>>18399544 /pb

>NO PLANES: SPECIAL EFFECTS EXPERT COMPLETELY DESTROYS OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY! VIDEO COMPOSITES REVEALED

The slow motion retards are at it again. Run any fucking thing that is uncommon and at extremes of human force, velocity, etc. and the slow motion version is mind boggling. These shills are taking our everyday experience of temporal phenomena and fucking with you using what things look and sound like in contexts that are not life-speed. Of course, it's going to be wild. Add some narrative to mindfuck you and without any discernment, you've gone full retard. Now go watch slow motion video of people shooting bullets into different objects. It's not the same because of the scale…but similar. Now feel stupid, pick up the pieces of yourself, and carry on.

Going forward, focus on building 7. It's a better narrative to leverage for the demolition theory.

>>18402022

damn. you must be needing to defend a narrative.

>>18402047

official narrative is BS for sure.

the "no plane" evidence that is out there is weak. it has always been weak. the over-analysis paralysis is what seems to be convincing people, not any actual evidence, just the fucking bombardment of people questioning the evidence using slow motion and conjecture.

so back to my main point. you seem to give more of a fuck about misdirecting people rather than convincing people. If you actually wanted to help people wake up and gain more allies, you'd leave this alone and focus on talking about building 7. Otherwise, planes or no planes, you're exposing yourself as a shill.