TYB
Sidney Powell's Defending the Republic
How much more are they hiding?
Feb 6, 2023
1- It leads one to imagine what else they are hiding.
Report: Biden Administration Tried to Hide Chinese Spy Balloon from American Public
QUOTE: The Biden administration was aware of the Chinese spy balloon entering United States airspace on January 28 but tried to hide its existence from the American people until being forced to go public, according to a report on Saturday.
Bloomberg News reported that the Biden administration was “well aware” that the balloon had entered U.S. airspace on Saturday, January 28, but decided to keep quiet about it so as not to ruin a planned trip by Secretary of State Antony Blinken to China.
As it turns out, US authorities were well aware of the unidentified object that had entered American airspace on Jan. 28, that had then left and re-entered over North Idaho on Tuesday. But with such a high-profile trip at stake, keeping it on the down-low was key.
However, on Wednesday, February 1, a Billings, Montana, resident spotted the balloon around 5:30 p.m. local time, and the next day, a local Montana paper published a report about it. Later that day, late Thursday afternoon, the Pentagon finally confirmed the existence of the balloon.
Officials who spoke to Bloomberg News claimed by that time it “became visible in Montana,” President Joe Biden had already been briefed on the balloon and the White House was “scrambling to decide whether to blast it from the sky” — despite five days of monitoring it.
House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-AL) said in a statement on Saturday:
“Now, the White House must provide answers about why they decided to allow a CCP spy balloon to cross the United States and what damage to our national security occurred from this decision. The United States must project strength to deter China — this failure is another example of weakness by the Biden administration.”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/02/04/report-biden-administration-tried-to-hide-chinese-spy-balloon-from-american-public/
2- North Carolina citizens voted overwhelmingly for Voter ID a few years back when it was on the ballot. Governor Roy Cooper vetoed it, the NC Legislature over-rode his veto. Then a leftwing judge shot it down. This is a good example of how the left uses judges to nullify the will of the voters.
NC Supreme Court Hands Win to GOP on Redistricting, Voter ID
QUOTE: The North Carolina Supreme Court on Friday handed a victory to the state’s Republican legislators by siding with a petition that asked the high court to rehear cases involving election maps and voter identification laws.
In a vote along partisan lines, the state’s Supreme Court voted 5–2 to rehear the two cases in March—ones that North Carolina’s Republican legislature had previously lost.
Two Republicans running for seats on the North Carolina Supreme Court in the November midterm election beat their Democrat opponents, flipping the composition of the court red for the first time since 2016.
The partisan switch of the court revived Republican hopes to revisit the cases.
In one of the cases, Holmes v. Moore, the state Supreme Court ruled on Dec. 16, 2022, to strike down a law requiring photo voter identification. The justification for that decision was supposed discrimination against minorities.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Moore v. Harper on Dec. 7, 2022, but is not expected to rule on it for several months. This means that the North Carolina Supreme Court could potentially issue a ruling in the case that reverses the Republican loss before the U.S. Supreme Court has issued its decision.
Friday’s rulings by the North Carolina Supreme Court mean that both cases will be reheard on March 14, 2023.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/nc-supreme-court-hands-win-to-gop-on-redistricting-voter-id_5033977.html
1/3
3- You can see videos of this conference at the link and on Rumble. This is important information still being denied to citizens worldwide. Share it!
The media covered up this covid conference
QUOTE: A few weeks ago there was a massive conference in my home city of Stockholm. Top doctors from around the world came to give lectures and speak truth about covid and warn about the failures of the mRNA shots.
The conference was massive. About 1000 people in attendance to hear people like Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. Pierre Kory and more speak.
Naturally it was completely ignored by the mainstream media, almost like it didn’t happen at all. But it did happen and now you can watch the lectures for yourself!
We are still waiting on a few videos to be uploaded, but the first ones are now up.
I was there myself and can confirm the event was a huge success, now you get to watch the same lectures I saw in person.
First up was a brilliant lecture by Dr. Aseem Malhotra who just before this conference went viral after ”hijacking” a BBC interview to talk about how the mRNA shots were dangerous, being seen many tens of millions of times.
https://petersweden.substack.com/p/covid-conference
https://rumble.com/v2884ca-dr-aseem-malhotra-tackling-the-health-misinformation-mess-through-real-evid.html
https://rumble.com/v2888lm-dr-robert-malone-fifth-generation-warfare-and-sovereignty.html
https://rumble.com/v288bf0-meryl-nass-md-three-methods-of-control-medicine-censorshippropaganda-and-th.html
4- Two years ago Baylor fired Dr. Peter McCullough for promoting life saving early treatment of COVID. A few months later the leftist university tried to silence him by suing for a million dollars. This week, a judge dismissed their lawsuit with prejudice. This is an important victory. We will celebrate the victories of brave people who have stood up to the left cabal.
‘Wouldn’t Do Anything Different’: Dr. Peter McCullough Unbowed After Winning Legal Case
QUOTE: A district judge vindicated Texas cardiologist and outspoken COVID vaccine critic Dr. Peter McCullough on Wednesday, dismissing a lawsuit filed against him approximately two years ago by his former employer Baylor Scott and White Health system.
McCullough, dubbed a prominent purveyor of COVID misinformation by his detractors, was sued by the health system two years ago for allegedly violating a separation agreement and bringing the Baylor Scott and White Health name into the media. Associate Judge Tahira Khan Merritt of the Judicial District Court Dallas County dismissed the suit with prejudice.
“This is a strong victory for freedom of speech and fair balanced publication and media presentation of clinical data as it has emerged over the course of the pandemic crisis,” McCullough told The Daily Wire. “My analyses and conclusions have been accurate, consistent, and have always been my own, not those of any institution.”
Baylor accused McCullough in the $1 million lawsuit of “reputational harm,” stating that McCullough gave several media interviews and was published in journals that mentioned Baylor as an affiliate even though he had parted ways with the employer.
McCullough became a controversial figure in the medical field amid the global pandemic, which prompted medical associations and legacy media to discredit his promotion of hydroxychloroquine and other early treatments.
In December 2021, the cardiologist appeared on “The Joe Rogan Experience” podcast where he made a number of claims about information surrounding treatments for the coronavirus, including questioning the efficacy and safety of the vaccines and how the pandemic started.
“When I graduated from medical school, I took the Hippocratic Oath, which said that, above all, I would do no harm to any patient, and I would do everything in my power to help each and every patient,” McCullough said. “I’ve done that throughout the pandemic — not only with my personal patients — but through my public statements in my work as a public figure to help as many people in the world as possible, helping them avoid hospitalization and death with COVID-19 illness and helping them avoid injury, disability and death with COVID-19 vaccination.”
“I think this is a very important stance — I wouldn’t do anything any differently,” he said. “Whether there was a lawsuit or no lawsuit — this is very important.
The question on the table is, ‘Why can’t all doctors in America and in the world say that?’”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/wouldnt-do-anything-different-dr-peter-mccullough-unbowed-after-winning-legal-case
2/3
5- Until this is stopped, it doesn’t matter who runs for President.
‘Zuck Bucks 2.0’ Gears Up for 2024
QUOTE: The same nonprofit that distributed nearly $420 million in privately funded pandemic and operations grants to election offices nationwide before the 2020 elections is orchestrating a refashioned program for the 2024 election cycle.
The Chicago-based Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) said its U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence will funnel $80 million to local election offices in the form of two-year grants over the next five years as part of what it claims is a bipartisan effort “to create a network for the nation’s thousands of local election officials … to improve their technology and processes.”
In the wake of the 2020 elections, Republicans raised the alarm over revelations that CTCL had issued private money grants to nearly 2,500 county elections offices across 47 states and the District of Columbia for its Safe Elections Project, including $350 million donated by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.
Republicans maintain that CTCL aggressively recruited officials in counties and cities that are traditionally Democratic to participate in its programs and funneled “Zuckerbucks,” or “Zuck Bucks,” disproportionately into Democratic-voting jurisdictions.
CTCL grants and other private contributions to election offices, masked as COVID-19 relief, were geared toward “educating” elections offices about mail-in voting outreach and procedures, which drove the Democratic voter turnout that put President Joe Biden in the White House, conservatives claim.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/zuck-bucks-2-0-gears-up-for-2024_5009647.html?ea_src=ai&ea_med=search
https://defendingtherepublic.org/how-much-more-are-they-hiding/
3/3
Court Agrees to Expedite Lake’s Election Lawsuit as Rumors Swirl of Senate Run
February 6, 2023
A state appeals court in Arizona has agreed to expedite a hearing into a lawsuit brought by former GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake alleging enough election improprieties in November to have cost her a victory against then-Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who has since been inaugurated as governor.
The decision by the Arizona Court of Appeals comes after the state Supreme Court rejected her case earlier this month and remanded it to be heard first in lower courts. In a brief order, the court agreed with Lake’s arguments that her challenge should be handled as a “special action petition.” The court date is reportedly scheduled for March.
As her lawsuit is pending, Lake’s campaign responded to rumors that she is considering a run for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Krysten Sinema, who left her party months ago and is now a self-declared Independent.
“I’m told Kari Lake is considering running for the US Senate seat held by Kyrsten Sinema in 2024,” CNN political reporter Kate Sullivan posted on Twitter.
A recent poll showed that the firebrand Republican would defeat sitting Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema and Democrat challenger Ruben Gallego.
“The survey, released January 11 by the website Blueprint Polling, imagined a scenario in which Sinema, a former Democrat turned independent who’s held her Senate seat since 2019, runs for reelection against Lake and Gallego, a Democrat who represents the state’s 3rd Congressional District. Lake, who rumors say is considering running for the seat but has not confirmed this, polled at 36 percent, according to Blueprint, well ahead of the two rivals. Gallego trailed closely with 32 percent, while Sinema ran a distant third with 14 percent,” Deseret News reported.
The poll said that in a three-way contest, one of six voters surveyed was undecided, which could assist Sen. Sinema in keeping her position.
Since leaving the Democrat Party last month, Sen. Sinema has gained support from Republican and Democrat voters and, the poll said that her best chance to stay in the Senate “may be for the Republican party to nominate a candidate so flawed that moderate and conservative voters would abandon that person for the Independent Sinema.”
Sinema officially left the Democratic Party in December and changed her affiliation to the Independent. Her move weakens Democrats’ already tenuous hold on the upper chamber. Prior to her announcement, Democrats had a 51-50 majority in the U.S. Senate.
https://conservativebrief.com/court-kari-70619/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=DJD