Court.
Theoretically, any Court is only supposed to rule on the factual record before it. But one is not expected to have the entire record before the Supreme Court on a Writ for Certioriari - which is where the Court decides whether the case meets criteria for Supreme Court review and decides whether to ask for briefs on the merits of the matter itself.
Maybe some clever person can figure out how to get this Congressional Record before the Supreme Court - either a copy of a request for Judicial Notice - before January 6, 2021 (when the matter is set for closed door conference - not a hearing).
[-Not sure how this fits: Supreme Court Rule 12.7 "In any document fled with this Court, a party may cite or quote from the record, even if it has not been transmitted to this Court."]
This Congressional Record (citations above) contains dozens of pages of objections to various State's unprecedented (and un-Constitutional) "Covid19" voting processes submitted to Congress and VP Pence "to count" - and therefore, objections to proceeding with the certification of the 2020 election - made by patriotic Representatives and Senators. The Congressional Record shows who voted to allow the objection(s) and who declined, i.e., who voted to move on to certifying the 2020 election count submitted by the states without doing anything about properly submitted objections. Which is what they ultimately did.
The Brunson case says, among other things, that those voting "NAY" threw their OATHs of OFFICE away by not investigating properly presented objections before certifying the results of the 2020 election.
Citing the Constitution and federal codes, the assertions continue, among other things: The redress sought by citizens for wrongs done, if substantiated, should result in those Congressmen who refused an investigation in favor of rubber stamping, despite properly presented objections, be removed from office, and never be allowed to hold office again.
And some other interdasting things are also raised (in the Writ and/or pleadings below).
Fun Fact:
Supreme Court Rule 16. Disposition of a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
-
After considering the documents distributed under Rule 15, the Court will enter an appropriate order.The order may be a summary disposition on the merits.
=Which sounds like adisposition ON THE MERITS, not just whether to go forward with full briefing of the case,CAN HAPPEN at this Writ stage(of course, that means either way).
=>ALL the more REASON, if I am reading it correctly, to get the Jan 6, 2021 Congressional Record (links above) or request for judicial notice thereof before the Supreme Court in advance of next Friday, the closed-door conference date (w/o parties present) of Jan 6, 2022.
Resources:
Supreme Court Rules (2019)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/filingandrules/rules_guidance.aspx (rules download as 2019RulesoftheCourt-1.pdf)