tyb
https://www.weforum.org/people/elise-stefanik
https://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/young-leaders-circle-forum-elise-stefanik-8567.html
As chair of the House Republican Conference since 2021, ''she is the third-ranking House Republican.'' Wikipedia
Born: 1984 (age 38 years), Albany, NY
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ceiling-whacks/
Obama on the Debt Limit
snopes.com/fact-check/ceiling-whacks
July 28, 2011
'' Claim: In 2006, U.S. Senator Barack Obama spoke out against raising the U.S. government debt limit.''
TRUE Example: [Collected via e-mail, July 2011]
Did Obama really say this before he was president?
The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure.'
'' It is a sign that the US Government can not pay its own bills. ''
'' It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. ''
'' Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. ''
'' Leadership means that "the buck stops here." ''
'' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. ''
'' America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.' ''
Origins: In 2006, while serving his first term as a freshman U.S. Senator from Illinoise, Barack Hussain Obama made the remarks attributed to him above during a discussion in the U.S. Senate prior to the call for votes on raising the debt limit.
The full text of his remarks in the Senate on 16 March 2006 are:
Mr. President, I rise today to talk about America's debt problem.
The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can't pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies.
Over the past 5 years, our federal debt has increased by $3.5 trillion to $8.6 trillion. That is "trillion" with a "T." That is money that we have borrowed from the Social Security trust fund, borrowed from China and Japan, borrowed from American taxpayers. And over the next 5 years, between now and 2011, the President's budget will increase the debt by almost another $3.5 trillion.
Numbers that large are sometimes hard to understand. Some people may wonder why they matter. Here is why: This year, the Federal Government will spend $220 billion on interest. That is more money to pay interest on our national debt than we'll spend on Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program. That is more money to pay interest on our debt this year than we will spend on education, homeland security, transportation, and veterans benefits combined. It is more money in one year than we are likely to spend to rebuild the devastated gulf coast in a way that honors the best of America.
1/
And the cost of our debt is one of the fastest-growing expenses in the Federal budget. This rising debt is a hidden domestic enemy, robbing our cities and States of critical investments in infrastructure like
bridges, ports, and levees;
robbing our families and our children of critical investments in education and health care reform;
robbing our seniors of the retirement and health security they have counted on.
Every $ dollar we pay in interest is a dollar that is not going to invest in America's priorities. Instead, interest payments are a significant tax on all Americans
— a debt tax that Washington doesn't want to talk about. If Washington were serious about honest tax relief in this country, we would see an effort to reduce our national debt by returning to responsible fiscal policies.
But we are not doing that.
Despite repeated efforts by Senators Conrad and Feingold, the Senate continues to reject a return to the commonsense Pay-go rules that used to apply. Previously, Pay-go rules applied both to increases in mandatory spending and to tax cuts.
The Senate had to abide by the commonsense budgeting principle of balancing expenses and revenues. Unfortunately, the principle was abandoned, and now the demands of budget discipline apply only to spending. As a result, tax breaks have not been paid for by reductions in Federal spending, and thus the only way to pay for them has been to increase our deficit to historically high levels and borrow more and more money. Now we have to pay for those tax breaks plus the cost of borrowing for them.
Instead of reducing the deficit, as some people claimed, the fiscal policies of this administration and its allies in Congress will add more than $600 million in debt for each of the next 5 years. That is why I will once again cosponsor the Pay-go amendment and continue to hope that my colleagues will return to a smart rule that has worked in the past and can work again.
Our debt also matters internationally.
My friend, the ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee, likes to remind us that it took 42 Presidents 224 years to run up only $1 trillion of foreign-held debt. This administration did more than that in just 5 years. Now, there is nothing wrong with borrowing from foreign countries. But we must remember that the more we depend on foreign nations to lend us money, the more our economic security is tied to the whims of foreign leaders whose interests might not be aligned with ours.
Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that "the buck stops here.'' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.
''I, therefore, intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit.''
The shortened quote now attributed to him is a verbatim capture of the opening and closing paragraphs of his remarks of 16 March 2006. (The Senate vote held later that day on a resolution to increase the debt limit passed by a 52-48 margin, with Senator Obama voting against it.)
2/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ceiling-whacks/
President Obama has undergone a change of position regarding raising the debt limit. In a 15 April 2011 Good Morning America interview, President Obama said this of his reasons for doing so:
I think that it's important to understand the vantage point of a senator versus the vantage point of a president. When you're a senator, traditionally what's happened is, this is always a lousy vote. Nobody likes to be tagged as having increased the debt limit
— for the United States by a trillion dollars. As president, you start realizing, you know what, we, we can't play around with this stuff. This is the full faith and credit of the United States. And so that was just an example of a new senator making what is a political vote as opposed to doing what was important for the country. And I'm the first one to acknowledge it.
Last updated: 7 October 2013
Sources:
Congressional Record. "Remarks by Sen. Barack Obama."
16 March 2006.
Farley, Robert. "Obama Says Reagan Raised Debt Ceiling 18 Times; George W. Bush 7 Times."
St. Petersburg Times. 26 July 2011.
Stephanopoulos, George. "President Obama One-on-One."
Good Morning America. 15 April 2011.
Werner, Erica. "WH: Obama Regrets Vote Against Raising Debt Limit."
Associated Press. 11 April 2011.
3/3
Jan 19, 2023
Elise Stefanik Gets up and RIPS Nancy Pelosi to SHREDS
https://youtu.be/AWd5TIxZqm4