Anonymous ID: 08274c March 7, 2023, 5:37 a.m. No.18460971   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0982 >>1003 >>1015

>>18460954

Let's see..

-They entered altered video into evidence.

-They used that evidence [Knowingly] against not only the former President but against the people who harmlessly walked around.

-They violated all kinds of rights doing so.

 

Anything else?

Anonymous ID: 08274c March 7, 2023, 5:43 a.m. No.18461005   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1027 >>1168 >>1175

The MSM can spin & smear all they want, but there is no defense of the J6 Committee cutting clips to remove context or lying about things that the footage contradicted. Tucker exposed the J6 Committee, which the media treated as the word of God, as a dishonest partisan charade.

 

https://twitter.com/Surabees/status/1633097830381375489

Anonymous ID: 08274c March 7, 2023, 5:56 a.m. No.18461072   🗄️.is 🔗kun

For those that did not see

@TuckerCarlson

last night.

 

The MSM works for the current govt or worse (ie., those deeply entrenched security state apparatchiks & globalist leaders). And all former members of the fake J6 subcommittee should be censured (at a minimum)!

 

Our justice system is broken…

 

https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1633103819230912512

Anonymous ID: 08274c March 7, 2023, 5:59 a.m. No.18461085   🗄️.is 🔗kun

In addition to many untrue statements from this “reporter,” Chansley did not go to trial. And the notion all this footage is “public” when the government essentially placed a universal protective order on all surveillance video is a flat out lie

 

https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1633096072221319168

Anonymous ID: 08274c March 7, 2023, 6:08 a.m. No.18461141   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1150

Re Tucker and videos.

One very important clarification.

Yes, DOJ made a database of videos available to defense attorneys in filed cases.

BUT …

DOJ could only put into the database what Congress gave DOJ.

If Congress/Pelosi held back video then DOJ would not have it to put in the database.

All videos from body worn cameras of USCP and CCTV are the property of Congress, not DOJ.

That is a separation of powers issue.

Whether DOJ was obligated by Brady to get videos from Congress was litigated, and Judges held that DOJ didn't have any way to force Congress to produce videos it didn't want to produce, even if they were Brady material.

Regardless of what media members say, it is not possible to say definitively right now that defense attorneys did in fact have all the videos that Tucker/Fox is showing. McCarthy says he gave Fox everything. That might include videos not given to DOJ by Pelosi/Cong. Dems.

 

https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1632946286310686721