Jim knocked it out of the park.
Welp, that does it. Crystal Balls are not real.
Huh… That's neato.
Current reigning champ.
Old champ. With historical significance in the separation of church/state argument, even.
>Kevin it is!
It's a great civics lesson if you're paying attention. All the wheeling/dealing over votes for key positions in exchange for key positions/favors/dollars.
>Is Trump distancing himself from his base purposefully?
No. His base can read between the lines. Breaching doesn't mean "we're there yet". It means just that, breaching. It's a complicated case. Lotta ins, lotta out, lotta what have yous.
Means JJ will be speaker one day. Perhaps not just yet.
True story:
Relative had a chow chow. That dog was a manipulative fuck. That dog knew how to make relatives make anon no want to go play outside, and they made me play outside anyway. Chow chow attackeded anon one day. That was the last day chow chow was allowed to be anywhere near anon. Was a personal victory for anon to see chow chow go bye bye. Pics unrelated (maybe).
>Would love to see this vote drag on for DAYS in the House.
Oh, I would, too. But these are the tea leaves anon's reading.
Anon pulled random image from internets with tea leaves. Not sure how the Q shit got in there. That's all done been debunked.
Deadlifts are a meme workout.
>it even shortly discusses Jesus' childhood.
That's crazy. How come the Bible doesn't do that?
>Quran is ~1400 after Bible so it might have some more updated info in there?
Makes sense. TY anon!
Adams is easy.
-
"Hypnotist"
-
His entire profession is to set opposing arguments while the real truth is somewhere in between.
-
Sets his followers on a perpetual quest to argue opposing points while obscuring the truth.
-
When truth is brought up, he ignores it or gives arguments to get debate back to the opposing points.
-
Absolutely has to give a stream every day because it's now his biggest source of income.
Adams also advocates that complete anonymity on the web means the person isn't trying to make valid points. He went somewhat counter to Peterson in saying "I have to know at least SOMETHING about the person I'm debating with", which is false. The only reason you need to know something about someone is because you need an angle to persuade away from the actual argument.
Adams is good, but he's lost his touch, and it really started going downhill after the vaxx episode, and he dropped off significantly after the "Shelly" incident. You can still learn stuff from watching him, but it's mostly relegated to "how persuaders operate" kind of stuff.