NOT SO FAST, NEO:
https://medium.com/crownsontop/sophiastewartthemotherofthematrix-c4ead5c9797b
She spits a good Frank Dux, but that's all she is.
>How does an atheist take part in a spiritual battle?
By understanding the use of rhetoric to rile a base around the common cause.
>I have no good reason to believe in a God.
And that's fine. Do you believe in patterns? What do the patterns show you about what is discussed here? Does that align your goals for the future of humanity with some that may take a mostly spiritual approach in accomplishing the same goals (a better world/future)?
You anons are not alone. You anons, actually, might find yourselves in an increasingly exclusive portion of a movement where the common objective is the same as those you may (in other ares) ideologically disagree. I expect that segment to grow tremendously, actually, as time goes on. Future generations will see secular humanism as less of a reactionary element of society and more of a rational conclusion.
Besides, the idea of secularists siding with believers for life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness is way older than you may think.
>What do you base morality on if not from a higher source?
Common sense and common decency.
>So when Q posts prayers
Sometimes it's comms. Sometimes its motivation for the larger portion of the base (rhetoric). Sometimes it's a wink to those seeing it from a different angle.
Perspective is key.
>Focus on what matters to you, and by your works you shall be known.
THIS
This is a blessed message.
>Dividing by the Religion that they were forced to believe is by design and they cannot help it.
Presenting Truth as Truth without puzzles, riddles, mazes, and limricks isn't persuasive enough for some. It's nice to engage in straightfoward dialogue with those that have questions!
This is what excites me. Seeing these:
In my opinion, this is progress. Pic very related:
>But this is your opinion with no sauce.
I don't have to prove anything to you to provide perspective. You either take it and run with it, or you don't. Provide evidence to his existence. You can't. So you can't be given dominion over anyone out of the interest of fairness and liberty, but you are absolutely free to believe whatever it is you want to believe. Not all non believers want to remove your right to do so.
>neither of us can prove why
Yet when possible explanations are given, your response is to dismiss them. That's an excellent demonstration of how belief works, and why so many have walked away from the church, and continue to do so. If you refuse to consider the perspective that there may be use of allegory in some of the drops to poke fun of the spell that's been cast on believers for centuries, that's on you.
The man's a fucking genius, though, so we agree on that.
>70% consider themselves "religious" so POTUS and the PLAN must represent and it would be a strategic error to alienate them so… here we are.
It'd be a phenominal error to exclude them. And dropping hints to secularists along the way is sheer genius.
>This contradicts the term "Great Awakening".
It's redefining it. What was the answer to Enlightnement? The church wanted to take over the new nation. many founding fathers fought diligently against that for obvious reasons. To be truly awakened is to know the truth. You've been lied to, and convinced of a fairy tale to make you into a asset in an ideological struggle that's been going on for far longer than many want to acknowledge and realize. Because to do so would draw accusations of the label 'conspiracy'.
They aren't fighting against your "religion". They own both sides of the board. You either worship them by becoming a part of their backend system, or you worship them by believing the ever-living God sacrificed his own son in a bloodletting ritual that you commemorate by eating his flesh and blood in transubstantiation.
Can anons reconcile with those they've been ideologically opposed to for so long? The future of this great Republic depends on it.
No pressure.
It was a coordinated effort, yes.
>before true price discovery is allowed in gold and silver
Think about it this way. The price of Gold, silver, and yes, Oil have been artificially suppressed to keep fiat above them by leaps and bounds. If the true value of money were to have been adjusted already, and the markets all agreed to a price swap to turn in Legal Tender reserve notes for real Currency backed by precious metals and natural resources, the cartels would have multiple times more power and control than they are currently losing. Joe's depleting of the reserve might actually be part of the script (agreement) to give some nations some sort of national reserves to back their currencies as things move forward.
If the plan is to suck up the money supply through making the system implode on itself in a continuing cycle of consolidation, and the end of that plan is to seize the assets in their entire before the announced "swap", then the resulting "BOOM" will be a economic reset resulting in potential prosperity for everyone. That's why it's taking so long. Wouldn't want to empower those criminals again with new currency, right?