So let Anon get this straight.
CCP is asserting a dialectic inversion..
Just flip the temporal order of the two instances of 'praxis'.
How to smear and reduce awakening public ('fetters of dialectic' from within US) as smearing China?
How about 'mistakenly' 'allow' a three bus sized 'DATA GATHERING' BLIMP to violate US airspace?
They set up their own pretext antithesis first in time, then the next object is that the CCP SOILS ALL instantiations of response by associating/naming it all under a banner of ''US media, politicians are 'smearing China'.
A dialectic of being both sides of a 'conflict', then same source claims persecution of what would in fact be a justified 'reaction' of receiving that information as what should have a public apology, for an eventual narrative of an objectification of a posturing of authority over the information outside of China's own borders.
>Foreign ministry says China "never violated the territory and airspace of any sovereign country"
Confucius institute, Konnech, CCP Police Stations all on US soil.
WhY dO tHeY pErSeCuTe mE sO?