>>18099738 (pb)
Brunson
>i was assuming this case had 0.00% chance of being granted cert.
>apparently, though, the SC took it to conference in a manner that suggests there may be a chance - say, a 0.01% chance
>it's the Rule 11 acceptance and the desire to get it to conference on J6 that has me raise an eyebrow. that said, I'm still not thinking this will get granted cert.
Oh yeah? What about the court 'national security' language buzz and the connection to E.O. No.13848 Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election Required Ratcliff Report that the CCP Dunnit Report over which Trump had been briefed within 30-days under the E.O.? Was Congress scheduled to be briefed on Ratcliffe's Report before the Pelosi/Schumer DS "Insurrection" FF caused the failure of Congress to hear the Ratcliffe Report or debate ANY of the 140 Members' oppositions to the E.C. Votes certification?
And what about the entire Twitter Files (likely ALL platforms) Censorship-laundering
and Hunter Laptop 'hide the sausage' deal with the FBI directives which DEFLECTED all attention AWAY from the beyond any doubt evidence that the Biden Family are nothing but fully-compd CCP stooges? Our Security State actually conspired in the stolen election Treason in order to get Chyna's guy into the White House.
Ya think that SCOTUS just MIGHT take this case in light of all the above (and other reasons per attached) as well as take the Brunson case perhsps seeking atonement for betraying their oaths, caving, when Chief Traitor Roberts bullied them all to vote to REJECT the Texas, et al v. Swing States case on standing or jurisdictional grounds when it was clear that this "States v. States" case was obviously, if not exclusively, and rightfully before the U.S. Supreme Court?
https://amac.us/supreme-court-dockets-brunson-v-adams-case-that-challenges-the-failure-of-congress-to-investigate-disputed-electoral-college-votes/
https://ralandbrunson.com/
https://www.westernjournal.com/everybody-missed-bombshell-huckabee-announcement-scotus-case-flip-2020-boot-biden-harris/