“Hypocrisy and fraud have short wings.”
https://prepareforchange.net/2023/01/11/hypocrisy-and-fraud-have-short-wings/
as soon as the new year got going, there was good news: More polar bears are rampaging through the Canadian Arctic again. Independent media report on this, citing research results from the Canadian Ministry of the Environment. A report from the agency states:
“Science and the Inuit Quajimajatuquangit [Indigenous people of the Canadian Arctic] are now observing higher numbers of polar bears; management goals are more focused on conserving or reducing stocks.”
This is no doubt surprising. For years, climate fanatics have claimed that poor
polar bears are on the brink of extinction because of man-made climate change. First and foremost, the Democrat Al Gore, Vice President under Bill Clinton, stormed with his film “An Inconvenient Truth” in 2006.
The mainstream takes the same line. Five years ago, for example, the Guardian published a video clip that was viewed 1.7 million times on YouTube alone – showing an emaciated polar bear on the verge of starvation. The title: “Video about starving polar bears proves the effects of climate change.” In 2020, the BBC shared the same bad news: polar bears will be extinct “by the end of the century” due to climate change.
But in the Canadian Arctic, polar bears now seem to be becoming a nuisance – and some wonder if the Environment Department’s announcement that it is focusing on “conservation” and “reduction” means killing.
Better we deal with some more good news: The environment editor Chris Monckton reports that the “pause in global warming has now been extended to eight years and four months”. So there has been no global warming for 100 months. This emerges from the latest satellite data from the US National Space Science and Technology Center at the University of Alabama.
But that’s information that doesn’t fit the catastrophe scenario of the WEF, ultra-wealthy philanthropists, or the political establishment. These propagate that humans, with their carbon dioxide emissions, are largely responsible for the relatively slight warming of global temperatures over the last 150 years or so. Although evidence of a causal link is lacking, they have pledged to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.
Anyone who dares to deviate from this so-called “scientific consensus” is defamed. How can that be? How does such hype come about? And why do many scientists jump on the train of climate change catastrophes against their better knowledge?
The physicist and climatologist Prof. Werner Kirstein provided plausible explanations in a conversation on Stein-Zeit.tv in July 2019: Universities are chronically underfunded and therefore have to strive for state-funded research topics in order to be able to survive. As soon as the word climate change is mentioned, the money flows. No scientist who is still working can say anything on the subject that is politically “not opportune”. We are all being fooled. Continue…