Anon wondering something.

"no deals" but then "corruption so deep deals need to be cut".

Ok. ignoring contradictions or fact maybe no deals with specifically for Hillary as Im not 100% on that it gets to me with this.

So you're saying some of these snakes get to keep all their money, lavish lifestyles, fame, because "muh optics, the public"? How is that justice? Anon understands some were blackmailed and forced into doing things. Fine. Let them be. But lets rundown this list.

Soros - free

Rothschilds - all free

Zelensky - free and making billions as this is typed out

Pelosi - free

Schumer - free

How many pieces of shit from Hollywood - free

Obama, Clinton, Bush - Free, free, free

"Athletes" - free

Anon understands things take time. Anon reads theories of clones and all these concepts. Anons asks, can't they just concoct a story to beak these people? "Brad Pitt loses everything in poor investments" "Obama has millions lost in stock that crashes". Seems easiest way to make a movie and enjoy a show.

If enough proofs come out people will have to understand Q was legitimate and if Q is legit to all, the subjects are validated. Thus meaning this 40/60 can go out the window. Talking in circles because it's become one.