baker
re last bread's notes
You bake well but doesn't mean you can put anything in notables that you want, like muh masons and muh joos. This is Q board, not Joo board.
Those posts don't relate to anything current or new, looks like anon called out the muh joos last bread.
Why did you leave it in?
>>18365924, >>18365932, >>18365945, >>18365949 Masons
>>18365982, >>18365990, >>18366018, >>18366047, >>18366081 Jacob Javits / Edward Mandell
It's late, reply nb if you wish.
Shills post muh joos to get this board in trouble with ADL and other groups and agencies, to make ordinary people believe anons are bigots. Much of it could be posted by ADL etc - the perfect wrapup smear.
We tolerate a LOT for the sake of free speech. TOLERATE is the right word - does not mean it is endorsed officially or unofficially by either the site, the board or especially Q.
>Do you do this with any other topic that is brought up?
Yes, we do this with any topic that presents material that is irrelevant, unsauced or rejected by anons as being not appropriate for notables.
Anons post a lot of stuff that is ok for the board but not notable. We don't delete discussions on jews, masons, the Vatican or a whole range of other topics - for example, historical accounts.
But neither do we NOTABLE them unless they are new information that is relevant to the work we do.
Will repost this nb, as well.