Discussion re notables, con't.

>>18366374 pb

baker

re last bread's notes

You bake well but doesn't mean you can put anything in notables that you want, like muh masons and muh joos. This is Q board, not Joo board.

Those posts don't relate to anything current or new, looks like anon called out the muh joos last bread.

Why did you leave it in?

>>18365924, >>18365932, >>18365945, >>18365949 Masons

>>18365982, >>18365990, >>18366018, >>18366047, >>18366081 Jacob Javits / Edward Mandell

>>18367070

Here we go. Do you do this with any other topic that is brought up? Patterns are emerging.

>>18367092

>Do you do this with any other topic that is brought up?

Yes, we do this with any topic that presents material that is irrelevant, unsauced or rejected by anons as being not appropriate for notables.

Anons post a lot of stuff that is ok for the board but not notable. We don't delete discussions on jews, masons, the Vatican or a whole range of other topics - for example, historical accounts.

But neither do we NOTABLE them unless they are new information that is relevant to the work we do.

Will repost this nb, as well.

>>18367237

ALL links are PB.

>>18367164 pb

>re nuking jews, masons, other stuff

Normally don't pay a lot of attention to discussions of those or anything else, it's a free speech board. Do remove graphics that are especially insulting and have no real informational value, especially when spammed. Then all bets are off.

>>18367245

replace in the dough?

>>18367122

baker

BV replaced it, wants baker to replace in dough.

What do you say?

>>18367324

>pff

You think bad guise don't PLANT stuff here to try to take down Jim Watkins and this site? Read the transcript of JW testimony to J6 committee.

Anons have differing opinions on many things but Q work is based on tolerance. Q clearly advocates unity not division based on race, religion, etc.

>>18367293

>1) Are you Jewish or Religious?

>2) Are you a Mason?

>3) Are you srs righ naaa?

I need not defend myself, i am ANON like everyone else. You may judge me as you will, by my actions on this board over time.

Why did you put joos and masons stuff in notabes?

>>18367417

this was posted in notables, baker.

>>18367431

"Wait" is the salient word.

Q says only that "we are saving Israel for last".

And that is not really about the Jews per se but about the country.

>>18367449

>This for example should not be in notables?

Jul 19, 2021 Billionaires George Soros….

you did not provide a link so cannot look.

>>18367122

>>18367512

when i say joos it means MUH JOOS - the kind of material that does not belong in notables.

You are too intelligent not to know exactly what it means and why it does not belong there. The mason stuff didn't even have one shred of substance - look like a complete shill job, like you as the baker were not acting in good faith.

So i'll ask the baker on duty to replace the notables.

End of discussion.

• OUT.

>>18367494

baker

please replace the #22513 notables in the dough with the #22513 notables posted here:

>>18367166

TY for asking.

Might want to include the discussion about what belongs in notables and why in the notes, up to you as baker.

>>18367561

Does not require a legal adjudication to take down this board, already happened once. 8kun only exists due to the courage and commitment of the Watkins family and the stubbornness of anons.

>>18367591

>>18367659

looks like BV already provided the link here:

>>18367177

updated dough

https://fullchan.net/?447b0fe33c73d0b1#EJF8y3Usb726wxzQHxHFLiaKYaP7BTQDmrpWe2wgy979

>>18367672

You were talking about court system and evidence. It requires no evidence to take down free speech platforms or accounts, just enough brute force to make it stick.

>>18367709

ty baker.