>>18356806 (lb)
Who funded WL, anon? It looks like CDAN was right about JA, which means he had direct ties to Soros. Gosh darn, what a let down.
>>18356806 (lb)
Who funded WL, anon? It looks like CDAN was right about JA, which means he had direct ties to Soros. Gosh darn, what a let down.
"Well? All I can tell ya iz… huwhat's happenin' with these ballooooons is, uh, stranger than uh one legged duck in a wet t-shirt foldin' contest. Y'all miiight wanna double bolt yer double wide, else yer gonna have double dragon trouble sleepin' at niiight."
That's fine until some assbutt comes along with a Cracker Jack Schwarz ring and flips the switch from suck to blow.
You think Soros is the type to go all in? He didn't even make the top three in the list.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/07/blind-items-revealed-38.html?m=1
Who (had) Intel on every government in the world and only used that Intel against the US and why? Why would "Q" flaunt that they have Assange and didn't care if "they" had the servers? It's all more nuanced than white hat black hat.