>what is the moral of the fable, "the tortoise and the hare?"
>>18293412
>>18293418
if you answered "slow and steady wins the race," or something along those lines, i have a question for you… what kind of fuckwit would believe that's the moral of the story? if "slow and steady wins the race" were the moral, that would mean it's ALWAYS true. that's what a "moral" is. that would mean that every time a tortoise and a hare raced, the tortoise would win. DOES THAT SOUND LIKE A UNIVERSAL TRUTH TO YOU?
so my next question is, where did you get that half-assed hare-brained idea? did you finger it up all by youseself? or did youse pubic school teach 'splain it to you like dat?
the ONLY reason the tortoise won is because the hare was arrogant and over-confident, and fell asleep during the race. so the moral of the story would be something like "over-confidence is your worst enemy," or "pride goeth before a fall," or anything along those lines.
if you came up with the retarded version on your own, well, sorry, you're a dumbass. that's bad enough, but maybe there's still hope for you. if you were TOLD the idiotic moral, and you BELIEVED it, without QUESTIONING it, congratulations, you are a perfect example of the triumph of public education.
because that's exactly the real purpose of public INDOCTRINTION. to get you to FAIL. to get you to be lazy and not apply yourself; to tell you it's "OK" to put forth a half-assed effort, because hey, slow and steady will win the race. what they OUGHT to be doing is instilling you with a competitive spirit to ALWAYS DO YOUR BEST; always bust your ass; always give 100% effort; and warn you of the consequences of false pride and underestimating the competition. but that's exactly what they DON'T want you to do. they want you to believe you can be a lazy fuck-up, and things will magically work out alright. they WANT you to grow up to be a lazy stupid underachiever incapable of thinking for yourself. slow and steady. RIGHT.
NEWSFLASH: you been duped! i guess you shouldn't feel TOO bad. i've asked the same question of thousands of college freshman, and NOT ONCE did i get a correct answer. at the very least, you had the courage to take the risk of putting yourself out there and giving an answer. good on you.
>>18293403
>>18293406
>>18293410
if you blew off the question, then you're worse than either of the people described above. they're just not too bright, or more than likely, victims of public indoctrination. you're probly dumb too, but on top of that, you're a COWARD afraid to give the wrong answer, so you substitute bravado and condescending phony superiority as a way to side-step the question and avoid consequences. or you didn't respond at all. you are a chickenshit who will do or say ANYTHING to save face. because you believe LOOKING smart is more important than BEING smart.
i got a NEWSFLASH for YOU: you don't belong here. they need people like you over on the deepstate side. shallow, vain, stupid, and CORRUPTIBLE. you have a big future as a DS shill. if you kiss enough ass and fuck enough children, maybe you'll even get your own podcast. who knows, you might even get to be an intern for a congressman.