It's in a very very public spot it needs to be OK from all sides.
I will need modification if it stays.
clearly for 10 million it's a money laundering event.
and they figured they'd twist the knife by making it a phallus from the other side. ha ha.
shameful.
It will be modified, this is a surety, or removed.
the cost was 10 million to some connected person.
10 million dollars.
so the point: money laundering.
for that money it should be viewable without a contriversy from all vantage points.
if it looks like a phallus from the back side they;ll need to put in some friezes as a wall to block the view from the pathways past the sculpture.
OR
just give it to some dot org, gift it to the Obama library.
send it on a world tour.
get it out of Boston.
phew.
tasteless art doesn't have to be forever.
the 'art budget' is mandated as part of building codes and really it's just a collosal waste of money. You get scrap metal pretending to be abstract expressionism and for all we know it's filled up with toxic waste.
enough is enough. Stop the crap art money laundering scam.
so the shills just revert to constant boob distraction?
it's annoying to filter out the cravenness of it.
why are they stuck on tits and porn tonight?