>>18150314

>Why were natives given vaccines on first go around?

Prolly very close to the same reason that the elderly were jabbed first, over and over, even though the so-called clinical trials explicitly excluded the elderly and the frail.

No option, indeed.

The prioritization on essentials like the healthcare system, military defense, and uni/college faculty/students is all of a piece. Likewise the targeting of the judiciary structures.

This paved the way, this toll on human life, for the employer-enforced targeting of people of working age. Another piece in the broader jigsaw puzzle picture.

Then, with all of that pain and suffering induced, the children became targets. Soften up the parents and then detach parental authority from the best interests of their children.

Which then presses onward to prioritization, in the promotions, of women who are pregnant or who wish to become pregnant. This category of human beings includes mothers AND the future generations. Again, the so-called clinical trials expressly excluded pregnant and lactating women, just as young children had been excluded.

Safe and Effective is the motto of imprisonment whereby your city, your own home, your workplace becomes your gulag. Mixing metaphors here but S & E now is the official replacement of “ARBEIT MACHT FREI”, Work makes you free", that was the message on the gate of the concentration camp where political prisoners languished under SLAVE labour.

Those same political prisoners were forced to fabricate and to erect that message over that gate.

Not the upside down B.

>>18157763

No one, no nurse and no doctor, had the information nor the good reasoning to recommend - to even allow - C19 shots as Safe and Effective.

They especially lacked the basis for prioritizing the elderly and the frail, yet they pushed, administered it, did not oppose it. And their licensing boards penalized any who dared dissent - or even report adverse events (as the law requires).

Targeting the supply chain via the truckers was an obvious show of their true intentions. People just did not wish to believe in such evil. Many were distracted by the fearmongering and coping with the authoritarianism that recruited employers, unions, education, and parents to impose the nonsense. Complicit compromised normal impulse to object. The apparent, not real, widespread compliance became the message that too many assumed was real. And thus it became real.

Women of working age, men of working age, were never so threatened by a virus that such measures could be justified. Never. And the subset that were of childbearing age were even less at risk. AND their children even less at risk, again. The elderly and frail had survival rates of 97% or better.

But guess what two categories disappeared as the catch-all Covid category took over?

1. Influenza and Influenza-like Illness.

2. Medical error.

This coincided with the fraudulent C19 testing which then was used to vacuum-up the deaths due to these two causes.

Who benefits from that?

Many so-called stakeholders. None more compliant with covidmania than the very governing authorities in control of long term care homes and hospitals and the medical profession.

Self-interested stakeholders may not have been part of the original scheme but they acted opportunistically.

Doubt this? Where in society do you find the continued imposition of masking and jabbing.

And beyond the heathcare system, look to the judiciary which remains under the sway of covidmania. It is the "reservoir" of this fearmongering and authoritarian social virus.

The expunge society of this existential threat, what would be the go-to tool? The disinfecting effect of light – transparency and accountability.

However, think to historical examples such as the long struggle against slavery across the world and in locations such as the USA. The shedding of blood across generations did not end with the acceleration of the Civil War.

Now, consider how the strong hold that slavery had on the judiciary - on the highest court of the land. Consider the so-called science of slavery and of racism. Extend this from the beginning of the colonies to the civil rights movement centuries later. And then the perversion of those hard won victories.

This evil has been ever with us. The abuses of the Indian Act have long signaled the need to abolish it. Well, today, the so-called stakeholders desire far more than the abuses of the Indian Act and they have their compliant locals to impose great harm and suffering and death.

Who benefits?

Attorney General Lametti loses court ruling on use of emergency powers against Freedom Convoy

https://www.westernstandard.news/news/attorney-general-lametti-loses-court-ruling-on-use-of-emergency-powers-against-freedom-convoy/article_55f4ec32-a309-11ed-b9d6-dbdaf06052b6.html

QUOTE

Attorney General David Lametti has lost a Federal Court ruling on his use of emergency powers against the Freedom Convoy. A judge ordered that internal emails, which contradicted cabinet claims of a national crisis, must be admitted into evidence, according to Blacklock's Reporter.

“Evidence of the cabinet proceedings that led to the decision to invoke the Emergencies Act was not disclosed despite repeated requests,” wrote Justice Richard Mosley. The internal emails were “essential to the just and proper determination” of whether cabinet broke the law, he said.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association asked that internal records be submitted to the Court. The documents were already disclosed by the Public Order Emergency Commission.

unQUOTE

Lametti's legal opinion was claimed by the Trudeau Cabinet as the legal basis for invoking the EMA. The document was submitted to the Public Inquiry but all 10 pages were redacted.

https://www.blacklocks.ca/cant-hide-emails-fed-judge/

>>18275069 >>18070697 .

Page 9 of the redacted 10 page document re Lametti's legal opinion.

One bit of text was not redacted: "s. 38"

Speculation: Emergencies Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 22 s.38

This would be citation of the section in the EMA that is about War Emergency, rather than the Public Order Emergency that the Cabinet submitted as basis for its motion to Parliament to invoke the emergency measures.

See Pics: War Emergency?

For Emphasis: this is speculation based on the unredacrted "s.38" on page 9 of Lametti's heavily redacted 10-page egal opinion.

Sauces:

https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/files/exhibits/SSM.NSC.CAN.00003223_REL.0001.pdf?t=1675359095

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-4.5/page-3.html#h-214097

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-4.5/index.html

https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/files/documents/Transcripts/POEC-Public-Hearings-Volume-29-November-23-2022.pdf