Anonymous ID: 459a11 Feb. 20, 2023, 3:37 p.m. No.18384325   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4340

Quit whinin' you need Q and start pushing secession to all your social media norms.

Either /ours/ devolute like they promised or anon is all for breaking up this sick union.

Anonymous ID: 459a11 Feb. 20, 2023, 4 p.m. No.18384444   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4449 >>4456 >>4492 >>4511 >>4612 >>4649 >>4693 >>4743

 

Gonzalez v. Google LLC

 

Issues

Can online platforms be held liable for algorithmically recommending harmful third-party content to users?

 

Oral argument:

February 21, 2023

Court below:

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

This case asks the Supreme Court to decide whether online platforms can be held liable for algorithmically recommending third-party content to users. Petitioner Reynaldo Gonzalez argues that Google LLC can be held liable for YouTube’s recommendations of ISIS recruitment videos because YouTube does not qualify for immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Respondent Google LLC argues that since YouTube did not create the ISIS videos at issue, it should be able to claim immunity under Section 230. This case will affect the availability of remedies for victims of harmful online content, internet company accountability, moderation, and online speech.

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/21-1333

Anonymous ID: 459a11 Feb. 20, 2023, 4:16 p.m. No.18384522   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18384469

 

It needs to be fitted with some type of technology that electrocutes them dead if they try to cut it off, else they'll do like this guy and do just that. Cut it off and was on the lam for 11 months.