>>18140714 (LB)
Yeah, it's a flexible concept, that can make sense applied correctly.. but what I've read of the gnostics paints them as a bunch of sophists that basically said "ah see, the god we think we know is the demiurge, so its the demiurge that's given us our list of virtues and sins, therefore we should reject what this false god teaches and do the opposite" and they were like, pederasts and thieves and spit on the cross and stuff like thatโฆ which, the cross in my view is debatable, but thieving and pedo stuff is gay.