dChan
Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 3:31 p.m. No.18068583   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8648 >>8672 >>8832

>>18068505 lb/pb Muh Brunson will get defendants fired Friday 1/6

 

>defendants rights were waived. immediate relief at the conference. lurk moar.

 

When confronted with a Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed in the United States Supreme Court, some attorneys will play the odds and let the Court deal with a Petition without even filing a Brief in Opposition. A Respondent may choose to waive the right to oppose a Petition that seems clearly without merit. This will save time and money without any substantial risk if the Respondent feels certain that Certiorari will be denied.

 

https://www.cocklelegalbriefs.com/blog/preparing-your-brief/should-i-skip-the-brief-in-opposition/

 

Supreme Court Rules Rule 15. Briefs in Opposition; Reply Briefs; Supplemental Briefs

 

Rule 15. Briefs in Opposition; Reply Briefs; Supplemental Briefs

 

  1. A brief in opposition to the petition for a writ of certiorari may be filed by the respondent in any case, but is not mandatory except in a capital case,

 

It wasn't the defendants who waived, it was the US Solicitor General. There are a couple of valid reasons for that. Indulge your fantasy at your own risk, Anon. You'll likely cry yourself to sleep again this Friday.

Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 3:39 p.m. No.18068631   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18068606

>anon, SC can decide the case on 1/6 if they choose to do so… or schedule it for pleading and a hearing… or dismiss. it's all on teh table at this point.

We'll know more in three days, Anon.

Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 3:48 p.m. No.18068695   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18068648

>it is unprecedented what the SC did in this case

Anon thinks it's unprecedented that the lower courts allowed the case to make it this far. It's a well-argued case but even so it's shocking that the petition made it to conference. Anon is very hopeful but tempered by realism. Anon expects a simple conference and hopes the petitioner is granted a hearing in the 1/6 conference.

Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 3:51 p.m. No.18068714   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8728 >>9195

>>18068672

>THIS

This?

Rule 11. Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals before Judgment

A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court. See 28 U. S. C. § 2101(e).

Supreme Court Rules Rule 11. Certiorari to a United States Court of Appeals before Judgment

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/rule_11

Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 3:58 p.m. No.18068753   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9216

>>18068728

>>Rule 11.

>That peski rule

>Bingo!

That rule allows important cases to skip parts of the appellate process (Appeals Courts) and petition the Supreme Court. Brunson has filed a petition with the Supreme Court. There is a conference scheduled for Friday in which the SC Justices will decide if the petitioner should be granted a hearing. Anon hopes they grant Brunson an expedited hearing, however that hearing will likely be scheduled at a later date.

Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 4:08 p.m. No.18068822   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18068766

> the amount of children being damaged as we speak is unforgivable.

 

Agreed, Anon. Difficult to comprehend. It has been over half a decade:

 

The truth would sound so outrageous most Americans would riot, revolt, reject, etc.

The pedo networks are being dismantled.

The child abductions for satanic rituals (ie Haiti and other 3rd world countries) are paused (not terminated until players in custody).

We pray every single day for God’s guidance and direction as we are truly up against pure evil.

Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 4:37 p.m. No.18069019   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18068997

>Gowdy

>Is military courts affiliated

>Can't be in government and prosecute them at same time

>Conflicts ya see

Love that to be true. He's a good orator. Until proven otherwise, though, he's HBB (hired, bribed, blackmailed) based on his years of prior conduct.

Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 4:39 p.m. No.18069033   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18069002

>Would you sedate a cardiac arrest patient?

>Is that right?

If you have to intubate a patient it is best to sedate them. The choking sensation is intolerable for most.

Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 4:48 p.m. No.18069102   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9111 >>9129

>>18069073

Any time a patient is intubated that patient should be sedated. When not sedated they tend to react to the choking sensation by ripping out the endotracheal intubation that is keeping them alive.

Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 5:05 p.m. No.18069229   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9252

>>18069183

>Commotio Cordis

Always thought it was impact followed by immediate ventricular fibrillation. The timing of the impact was crucial to the development of commotio cordis because it had to disrupt the heart's rhythm at exactly the right moment in the heart's cycle to occur.

 

" Commotio Cordis refers to the sudden arrhythmic death caused by a low/mild chest wall impact. Commotio Cordis is seen mostly in athletes between the ages of 8 and 18 who are partaking in sports with projectiles such as baseballs, hockey pucks, or lacrosse balls. These projectiles can strike the athletes in the middle of the chest with a low impact but enough to cause the heart to enter an arrhythmia. Martial arts is a sport in which a strike of a hand can also cause the heart to change it’s rhythm. Without immediate CPR and defibrillation the prognosis of commotio cordis is not very good. This condition is extremely dangerous with rare survival."

https://ksi.uconn.edu/emergency-conditions/cardiac-conditions/commotio-cordis/#:~:text=Commotio%20Cordis%20refers%20to%20the,hockey%20pucks%2C%20or%20lacrosse%20balls.

Anonymous ID: 8d2d30 Jan. 3, 2023, 5:10 p.m. No.18069263   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18069195

>it did not make it to the docket with the original rule 11 language…that was stripped.

Thanks, Anon. The discussion concerned hyping of a conference on 1/6 into a hearing. 1/6 is a conference. If the petition makes it through conference then a hearing will be scheduled.