Anonymous ID: 78463d Feb. 13, 2023, 5:55 a.m. No.18338779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8797

>>18338762

one line of thought is

that demons inhabit the minds of those

who allow it.

and so we get good people aping the words they hear in media that are creepy rapey and groomery, as if it's 'humor'.

and then they call it 'free speech'

some say that the urge to do that kind of echooooing of the creepy voices is

. . . drum roll . . .

what you were asking about.

of course clinical Psychologetics says other stuff, but could be called an 'alternative mythology' if only the topic were not so serious.

fortunately most peole when confronted with it by a forward person will introspect and cast our that tiny demon that festered there in their thoughts pretending to be humourous adult insight,

 

so that's a tiny explanation of a very large topic: demons are in the mind, not on the sidewalk as an entity. they need to be hosted

in someone's thoughts.

Anonymous ID: 78463d Feb. 13, 2023, 6:02 a.m. No.18338810   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8831

>>18338797

It might be hard to follow but as I said

most peole are self correcting and

when confronted (nicely) will

cast the demon (we can call it a metaphor now) out on their own.

just don't expect a public display of this.

Anonymous ID: 78463d Feb. 13, 2023, 8:18 a.m. No.18339395   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18338831

>>18338831

>>18338831

 

gatekeeper shill,

how can a metaphysical topic ever have sauce?

I don't pretend that it does.

didn't you see 'one explanation' in my first post or the word 'metaphor' in the next?

 

but all you do is the algebra of putdowns and casting aside anyone who tries to shed light on the pathos that you demand from all posters.