>>18353140 LB

Bringing this forward from last thread. Not original poster but interested in hearing more thoughts on what the end game of a military FF of this nature might be beyond just testing the waters to see if Dewine/Shapiro would be willing to nuke the area creating a humanitarian and ecological holocaust in the process. What actionable steps could then be taken beyond lawsuits that would have an effect on the outcome of the movie we’re watching? Moar panic for the derp state, suppose. But there would have to be something more than that for an op of this scale, right?

>>18353381

Check breads since last night for an answer to your question. An anon put up some nice graphics with the Gates’ owned acreage in the relevant areas and watersheds effected by the disaster.

>>18353438

Anon lubs a thick chick! Baker bewbs? Kek! TYB!

>>18353440

Not for the constitutionally weak. That’s for damn sure! Shit takes a toll, no doubt!

>>18353479

That’s what I’m talkin’ bout! Glorious!

>>18353503

Kek! I said thick, anon, not jaba the hut fat! Well do on spoilering that shit for benefit of others, though. Wew!

>>18353564

This sounds like a great idea, especially if you are using biologically complete soils loaded with bacteria/fungi which are specifically chosen for their ability to attack and transmute the toxic substances. Sadly, that would require leaders in positions of power who actually wanted to help us, not harm us.

>>18353643

Thanks for fleshing that out. Food for thought, for sure.

>>18353670

They certainly are most wonderfully made!

>>18353708

What makes you think so?

>>18353726

Natural beauty is hawt and def comes from healthy living. Don’t go losing ALL them lovely curves, though!